Qin Qin Huang, Emilie M. Wigdor, Daniel S. Malawsky, Patrick Campbell, Kaitlin E. Samocha, V. Kartik Chundru, Petr Danecek, Sarah Lindsay, Thomas Marchant, Mahmoud Koko, Sana Amanat, Davide Bonfanti, Eamonn Sheridan, Elizabeth J. Radford, Jeffrey C. Barrett, Caroline F. Wright, Helen V. Firth, Varun Warrier, Alexander Strudwick Young, Matthew E. Hurles, Hilary C. Martin
{"title":"研究常见变异在罕见神经发育疾病中的作用","authors":"Qin Qin Huang, Emilie M. Wigdor, Daniel S. Malawsky, Patrick Campbell, Kaitlin E. Samocha, V. Kartik Chundru, Petr Danecek, Sarah Lindsay, Thomas Marchant, Mahmoud Koko, Sana Amanat, Davide Bonfanti, Eamonn Sheridan, Elizabeth J. Radford, Jeffrey C. Barrett, Caroline F. Wright, Helen V. Firth, Varun Warrier, Alexander Strudwick Young, Matthew E. Hurles, Hilary C. Martin","doi":"10.1038/s41586-024-08217-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although rare neurodevelopmental conditions have a large Mendelian component<sup>1</sup>, common genetic variants also contribute to risk<sup>2,3</sup>. However, little is known about how this polygenic risk is distributed among patients with these conditions and their parents nor its interplay with rare variants. It is also unclear whether polygenic background affects risk directly through alleles transmitted from parents to children, or whether indirect genetic effects mediated through the family environment<sup>4</sup> also play a role. Here we addressed these questions using genetic data from 11,573 patients with rare neurodevelopmental conditions, 9,128 of their parents and 26,869 controls. Common variants explained around 10% of variance in risk. Patients with a monogenic diagnosis had significantly less polygenic risk than those without, supporting a liability threshold model<sup>5</sup>. A polygenic score for neurodevelopmental conditions showed only a direct genetic effect. By contrast, polygenic scores for educational attainment and cognitive performance showed no direct genetic effect, but the non-transmitted alleles in the parents were correlated with the child’s risk, potentially due to indirect genetic effects and/or parental assortment for these traits<sup>4</sup>. Indeed, as expected under parental assortment, we show that common variant predisposition for neurodevelopmental conditions is correlated with the rare variant component of risk. These findings indicate that future studies should investigate the possible role and nature of indirect genetic effects on rare neurodevelopmental conditions, and consider the contribution of common and rare variants simultaneously when studying cognition-related phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18787,"journal":{"name":"Nature","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the role of common variants in rare neurodevelopmental conditions\",\"authors\":\"Qin Qin Huang, Emilie M. Wigdor, Daniel S. Malawsky, Patrick Campbell, Kaitlin E. Samocha, V. Kartik Chundru, Petr Danecek, Sarah Lindsay, Thomas Marchant, Mahmoud Koko, Sana Amanat, Davide Bonfanti, Eamonn Sheridan, Elizabeth J. Radford, Jeffrey C. Barrett, Caroline F. Wright, Helen V. Firth, Varun Warrier, Alexander Strudwick Young, Matthew E. Hurles, Hilary C. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41586-024-08217-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although rare neurodevelopmental conditions have a large Mendelian component<sup>1</sup>, common genetic variants also contribute to risk<sup>2,3</sup>. However, little is known about how this polygenic risk is distributed among patients with these conditions and their parents nor its interplay with rare variants. It is also unclear whether polygenic background affects risk directly through alleles transmitted from parents to children, or whether indirect genetic effects mediated through the family environment<sup>4</sup> also play a role. Here we addressed these questions using genetic data from 11,573 patients with rare neurodevelopmental conditions, 9,128 of their parents and 26,869 controls. Common variants explained around 10% of variance in risk. Patients with a monogenic diagnosis had significantly less polygenic risk than those without, supporting a liability threshold model<sup>5</sup>. A polygenic score for neurodevelopmental conditions showed only a direct genetic effect. By contrast, polygenic scores for educational attainment and cognitive performance showed no direct genetic effect, but the non-transmitted alleles in the parents were correlated with the child’s risk, potentially due to indirect genetic effects and/or parental assortment for these traits<sup>4</sup>. Indeed, as expected under parental assortment, we show that common variant predisposition for neurodevelopmental conditions is correlated with the rare variant component of risk. These findings indicate that future studies should investigate the possible role and nature of indirect genetic effects on rare neurodevelopmental conditions, and consider the contribution of common and rare variants simultaneously when studying cognition-related phenotypes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08217-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08217-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining the role of common variants in rare neurodevelopmental conditions
Although rare neurodevelopmental conditions have a large Mendelian component1, common genetic variants also contribute to risk2,3. However, little is known about how this polygenic risk is distributed among patients with these conditions and their parents nor its interplay with rare variants. It is also unclear whether polygenic background affects risk directly through alleles transmitted from parents to children, or whether indirect genetic effects mediated through the family environment4 also play a role. Here we addressed these questions using genetic data from 11,573 patients with rare neurodevelopmental conditions, 9,128 of their parents and 26,869 controls. Common variants explained around 10% of variance in risk. Patients with a monogenic diagnosis had significantly less polygenic risk than those without, supporting a liability threshold model5. A polygenic score for neurodevelopmental conditions showed only a direct genetic effect. By contrast, polygenic scores for educational attainment and cognitive performance showed no direct genetic effect, but the non-transmitted alleles in the parents were correlated with the child’s risk, potentially due to indirect genetic effects and/or parental assortment for these traits4. Indeed, as expected under parental assortment, we show that common variant predisposition for neurodevelopmental conditions is correlated with the rare variant component of risk. These findings indicate that future studies should investigate the possible role and nature of indirect genetic effects on rare neurodevelopmental conditions, and consider the contribution of common and rare variants simultaneously when studying cognition-related phenotypes.
期刊介绍:
Nature is a prestigious international journal that publishes peer-reviewed research in various scientific and technological fields. The selection of articles is based on criteria such as originality, importance, interdisciplinary relevance, timeliness, accessibility, elegance, and surprising conclusions. In addition to showcasing significant scientific advances, Nature delivers rapid, authoritative, insightful news, and interpretation of current and upcoming trends impacting science, scientists, and the broader public. The journal serves a dual purpose: firstly, to promptly share noteworthy scientific advances and foster discussions among scientists, and secondly, to ensure the swift dissemination of scientific results globally, emphasizing their significance for knowledge, culture, and daily life.