利用现有软件的多样性,实现物种分布建模的更高标准

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07346
Jamie M. Kass, Adam B. Smith, Dan L. Warren, Sergio Vignali, Sylvain Schmitt, Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens, Eduardo Arlé, Ana Márcia Barbosa, Olivier Broennimann, Marlon E. Cobos, Maya Guéguen, Antoine Guisan, Cory Merow, Babak Naimi, Michael P. Nobis, Ian Ondo, Luis Osorio-Olvera, Hannah L. Owens, Gonzalo E. Pinilla-Buitrago, Andrea Sánchez-Tapia, Wilfried Thuiller, Roozbeh Valavi, Santiago José Elías Velazco, Alexander Zizka, Damaris Zurell
{"title":"利用现有软件的多样性,实现物种分布建模的更高标准","authors":"Jamie M. Kass, Adam B. Smith, Dan L. Warren, Sergio Vignali, Sylvain Schmitt, Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens, Eduardo Arlé, Ana Márcia Barbosa, Olivier Broennimann, Marlon E. Cobos, Maya Guéguen, Antoine Guisan, Cory Merow, Babak Naimi, Michael P. Nobis, Ian Ondo, Luis Osorio-Olvera, Hannah L. Owens, Gonzalo E. Pinilla-Buitrago, Andrea Sánchez-Tapia, Wilfried Thuiller, Roozbeh Valavi, Santiago José Elías Velazco, Alexander Zizka, Damaris Zurell","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing online availability of biodiversity data and advances in ecological modeling have led to a proliferation of open-source modeling tools. In particular, R packages for species distribution modeling continue to multiply without guidance on how they can be employed together, resulting in high fidelity of researchers to one or several packages. Here, we assess the wide variety of software for species distribution models (SDMs) and highlight how packages can work together to diversify and expand analyses in each step of a modeling workflow. We also introduce the new R package ‘sdmverse' to catalog metadata for packages, cluster them based on their methodological functions, and visualize their relationships. To demonstrate how pluralism of software use helps improve SDM workflows, we provide three extensive and fully documented analyses that utilize tools for modeling and visualization from multiple packages, then score these tutorials according to recent methodological standards. We end by identifying gaps in the capabilities of current tools and highlighting outstanding challenges in the development of software for SDMs.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving higher standards in species distribution modeling by leveraging the diversity of available software\",\"authors\":\"Jamie M. Kass, Adam B. Smith, Dan L. Warren, Sergio Vignali, Sylvain Schmitt, Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens, Eduardo Arlé, Ana Márcia Barbosa, Olivier Broennimann, Marlon E. Cobos, Maya Guéguen, Antoine Guisan, Cory Merow, Babak Naimi, Michael P. Nobis, Ian Ondo, Luis Osorio-Olvera, Hannah L. Owens, Gonzalo E. Pinilla-Buitrago, Andrea Sánchez-Tapia, Wilfried Thuiller, Roozbeh Valavi, Santiago José Elías Velazco, Alexander Zizka, Damaris Zurell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing online availability of biodiversity data and advances in ecological modeling have led to a proliferation of open-source modeling tools. In particular, R packages for species distribution modeling continue to multiply without guidance on how they can be employed together, resulting in high fidelity of researchers to one or several packages. Here, we assess the wide variety of software for species distribution models (SDMs) and highlight how packages can work together to diversify and expand analyses in each step of a modeling workflow. We also introduce the new R package ‘sdmverse' to catalog metadata for packages, cluster them based on their methodological functions, and visualize their relationships. To demonstrate how pluralism of software use helps improve SDM workflows, we provide three extensive and fully documented analyses that utilize tools for modeling and visualization from multiple packages, then score these tutorials according to recent methodological standards. We end by identifying gaps in the capabilities of current tools and highlighting outstanding challenges in the development of software for SDMs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07346\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07346","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物多样性数据的在线可用性不断提高,生态建模技术不断进步,导致开源建模工具激增。特别是,用于物种分布建模的 R 软件包不断增多,但却没有指导如何将它们结合起来使用,导致研究人员高度忠实于一个或几个软件包。在此,我们将对种类繁多的物种分布模型(SDM)软件进行评估,并重点介绍这些软件包如何在建模工作流程的每个步骤中协同工作,以实现分析的多样化和扩展性。我们还介绍了新的 R 软件包 "sdmverse",它可以对软件包的元数据进行编目,根据方法功能对软件包进行聚类,并可视化它们之间的关系。为了展示软件使用的多元化如何有助于改进 SDM 工作流程,我们提供了三份内容广泛、记录完整的分析报告,其中使用了多个软件包的建模和可视化工具,然后根据最新的方法标准对这些教程进行评分。最后,我们指出了当前工具在功能上的差距,并强调了在开发 SDM 软件方面面临的突出挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Achieving higher standards in species distribution modeling by leveraging the diversity of available software
The increasing online availability of biodiversity data and advances in ecological modeling have led to a proliferation of open-source modeling tools. In particular, R packages for species distribution modeling continue to multiply without guidance on how they can be employed together, resulting in high fidelity of researchers to one or several packages. Here, we assess the wide variety of software for species distribution models (SDMs) and highlight how packages can work together to diversify and expand analyses in each step of a modeling workflow. We also introduce the new R package ‘sdmverse' to catalog metadata for packages, cluster them based on their methodological functions, and visualize their relationships. To demonstrate how pluralism of software use helps improve SDM workflows, we provide three extensive and fully documented analyses that utilize tools for modeling and visualization from multiple packages, then score these tutorials according to recent methodological standards. We end by identifying gaps in the capabilities of current tools and highlighting outstanding challenges in the development of software for SDMs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
期刊最新文献
Colonization and extinction lags drive non-linear responses to warming in mountain plant communities across the Northern Hemisphere Differential predation patterns of free-ranging cats among continents Competitive interactions modify the direct effects of climate Achieving higher standards in species distribution modeling by leveraging the diversity of available software Seasonal macro-demography of North American bird populations revealed through participatory science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1