更新皮肤过敏的反应机制域:1.亲核皮肤致敏物质

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Chemical Research in Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c0020710.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00207
David W. Roberts*, Anne Marie Api, Aynur Aptula, Isabelle Lee and Holger Moustakas, 
{"title":"更新皮肤过敏的反应机制域:1.亲核皮肤致敏物质","authors":"David W. Roberts*,&nbsp;Anne Marie Api,&nbsp;Aynur Aptula,&nbsp;Isabelle Lee and Holger Moustakas,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c0020710.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >It has long been recognized that skin sensitizers either are electrophilic or can be activated to electrophilic species. Several nonanimal assays for skin sensitization are based on this premise. In the course of a project to update dermal sensitization thresholds (DST), we found a substantial number of sensitizers, with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, that could be simply explained in terms of the sensitizer acting as a nucleophile. In some cases, the nucleophilic center is a sulfur or phosphorus atom, while in others, it is an aromatic carbon atom. For carbon-centered nucleophiles, a quantitative mechanistic model based on a combination of Hammett σ<sup>+</sup> and logP values has been derived. This has been applied to rationalize several groups of known sensitizers with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, including anacardic acids and cardols, which are known human sensitizers associated with, inter alia, cashew nut oil, mango, and <i>Ginkgo biloba</i>. The possibility of nucleophilic sensitization needs to be considered when evaluating new chemicals for skin sensitization potential and potency by nonanimal assays, particularly those based on the premise that skin sensitization is dependent upon reactions of electrophiles with skin protein-based nucleophiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":"37 11","pages":"1757–1768 1757–1768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00207","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updating Reaction Mechanistic Domains for Skin Sensitization: 1. Nucleophilic Skin Sensitizers\",\"authors\":\"David W. Roberts*,&nbsp;Anne Marie Api,&nbsp;Aynur Aptula,&nbsp;Isabelle Lee and Holger Moustakas,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c0020710.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >It has long been recognized that skin sensitizers either are electrophilic or can be activated to electrophilic species. Several nonanimal assays for skin sensitization are based on this premise. In the course of a project to update dermal sensitization thresholds (DST), we found a substantial number of sensitizers, with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, that could be simply explained in terms of the sensitizer acting as a nucleophile. In some cases, the nucleophilic center is a sulfur or phosphorus atom, while in others, it is an aromatic carbon atom. For carbon-centered nucleophiles, a quantitative mechanistic model based on a combination of Hammett σ<sup>+</sup> and logP values has been derived. This has been applied to rationalize several groups of known sensitizers with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, including anacardic acids and cardols, which are known human sensitizers associated with, inter alia, cashew nut oil, mango, and <i>Ginkgo biloba</i>. The possibility of nucleophilic sensitization needs to be considered when evaluating new chemicals for skin sensitization potential and potency by nonanimal assays, particularly those based on the premise that skin sensitization is dependent upon reactions of electrophiles with skin protein-based nucleophiles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"37 11\",\"pages\":\"1757–1768 1757–1768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00207\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00207\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们早已认识到,皮肤致敏物质要么是亲电的,要么可以活化为亲电物种。几种非动物皮肤过敏检测方法都是基于这一前提。在更新皮肤过敏阈值(DST)的项目过程中,我们发现有相当多的敏化剂没有亲电或亲电警报,可以简单地用敏化剂作为亲核体来解释。在某些情况下,亲核中心是一个硫或磷原子,而在另一些情况下,亲核中心是一个芳香碳原子。对于以碳为中心的亲核物,我们已根据哈米特 σ+ 和 logP 值的组合推导出一个定量机理模型。该模型已被用于合理解释几组没有亲电或亲电警报的已知敏化剂,包括无铬酸和棉酚,它们是与腰果油、芒果和银杏叶等有关的已知人体敏化剂。在通过非动物实验评估新化学品的皮肤致敏潜力和效力时,需要考虑亲核致敏的可能性,特别是那些以皮肤致敏取决于亲电体与皮肤蛋白质亲核物的反应为前提的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Updating Reaction Mechanistic Domains for Skin Sensitization: 1. Nucleophilic Skin Sensitizers

It has long been recognized that skin sensitizers either are electrophilic or can be activated to electrophilic species. Several nonanimal assays for skin sensitization are based on this premise. In the course of a project to update dermal sensitization thresholds (DST), we found a substantial number of sensitizers, with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, that could be simply explained in terms of the sensitizer acting as a nucleophile. In some cases, the nucleophilic center is a sulfur or phosphorus atom, while in others, it is an aromatic carbon atom. For carbon-centered nucleophiles, a quantitative mechanistic model based on a combination of Hammett σ+ and logP values has been derived. This has been applied to rationalize several groups of known sensitizers with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, including anacardic acids and cardols, which are known human sensitizers associated with, inter alia, cashew nut oil, mango, and Ginkgo biloba. The possibility of nucleophilic sensitization needs to be considered when evaluating new chemicals for skin sensitization potential and potency by nonanimal assays, particularly those based on the premise that skin sensitization is dependent upon reactions of electrophiles with skin protein-based nucleophiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
期刊最新文献
Zebrafish Larvae as a Predictive Model for the Risk of Chemical-Induced Cholestasis: Phenotypic Evaluation and Nomogram Formation. Elucidating the Metabolism of Chiral PCB95 in Wildtype and Transgenic Mouse Models with Altered Cytochrome P450 Enzymes Using Intestinal Content Screening. Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Toxicity of Bromo-DragonFLY as a New Psychoactive Substance: Application of In Silico Methods for the Prediction of Key Toxicological Parameters Important to Clinical and Forensic Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1