利用 q 级模糊偏好排序影响医疗保健行业清洁能源利用的障碍的决策框架

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3488325
Raghunathan Krishankumar;Dhruva Sundararajan;Muhammet Deveci;K. S. Ravichandran;Xin Wen;Bilal Bahaa Zaidan
{"title":"利用 q 级模糊偏好排序影响医疗保健行业清洁能源利用的障碍的决策框架","authors":"Raghunathan Krishankumar;Dhruva Sundararajan;Muhammet Deveci;K. S. Ravichandran;Xin Wen;Bilal Bahaa Zaidan","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3488325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we aim to rank barriers hindering clean energy adoption within the healthcare industry by proposing a new framework with q-rung orthopair fuzzy data (q-ROFD). Energy is paramount in health industry, and it is estimated by the World Health Organization that nearly a billion people are treated globally with limited/no electricity. United Nation strongly recommends cutting dependencies on fossil fuels, but to meet demand, clean energy is focused. Studies on clean energies reveal that direct adoption is tough, owing to diverse barriers and ranking these barriers will provide policymakers clarity on the strategic plans. Existing studies reveal gaps in uncertainty modeling by not adequately exploring orthopair variants, human intervention reduction by failing to methodically determine diverse decision parameters, consideration of subjective attitude and interactions among entities that are essential for experts and attributes, and accounting for attribute type and yielding ranks comparable with a human decision. Motivated by the gaps, in this article, a combined q-ROFD model is presented where weights of attributes are determined via criteria importance through intercriteria correlation and rank sum and experts’ weights are obtained by rank sum. A ranking algorithm is developed with CODAS formulation for determining the barriers’ grades with risk aversion trait. The significance of the study lies in rational ranking of barriers, reduced human intervention, and methodical determination of decision parameters. The usefulness of the model is testified via a case study of barrier ranking within the Indian healthcare industry and comparison/sensitivity studies reveal the pros and cons of the developed model.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"15349-15362"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Decision Framework With q-Rung Fuzzy Preferences for Ranking Barriers Affecting Clean Energy Utilization Within Healthcare Industry\",\"authors\":\"Raghunathan Krishankumar;Dhruva Sundararajan;Muhammet Deveci;K. S. Ravichandran;Xin Wen;Bilal Bahaa Zaidan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2024.3488325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we aim to rank barriers hindering clean energy adoption within the healthcare industry by proposing a new framework with q-rung orthopair fuzzy data (q-ROFD). Energy is paramount in health industry, and it is estimated by the World Health Organization that nearly a billion people are treated globally with limited/no electricity. United Nation strongly recommends cutting dependencies on fossil fuels, but to meet demand, clean energy is focused. Studies on clean energies reveal that direct adoption is tough, owing to diverse barriers and ranking these barriers will provide policymakers clarity on the strategic plans. Existing studies reveal gaps in uncertainty modeling by not adequately exploring orthopair variants, human intervention reduction by failing to methodically determine diverse decision parameters, consideration of subjective attitude and interactions among entities that are essential for experts and attributes, and accounting for attribute type and yielding ranks comparable with a human decision. Motivated by the gaps, in this article, a combined q-ROFD model is presented where weights of attributes are determined via criteria importance through intercriteria correlation and rank sum and experts’ weights are obtained by rank sum. A ranking algorithm is developed with CODAS formulation for determining the barriers’ grades with risk aversion trait. The significance of the study lies in rational ranking of barriers, reduced human intervention, and methodical determination of decision parameters. The usefulness of the model is testified via a case study of barrier ranking within the Indian healthcare industry and comparison/sensitivity studies reveal the pros and cons of the developed model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"15349-15362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10738492/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10738492/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们旨在通过提出一个采用 q-rung orthopair 模糊数据(q-ROFD)的新框架,对阻碍医疗保健行业采用清洁能源的障碍进行排序。能源在医疗行业中至关重要,据世界卫生组织估计,全球有近十亿人在用电有限或无电的情况下接受治疗。联合国强烈建议减少对化石燃料的依赖,但为了满足需求,清洁能源是重点。有关清洁能源的研究表明,由于存在各种障碍,直接采用清洁能源非常困难。现有研究揭示了在不确定性建模方面存在的差距,如未充分探索正交模型的变体、未有条不紊地确定各种决策参数以减少人为干预、未考虑对专家和属性至关重要的主观态度和实体间的相互作用,以及未考虑属性类型并得出与人为决策相当的等级。鉴于上述不足,本文提出了一种组合式 q-ROFD 模型,其中属性权重通过标准间相关性和等级总和的标准重要性确定,专家权重则通过等级总和获得。利用 CODAS 公式开发了一种排序算法,用于确定具有风险规避特征的障碍等级。该研究的意义在于对障碍进行合理排序,减少人为干预,并有条不紊地确定决策参数。该模型的实用性通过印度医疗保健行业的障碍排序案例研究得到了验证,对比/敏感性研究揭示了所开发模型的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Decision Framework With q-Rung Fuzzy Preferences for Ranking Barriers Affecting Clean Energy Utilization Within Healthcare Industry
In this article, we aim to rank barriers hindering clean energy adoption within the healthcare industry by proposing a new framework with q-rung orthopair fuzzy data (q-ROFD). Energy is paramount in health industry, and it is estimated by the World Health Organization that nearly a billion people are treated globally with limited/no electricity. United Nation strongly recommends cutting dependencies on fossil fuels, but to meet demand, clean energy is focused. Studies on clean energies reveal that direct adoption is tough, owing to diverse barriers and ranking these barriers will provide policymakers clarity on the strategic plans. Existing studies reveal gaps in uncertainty modeling by not adequately exploring orthopair variants, human intervention reduction by failing to methodically determine diverse decision parameters, consideration of subjective attitude and interactions among entities that are essential for experts and attributes, and accounting for attribute type and yielding ranks comparable with a human decision. Motivated by the gaps, in this article, a combined q-ROFD model is presented where weights of attributes are determined via criteria importance through intercriteria correlation and rank sum and experts’ weights are obtained by rank sum. A ranking algorithm is developed with CODAS formulation for determining the barriers’ grades with risk aversion trait. The significance of the study lies in rational ranking of barriers, reduced human intervention, and methodical determination of decision parameters. The usefulness of the model is testified via a case study of barrier ranking within the Indian healthcare industry and comparison/sensitivity studies reveal the pros and cons of the developed model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
Catch-Up in Complex Products and Systems: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry A Decision Framework With q-Rung Fuzzy Preferences for Ranking Barriers Affecting Clean Energy Utilization Within Healthcare Industry Can the Input of Data Elements Improve Manufacturing Productivity? Effect Measurement and Path Analysis A Taxonomy-Based Data Model for Assessing Engineering Skills in an Organizational Context Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Influencing Factors of MES Implementation in Zero Defect Management Enterprises in Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1