气候模式趋势误差在短时季节预测中很明显

IF 8.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1038/s41612-024-00832-w
Jonathan D. Beverley, Matthew Newman, Andrew Hoell
{"title":"气候模式趋势误差在短时季节预测中很明显","authors":"Jonathan D. Beverley, Matthew Newman, Andrew Hoell","doi":"10.1038/s41612-024-00832-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate models exhibit errors in their simulation of historical trends of variables including sea surface temperature, winds, and precipitation, with important implications for regional and global climate projections. Here, we show that the same trend errors are also present in a suite of initialised seasonal re-forecasts for the years 1993–2016. These re-forecasts are produced by operational models that are similar to Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP)-class models and share their historical external forcings (e.g. CO2/aerosols). The trend errors, which are often well-developed at very short lead times, represent a roughly linear change in the model mean biases over the 1993–2016 re-forecast record. The similarity of trend errors in both the re-forecasts and historical simulations suggests that climate model trend errors likewise result from evolving mean biases, responding to changing external radiative forcings, instead of being an erroneous long-term response to external forcing. Therefore, these trend errors may be investigated by examining their short-lead development in initialised seasonal forecasts/re-forecasts, which we suggest should also be made by all CMIP models.","PeriodicalId":19438,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00832-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate model trend errors are evident in seasonal forecasts at short leads\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan D. Beverley, Matthew Newman, Andrew Hoell\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41612-024-00832-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Climate models exhibit errors in their simulation of historical trends of variables including sea surface temperature, winds, and precipitation, with important implications for regional and global climate projections. Here, we show that the same trend errors are also present in a suite of initialised seasonal re-forecasts for the years 1993–2016. These re-forecasts are produced by operational models that are similar to Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP)-class models and share their historical external forcings (e.g. CO2/aerosols). The trend errors, which are often well-developed at very short lead times, represent a roughly linear change in the model mean biases over the 1993–2016 re-forecast record. The similarity of trend errors in both the re-forecasts and historical simulations suggests that climate model trend errors likewise result from evolving mean biases, responding to changing external radiative forcings, instead of being an erroneous long-term response to external forcing. Therefore, these trend errors may be investigated by examining their short-lead development in initialised seasonal forecasts/re-forecasts, which we suggest should also be made by all CMIP models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00832-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00832-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00832-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候模式在模拟海面温度、风和降水等变量的历史趋势时会出现误差,这对区域和全球气候预测有重要影响。在此,我们展示了 1993-2016 年的一套初始化季节再预测也存在同样的趋势误差。这些再预测由与耦合模式相互比较项目(CMIP)类模式相似的业务模式生成,并共享其历史外部作用力(如二氧化碳/气溶胶)。在 1993-2016 年的再预报记录中,趋势误差通常在很短的前导时间内就会形成,代表了模式平均偏差的大致线性变化。重新预测和历史模拟中趋势误差的相似性表明,气候模式趋势误差同样是由不断变化的平均偏差引起的,是对不断变化的外部辐射强迫的响应,而不是对外部强迫的长期错误响应。因此,这些趋势误差可以通过研究其在初始化季节预报/再预报中的短时发展来研究,我们建议所有的 CMIP 模式也应该这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Climate model trend errors are evident in seasonal forecasts at short leads
Climate models exhibit errors in their simulation of historical trends of variables including sea surface temperature, winds, and precipitation, with important implications for regional and global climate projections. Here, we show that the same trend errors are also present in a suite of initialised seasonal re-forecasts for the years 1993–2016. These re-forecasts are produced by operational models that are similar to Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP)-class models and share their historical external forcings (e.g. CO2/aerosols). The trend errors, which are often well-developed at very short lead times, represent a roughly linear change in the model mean biases over the 1993–2016 re-forecast record. The similarity of trend errors in both the re-forecasts and historical simulations suggests that climate model trend errors likewise result from evolving mean biases, responding to changing external radiative forcings, instead of being an erroneous long-term response to external forcing. Therefore, these trend errors may be investigated by examining their short-lead development in initialised seasonal forecasts/re-forecasts, which we suggest should also be made by all CMIP models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
87
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Climate and Atmospheric Science is an open-access journal encompassing the relevant physical, chemical, and biological aspects of atmospheric and climate science. The journal places particular emphasis on regional studies that unveil new insights into specific localities, including examinations of local atmospheric composition, such as aerosols. The range of topics covered by the journal includes climate dynamics, climate variability, weather and climate prediction, climate change, ocean dynamics, weather extremes, air pollution, atmospheric chemistry (including aerosols), the hydrological cycle, and atmosphere–ocean and atmosphere–land interactions. The journal welcomes studies employing a diverse array of methods, including numerical and statistical modeling, the development and application of in situ observational techniques, remote sensing, and the development or evaluation of new reanalyses.
期刊最新文献
Mortality burden of diabetes attributable to high temperature and heatwave under climate change scenarios in China Impact of fuel sulfur regulations on carbonaceous particle emission from a marine engine A new global carbon flux estimation methodology by assimilation of both in situ and satellite CO2 observations Dominance of open burning signatures in PM2.5 near coal plant should redefine pollutant priorities of India Climate model trend errors are evident in seasonal forecasts at short leads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1