评估药物代谢和运输的体内数据:从基尔霍夫定律中汲取的教训。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1456677
Leslie Z Benet, Jasleen K Sodhi
{"title":"评估药物代谢和运输的体内数据:从基尔霍夫定律中汲取的教训。","authors":"Leslie Z Benet, Jasleen K Sodhi","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2024.1456677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanistic models of hepatic clearance have been evaluated for more than 50 years, with the first author of this mini-review serving as a co-author of the first paper proposing such a model. However, published quality experimental data are only consistent with the first of these models, designated as the well-stirred model, despite the universal recognition that this model is physiologically unrepresentative of what occurs with respect to liver metabolism and transport. Within the last 3 years, our laboratory has recognized that it is possible to derive clearance equations employing the concepts of Kirchhoff's Laws from physics, independent of the differential equation approach that has been utilized to derive reaction rates in chemistry. Here we review our published studies showing that the equation previously believed to be the well-stirred model, when hepatic basolateral transporters are not clinically relevant, is in fact the general equation for hepatic clearance when only systemic drug concentrations are measured, explaining why all experimental data fit this equation. To demonstrate that the equations deriving the mechanistic models of hepatic elimination for the past 50 years are not valid, we show that when calculating Kp<sub>uu</sub>, the ratio of unbound drug concentration in the liver to the unbound concentration of drug in the systemic circulation, for the well-stirred, parallel tube and dispersion models, Kp<sub>uu</sub> surprisingly can never exceed 1 and is a function of F<sub>H</sub>, the hepatic bioavailability following oral dosing. We believe that knowledgeable drug metabolism scientist and clinical pharmacologist will agree that this outcome is nonsensical.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1456677"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating <i>in vivo</i> data for drug metabolism and transport: lessons from Kirchhoff's Laws.\",\"authors\":\"Leslie Z Benet, Jasleen K Sodhi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphar.2024.1456677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mechanistic models of hepatic clearance have been evaluated for more than 50 years, with the first author of this mini-review serving as a co-author of the first paper proposing such a model. However, published quality experimental data are only consistent with the first of these models, designated as the well-stirred model, despite the universal recognition that this model is physiologically unrepresentative of what occurs with respect to liver metabolism and transport. Within the last 3 years, our laboratory has recognized that it is possible to derive clearance equations employing the concepts of Kirchhoff's Laws from physics, independent of the differential equation approach that has been utilized to derive reaction rates in chemistry. Here we review our published studies showing that the equation previously believed to be the well-stirred model, when hepatic basolateral transporters are not clinically relevant, is in fact the general equation for hepatic clearance when only systemic drug concentrations are measured, explaining why all experimental data fit this equation. To demonstrate that the equations deriving the mechanistic models of hepatic elimination for the past 50 years are not valid, we show that when calculating Kp<sub>uu</sub>, the ratio of unbound drug concentration in the liver to the unbound concentration of drug in the systemic circulation, for the well-stirred, parallel tube and dispersion models, Kp<sub>uu</sub> surprisingly can never exceed 1 and is a function of F<sub>H</sub>, the hepatic bioavailability following oral dosing. We believe that knowledgeable drug metabolism scientist and clinical pharmacologist will agree that this outcome is nonsensical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1456677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1456677\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1456677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对肝清除机制模型的评估已有 50 多年的历史,本微型综述的第一作者是第一篇提出这种模型的论文的合著者。然而,已发表的高质量实验数据只与这些模型中的第一个模型(即搅动模型)相一致,尽管人们普遍认为该模型不能反映肝脏代谢和转运的生理过程。在过去 3 年中,我们实验室认识到,可以利用物理学中的基尔霍夫定律概念推导出清除方程,而不依赖于用于推导化学反应速率的微分方程方法。在此,我们回顾了已发表的研究结果,这些研究结果表明,在肝脏基底侧转运体与临床无关的情况下,以前被认为是搅匀模型的方程实际上是只测量全身药物浓度时肝脏清除率的一般方程,这也解释了为什么所有实验数据都符合这个方程。为了证明过去 50 年来推导肝脏消除机理模型的方程是无效的,我们证明了在计算 Kpuu(肝脏中未结合药物浓度与全身循环中未结合药物浓度之比)时,对于搅拌良好、平行管和分散模型,Kpuu 令人惊讶地永远不会超过 1,并且是 FH(口服后肝脏生物利用度)的函数。我们相信,知识渊博的药物代谢科学家和临床药理学家都会同意,这一结果是毫无道理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating in vivo data for drug metabolism and transport: lessons from Kirchhoff's Laws.

Mechanistic models of hepatic clearance have been evaluated for more than 50 years, with the first author of this mini-review serving as a co-author of the first paper proposing such a model. However, published quality experimental data are only consistent with the first of these models, designated as the well-stirred model, despite the universal recognition that this model is physiologically unrepresentative of what occurs with respect to liver metabolism and transport. Within the last 3 years, our laboratory has recognized that it is possible to derive clearance equations employing the concepts of Kirchhoff's Laws from physics, independent of the differential equation approach that has been utilized to derive reaction rates in chemistry. Here we review our published studies showing that the equation previously believed to be the well-stirred model, when hepatic basolateral transporters are not clinically relevant, is in fact the general equation for hepatic clearance when only systemic drug concentrations are measured, explaining why all experimental data fit this equation. To demonstrate that the equations deriving the mechanistic models of hepatic elimination for the past 50 years are not valid, we show that when calculating Kpuu, the ratio of unbound drug concentration in the liver to the unbound concentration of drug in the systemic circulation, for the well-stirred, parallel tube and dispersion models, Kpuu surprisingly can never exceed 1 and is a function of FH, the hepatic bioavailability following oral dosing. We believe that knowledgeable drug metabolism scientist and clinical pharmacologist will agree that this outcome is nonsensical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
ER stress-induced YAP upregulation leads to chondrocyte phenotype loss in age-related osteoarthritis. OATP1A2 mediates Aβ1-42 transport and may be a novel target for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Preparation and anti-colon cancer effect of a novel curcumin analogue (CA8): in vivo and in vitro evaluation. Salidroside ameliorates cerebral ischemic injury and regulates the glutamate metabolism pathway in astrocytes. Trends of antiseizure medication utilization among pregnant people in four Canadian provinces from 1998 to 2023; a study from the Canadian mother-child cohort active surveillance initiative (CAMCCO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1