Pitfall of lung ultrasound in the quantification of pneumothorax

We read with interest the article by Michael Beshara et al. [1] entitled “Nuts and bolts of lung ultrasound: utility, scanning techniques, protocols, and findings in common pathologies”. In this review, the author provides a complete and accurate description of the latest applications of pulmonary ultrasound. For the part of pneumothorax, only the diagnostic methods and ultrasound signs were described. However, the application of pneumothorax in pulmonary imaging tools should include qualitative diagnosis, quantification, and localization.

Numerous studies have demonstrated the value of lung ultrasound in diagnosing pneumothorax. Lung ultrasound can preliminarily diagnose pneumothorax by identifying four key signs: absence of pleural sliding, lung pulse, B-lines, and lung consolidation [2, 3]. Additionally, scanning for the “lung point” and/or “stratosphere sign” aids in diagnosing and localizing pneumothorax [4]. However, for intensivists, quantitative assessment is crucial for making informed decisions regarding treatment strategies for pneumothorax. This assessment helps determine whether to adopt conservative management, such as watchful waiting, or to proceed with interventional options like chest tube placement. In this context, the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound is superior to that of supine chest X-ray (CXR); however, this evaluation may have significant limitations [5].

It is suggested that when lung ultrasound shows a complete "stratosphere sign" (absence of the lung point sign) on one side, it indicates that the lung lobe has been fully compressed by intrapleural gas, resulting in a complete loss of pleural apposition, potentially indicating a large pneumothorax. However, the actual volume of pneumothorax in patients with a complete stratosphere sign can vary widely. In three patients with a complete stratosphere sign on one side, chest CT scans revealed varying degrees of lung compression by pneumothorax, resulting in significant differences in pneumothorax volume and subsequent treatment choices (Fig. 1A–C). Thus, the complete stratosphere sign only indicates a large surface area of pneumothorax but cannot quantify its volume.

Fig. 1

Three patients with pneumothorax all showed the stratosphere sign on lung ultrasound, but the pneumothorax volume could not be quantified: a Lung compression was approximately 20%. b Lung compression was approximately 50%. c Lung compression was more than 90%

Full size image

The lung point sign marks the boundary between the normal lung, where the pleural layers are apposed, and pneumothorax, where the layers have separated. It has been suggested that when the lung point sign is closer to the upper lung, it may indicate a smaller pneumothorax [6]. However, this assumption is not entirely accurate. The lung point sign reflects only the surface area of pneumothorax and may not correlate with its actual volume. For example, in two patients with the lung point sign at the same anatomical location, chest CT scans showed significant differences in intrapleural gas depth, leading to considerable variation in pneumothorax volume and different treatment choices (Fig. 2A, B). Therefore, the lung point sign indicates only the surface extent of pneumothorax and cannot be used for quantitative volume assessment.

Fig. 2

Two patients with pneumothorax both exhibited the lung point sign on lung ultrasound, with the lung point located in almost the same position (at the junction of the left lateral chest wall, posterior axillary line, and the 7th rib). a Lung compression was approximately 70%. b Lung compression was approximately 10%

Full size image

In summary, because lung ultrasound cannot assess the depth of pneumothorax, both the complete stratosphere sign (absence of the lung point sign) and the lung point sign can only qualitatively diagnose pneumothorax and indicate its surface location on the affected side. However, they cannot directly evaluate pneumothorax volume. It is crucial to recognize the limitations of lung ultrasound in quantitatively assessing pneumothorax, considering that CT would be the gold standard.

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

1. Beshara M, Bittner EA, Goffi A, Berra L, Chang MG. Nuts and bolts of lung ultrasound: utility, scanning techniques, protocols, and findings in common pathologies. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):328.

   Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

2. Volpicelli G. Sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(2):224–32.

   Article PubMed Google Scholar

3. Lichtenstein DA. BLUE-protocol and FALLS-protocol: two applications of lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Chest. 2015;147(6):1659–70.

   Article PubMed Google Scholar

4. Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, Melniker L, Gargani L, Noble VE, Via G, Dean A, Tsung JW, Soldati G, Copetti R, Bouhemad B, Reissig A, Agricola E, Rouby JJ, Arbelot C, Liteplo A, Sargsyan A, Silva F, Hoppmann R, Breitkreutz R, Seibel A, Neri L, Storti E, Petrovic T. International Liaison Committee on lung ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for international consensus conference on lung ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(4):577–91.

   Article PubMed Google Scholar

5. Chan KK, Joo DA, McRae AD, Takwoingi Y, Premji ZA, Lang E, Wakai A. Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7):CD013031.

   PubMed Google Scholar

6. Husain LF, Hagopian L, Wayman D, Baker WE, Carmody KA. Sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012;5(1):76–81.

   Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

None.

Not applicable.

Author notes

1. Haotian Zhao and Kai Liu have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Ultrasound, Hebei General Hospital, No.348 Heping West Road, Xinhua Area, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China

   Haotian Zhao & Li Li

2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

   Kai Liu

3. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, No.348 Heping West Road, Xinhua Area, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China

   Heling Zhao

Authors

1. Haotian ZhaoView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

2. Kai LiuView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

3. Li LiView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

4. Heling ZhaoView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Resources: Haotian Zhao Supervision: Heling Zhao, Li Li. Visualization: Haotian Zhao, Kai Liu. Writing—original draft: Haotian Zhao, Kai Liu. Writing—review & editing: Heling Zhao, Li Li. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li Li or Heling Zhao.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed written consent was obtained from the patient’s next of kin before the examination.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Liu, K., Li, L. et al. Pitfall of lung ultrasound in the quantification of pneumothorax. Crit Care 28, 371 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05169-7

Download citation

• Received: 18 October 2024

• Accepted: 11 November 2024

• Published: 19 November 2024

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05169-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative