AMYPAD联盟针对临床使用环境提出的Centiloid建议

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1002/alz.14336
Lyduine E. Collij, Ariane Bollack, Renaud La Joie, Mahnaz Shekari, Santiago Bullich, Núria Roé-Vellvé, Norman Koglin, Aleksandar Jovalekic, David Valléz Garciá, Alexander Drzezga, Valentina Garibotto, Andrew W. Stephens, Mark Battle, Christopher Buckley, Frederik Barkhof, Gill Farrar, Juan Domingo Gispert
{"title":"AMYPAD联盟针对临床使用环境提出的Centiloid建议","authors":"Lyduine E. Collij, Ariane Bollack, Renaud La Joie, Mahnaz Shekari, Santiago Bullich, Núria Roé-Vellvé, Norman Koglin, Aleksandar Jovalekic, David Valléz Garciá, Alexander Drzezga, Valentina Garibotto, Andrew W. Stephens, Mark Battle, Christopher Buckley, Frederik Barkhof, Gill Farrar, Juan Domingo Gispert","doi":"10.1002/alz.14336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amyloid-PET quantification through the tracer-independent Centiloid (CL) scale has emerged as an essential tool for the accurate measurement of amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. The AMYPAD consortium set out to integrate existing literature and recent work from the consortium to provide clinical context-of-use recommendations for the CL scale. Compared to histopathology, visual reads, and cerebrospinal fluid, CL quantification accurately reflects the amount of AD pathology. With high certainty, a CL value below 10 excludes the presence of Aβ pathology, while a value above 30 corresponds well with pathological amounts. Values falling in between these two cutoffs (“intermediate range”) are related to an increased risk of disease progression. Together, CL quantification is a valuable adjunct to visual assessments of amyloid-PET images. An abnormal amyloid biomarker assessment is a key criterion to determine eligibility for anti-amyloid disease-modifying therapies, and amyloid-PET quantification can add further value by precisely monitoring amyloid clearance, and hence guiding patient management decisions.","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centiloid recommendations for clinical context-of-use from the AMYPAD consortium\",\"authors\":\"Lyduine E. Collij, Ariane Bollack, Renaud La Joie, Mahnaz Shekari, Santiago Bullich, Núria Roé-Vellvé, Norman Koglin, Aleksandar Jovalekic, David Valléz Garciá, Alexander Drzezga, Valentina Garibotto, Andrew W. Stephens, Mark Battle, Christopher Buckley, Frederik Barkhof, Gill Farrar, Juan Domingo Gispert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.14336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Amyloid-PET quantification through the tracer-independent Centiloid (CL) scale has emerged as an essential tool for the accurate measurement of amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. The AMYPAD consortium set out to integrate existing literature and recent work from the consortium to provide clinical context-of-use recommendations for the CL scale. Compared to histopathology, visual reads, and cerebrospinal fluid, CL quantification accurately reflects the amount of AD pathology. With high certainty, a CL value below 10 excludes the presence of Aβ pathology, while a value above 30 corresponds well with pathological amounts. Values falling in between these two cutoffs (“intermediate range”) are related to an increased risk of disease progression. Together, CL quantification is a valuable adjunct to visual assessments of amyloid-PET images. An abnormal amyloid biomarker assessment is a key criterion to determine eligibility for anti-amyloid disease-modifying therapies, and amyloid-PET quantification can add further value by precisely monitoring amyloid clearance, and hence guiding patient management decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14336\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14336","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过与示踪剂无关的Centiloid(CL)量表进行淀粉样蛋白-PET定量已成为准确测量阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者淀粉样蛋白-β(Aβ)病理的重要工具。AMYPAD 联合会着手整合现有文献和该联合会近期的工作,为 CL 量表提供临床使用建议。与组织病理学、肉眼读数和脑脊液相比,CL 定量能准确反映出 AD 病变的程度。在高度确定的情况下,CL 值低于 10 就排除了 Aβ 病变的存在,而高于 30 则与病理量十分吻合。介于这两个临界值("中间范围")之间的值与疾病进展风险增加有关。总之,CL 定量是淀粉样蛋白-PET 图像视觉评估的重要辅助手段。淀粉样蛋白生物标志物评估异常是确定是否有资格接受抗淀粉样蛋白疾病改变疗法的一个关键标准,而淀粉样蛋白-PET定量可通过精确监测淀粉样蛋白清除率进一步增加价值,从而指导患者管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Centiloid recommendations for clinical context-of-use from the AMYPAD consortium
Amyloid-PET quantification through the tracer-independent Centiloid (CL) scale has emerged as an essential tool for the accurate measurement of amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. The AMYPAD consortium set out to integrate existing literature and recent work from the consortium to provide clinical context-of-use recommendations for the CL scale. Compared to histopathology, visual reads, and cerebrospinal fluid, CL quantification accurately reflects the amount of AD pathology. With high certainty, a CL value below 10 excludes the presence of Aβ pathology, while a value above 30 corresponds well with pathological amounts. Values falling in between these two cutoffs (“intermediate range”) are related to an increased risk of disease progression. Together, CL quantification is a valuable adjunct to visual assessments of amyloid-PET images. An abnormal amyloid biomarker assessment is a key criterion to determine eligibility for anti-amyloid disease-modifying therapies, and amyloid-PET quantification can add further value by precisely monitoring amyloid clearance, and hence guiding patient management decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling reveals altered responses to diesel emissions in Alzheimer's disease both in vitro and in population-based data Midlife and late-life environmental exposures on dementia risk in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study: The modifying effects of ApoE Benchmarking of a multi-biomarker low-volume panel for Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research The contribution of cerebral small vessel disease in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Insights from a prospective cohort study APOE ε4-associated heterogeneity of neuroimaging biomarkers across the Alzheimer's disease continuum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1