{"title":"日出期观测到的太阳黑子异常斯托克斯V剖面图","authors":"H. Hamedivafa, R. Rezaei","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202450625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Context.<i/> Hidden magnetic components in a sunspot are present as small-scale structures that are absent in low-resolution observations.<i>Aims.<i/> We search for traces of the hidden magnetic components in spectro-polarimetric observations of a mature sunspot close to the disk center recorded by Hinode.<i>Methods.<i/> To find extra humps in the far blue and red lobes of Stokes <i>V<i/>, we examined the sign reversal in the second derivative of the profile in the umbra and penumbra. We also looked for the hump signature in the Stokes <i>I<i/> and the linear polarization profiles.<i>Results.<i/> The amplitudes of the humps are small compared to the main component. More than half of the profiles show one extra hump, while 21% show an extra hump on both the blue and the red lobe of the 630.15 nm line with the same magnetic polarity as the sunspot. The location of the pixels where the extra hump is seen on both lobes has a pseudo-grainy structure in the single wavelength Stokes <i>V<i/> magnetograms. This type of profile is better detected in darker parts of the penumbra, as well as in the umbra-penumbra border toward the umbra. The spectral distance between the two humps averaged over elliptical rings levels off in the umbra, decreases toward the penumbra, and levels off again there. We find no correlations between the wavelength positions of the two humps.<i>Conclusions.<i/> We discuss two scenarios that could potentially produce the simultaneously observed blue and red humps: one in which a single hidden magnetic component is responsible for the two humps, and another in which the two humps emanate from two hidden magnetic components.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abnormal Stokes V profiles observed by Hinode in a sunspot\",\"authors\":\"H. Hamedivafa, R. Rezaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/0004-6361/202450625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<i>Context.<i/> Hidden magnetic components in a sunspot are present as small-scale structures that are absent in low-resolution observations.<i>Aims.<i/> We search for traces of the hidden magnetic components in spectro-polarimetric observations of a mature sunspot close to the disk center recorded by Hinode.<i>Methods.<i/> To find extra humps in the far blue and red lobes of Stokes <i>V<i/>, we examined the sign reversal in the second derivative of the profile in the umbra and penumbra. We also looked for the hump signature in the Stokes <i>I<i/> and the linear polarization profiles.<i>Results.<i/> The amplitudes of the humps are small compared to the main component. More than half of the profiles show one extra hump, while 21% show an extra hump on both the blue and the red lobe of the 630.15 nm line with the same magnetic polarity as the sunspot. The location of the pixels where the extra hump is seen on both lobes has a pseudo-grainy structure in the single wavelength Stokes <i>V<i/> magnetograms. This type of profile is better detected in darker parts of the penumbra, as well as in the umbra-penumbra border toward the umbra. The spectral distance between the two humps averaged over elliptical rings levels off in the umbra, decreases toward the penumbra, and levels off again there. We find no correlations between the wavelength positions of the two humps.<i>Conclusions.<i/> We discuss two scenarios that could potentially produce the simultaneously observed blue and red humps: one in which a single hidden magnetic component is responsible for the two humps, and another in which the two humps emanate from two hidden magnetic components.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450625\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景。太阳黑子中的隐磁成分是作为小尺度结构存在的,在低分辨率观测中是不存在的。我们在日冕记录的靠近磁盘中心的成熟太阳黑子的光谱偏振观测中寻找隐藏磁成分的踪迹。为了在斯托克斯五号的远蓝叶和红叶中找到额外的驼峰,我们检查了本影和半影剖面二阶导数的符号反转。我们还在斯托克斯 I 和线性偏振剖面中寻找驼峰特征。与主成分相比,驼峰的振幅很小。超过一半的剖面图显示出一个额外的驼峰,而 21% 的剖面图在 630.15 nm 线的蓝叶和红叶上都显示出一个额外的驼峰,其磁极性与太阳黑子相同。在单波长斯托克斯 V 磁图中,在两个叶片上都出现额外驼峰的像素位置具有伪颗粒状结构。在半影的较暗部分以及向本影方向的本影-半影边界,这种剖面的探测效果更好。椭圆环上平均的两个驼峰之间的光谱距离在本影处趋于平稳,向半影处减小,在那里又趋于平稳。我们发现两个驼峰的波长位置之间没有关联。我们讨论了可能产生同时观测到的蓝色和红色驼峰的两种情况:一种情况是两个驼峰由一个隐藏的磁性成分产生,另一种情况是两个驼峰由两个隐藏的磁性成分产生。
Abnormal Stokes V profiles observed by Hinode in a sunspot
Context. Hidden magnetic components in a sunspot are present as small-scale structures that are absent in low-resolution observations.Aims. We search for traces of the hidden magnetic components in spectro-polarimetric observations of a mature sunspot close to the disk center recorded by Hinode.Methods. To find extra humps in the far blue and red lobes of Stokes V, we examined the sign reversal in the second derivative of the profile in the umbra and penumbra. We also looked for the hump signature in the Stokes I and the linear polarization profiles.Results. The amplitudes of the humps are small compared to the main component. More than half of the profiles show one extra hump, while 21% show an extra hump on both the blue and the red lobe of the 630.15 nm line with the same magnetic polarity as the sunspot. The location of the pixels where the extra hump is seen on both lobes has a pseudo-grainy structure in the single wavelength Stokes V magnetograms. This type of profile is better detected in darker parts of the penumbra, as well as in the umbra-penumbra border toward the umbra. The spectral distance between the two humps averaged over elliptical rings levels off in the umbra, decreases toward the penumbra, and levels off again there. We find no correlations between the wavelength positions of the two humps.Conclusions. We discuss two scenarios that could potentially produce the simultaneously observed blue and red humps: one in which a single hidden magnetic component is responsible for the two humps, and another in which the two humps emanate from two hidden magnetic components.
期刊介绍:
Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.