生态恢复对丛枝菌根真菌提供的互惠服务的影响取决于地点和宿主身份

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Plant and Soil Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s11104-024-07083-x
Kevin A. MacColl, Hafiz Maherali
{"title":"生态恢复对丛枝菌根真菌提供的互惠服务的影响取决于地点和宿主身份","authors":"Kevin A. MacColl, Hafiz Maherali","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07083-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims and scope</h3><p>Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form soil hyphal networks that facilitate plant nutrient uptake. AM fungi can be less effective plant-mutualists in cultivated fields because agricultural stressors reduce their functional diversity and may favour a less mutualistic genotype. Previously, we showed restoration of retired cultivated fields stimulated AM fungal species diversity. Here, we tested if restoration also stimulated mutualistic functions of AM fungi.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Soil inoculum was collected from five farm sites in cultivated fields and adjacent prairies that had been restored 8–12 years previously. Plant-growth promoting functions of AM fungi were quantified under greenhouse conditions by comparing biomass and phosphorus content in <i>Trifolium pratense</i> and <i>Andropogon gerardii</i> plants whose access to AM fungal networks was severed or left intact.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Plant biomass was higher in the intact vs. severed AM fungal network treatment but the mean effect did not differ between restored prairie and cultivated field inoculum. Nonetheless, soil inoculum source effect on biomass depended on site location for <i>T. pratense</i>, but not <i>A. gerardii</i>. Access to AM fungal networks from cultivated fields increased phosphorus in <i>T. pratense</i>, but reduced phosphorus in <i>A. gerardii</i>, compared to restored prairies. Soil inoculum source effects on phosphorus also depended on farm site location.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Ecological restoration did not universally increase mutualistic functions of AM fungi. However, the fact that plant responses to AM fungi were dependent on site location and host identity suggests that ecological restoration has complex effects on the mutualistic benefits that plants receive from AM fungi.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of ecological restoration on mutualistic services provided by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi depends on site location and host identity\",\"authors\":\"Kevin A. MacColl, Hafiz Maherali\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07083-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aims and scope</h3><p>Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form soil hyphal networks that facilitate plant nutrient uptake. AM fungi can be less effective plant-mutualists in cultivated fields because agricultural stressors reduce their functional diversity and may favour a less mutualistic genotype. Previously, we showed restoration of retired cultivated fields stimulated AM fungal species diversity. Here, we tested if restoration also stimulated mutualistic functions of AM fungi.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Soil inoculum was collected from five farm sites in cultivated fields and adjacent prairies that had been restored 8–12 years previously. Plant-growth promoting functions of AM fungi were quantified under greenhouse conditions by comparing biomass and phosphorus content in <i>Trifolium pratense</i> and <i>Andropogon gerardii</i> plants whose access to AM fungal networks was severed or left intact.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Plant biomass was higher in the intact vs. severed AM fungal network treatment but the mean effect did not differ between restored prairie and cultivated field inoculum. Nonetheless, soil inoculum source effect on biomass depended on site location for <i>T. pratense</i>, but not <i>A. gerardii</i>. Access to AM fungal networks from cultivated fields increased phosphorus in <i>T. pratense</i>, but reduced phosphorus in <i>A. gerardii</i>, compared to restored prairies. Soil inoculum source effects on phosphorus also depended on farm site location.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Ecological restoration did not universally increase mutualistic functions of AM fungi. However, the fact that plant responses to AM fungi were dependent on site location and host identity suggests that ecological restoration has complex effects on the mutualistic benefits that plants receive from AM fungi.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07083-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07083-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和范围草本菌根(AM)真菌形成土壤菌丝网络,促进植物对养分的吸收。在耕地中,AM 真菌的植物互利性可能会降低,因为农业胁迫因素会降低其功能多样性,并可能有利于互利性较低的基因型。此前,我们曾发现,恢复退耕的耕地会刺激 AM 真菌物种的多样性。方法从 5 个农场的耕地和邻近草原上收集土壤接种物,这些耕地和草原已在 8-12 年前进行了修复。在温室条件下,通过比较Trifolium pratense和Andropogon gerardii植物的生物量和磷含量,量化了AM真菌促进植物生长的功能,这些植物与AM真菌网络的联系被切断或保持完整。然而,土壤接种源对 T. pratense 的生物量的影响取决于种植地点,但对 A. gerardii 却没有影响。与恢复后的大草原相比,从耕地中获得的调幅真菌网络增加了 T. pratense 的磷含量,但减少了 A. gerardii 的磷含量。土壤接种源对磷的影响也取决于农场所在地。然而,植物对AM真菌的反应取决于地点和寄主身份,这表明生态恢复对植物从AM真菌中获得的互惠效益具有复杂的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of ecological restoration on mutualistic services provided by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi depends on site location and host identity

Aims and scope

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form soil hyphal networks that facilitate plant nutrient uptake. AM fungi can be less effective plant-mutualists in cultivated fields because agricultural stressors reduce their functional diversity and may favour a less mutualistic genotype. Previously, we showed restoration of retired cultivated fields stimulated AM fungal species diversity. Here, we tested if restoration also stimulated mutualistic functions of AM fungi.

Methods

Soil inoculum was collected from five farm sites in cultivated fields and adjacent prairies that had been restored 8–12 years previously. Plant-growth promoting functions of AM fungi were quantified under greenhouse conditions by comparing biomass and phosphorus content in Trifolium pratense and Andropogon gerardii plants whose access to AM fungal networks was severed or left intact.

Results

Plant biomass was higher in the intact vs. severed AM fungal network treatment but the mean effect did not differ between restored prairie and cultivated field inoculum. Nonetheless, soil inoculum source effect on biomass depended on site location for T. pratense, but not A. gerardii. Access to AM fungal networks from cultivated fields increased phosphorus in T. pratense, but reduced phosphorus in A. gerardii, compared to restored prairies. Soil inoculum source effects on phosphorus also depended on farm site location.

Conclusions

Ecological restoration did not universally increase mutualistic functions of AM fungi. However, the fact that plant responses to AM fungi were dependent on site location and host identity suggests that ecological restoration has complex effects on the mutualistic benefits that plants receive from AM fungi.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
期刊最新文献
Responses of forest soil respiration in the East Asian monsoon region to ENSO events Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on Se accumulation and associated rhizobacterial community in Cardamine hupingshanensis The effect of ecological restoration on mutualistic services provided by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi depends on site location and host identity Combination of plant and soil water potential monitoring and modelling demonstrates soil-root hydraulic disconnection during drought Metabolomics and dual proteomics identify contrasting patterns of major pathways affected in asparagus shoot upon Fusarium infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1