Pedro Ramos, João P Brás, Carolina Dias, Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves, Francisco Botelho, João Silva, Carlos Silva, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
{"title":"Uromonitor®:非肌浸润性膀胱癌患者监测尿液生物标记物的临床验证和性能评估","authors":"Pedro Ramos, João P Brás, Carolina Dias, Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves, Francisco Botelho, João Silva, Carlos Silva, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Alternative, non-invasive, cost-effective methods to complement or serve as substitutes to current standard of care (SOC) procedures in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) follow-up, are needed. Uromonitor® is a urine biomarker test detecting bladder cancer (BC) recurrence through the screening of <i>TERT</i>, <i>FGFR3</i> and <i>KRAS</i> hotspot mutations. The aim of the current study is to assess Uromonitor® performance comparing it to the current SOC methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>528 NMIBC surveillances from 439 patients were enrolled in the study. All subjects underwent SOC methods and provided a urine sample for Uromonitor® analysis before undergoing cystoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for recurrence and compared to the gold-standard cystoscopy plus trans-urethral resection (TURBT) histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uromonitor® displayed a sensitivity of 87% (74-95, 95% CI), with only 6 out of 47 recurrences failing to be detected, a specificity of 99% (98-100) PPV of 93% (82-98) and a NPV of 99% (97-99). Cystoscopy showed a total of 22 (32%) false positives not confirmed by TURBT, while Uromonitor® presented only three positive tests where no lesions were found. Overall recurrence rate was 8.9% (n=47) among 528 total screenings. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values for Uromonitor® remained high across all NMIBC grades and stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uromonitor® represents a reliable tool in the detection of NMIBC recurrence in patients undergoing routine surveillance, regardless of stage and grade. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study assessing Uromonitor®´s performance, thus validating its usefulness in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004335"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uromonitor®: Clinical Validation and Performance Assessment of a Urinary Biomarker within the Surveillance of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Ramos, João P Brás, Carolina Dias, Mafalda Bessa-Gonçalves, Francisco Botelho, João Silva, Carlos Silva, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Alternative, non-invasive, cost-effective methods to complement or serve as substitutes to current standard of care (SOC) procedures in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) follow-up, are needed. Uromonitor® is a urine biomarker test detecting bladder cancer (BC) recurrence through the screening of <i>TERT</i>, <i>FGFR3</i> and <i>KRAS</i> hotspot mutations. The aim of the current study is to assess Uromonitor® performance comparing it to the current SOC methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>528 NMIBC surveillances from 439 patients were enrolled in the study. All subjects underwent SOC methods and provided a urine sample for Uromonitor® analysis before undergoing cystoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for recurrence and compared to the gold-standard cystoscopy plus trans-urethral resection (TURBT) histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uromonitor® displayed a sensitivity of 87% (74-95, 95% CI), with only 6 out of 47 recurrences failing to be detected, a specificity of 99% (98-100) PPV of 93% (82-98) and a NPV of 99% (97-99). Cystoscopy showed a total of 22 (32%) false positives not confirmed by TURBT, while Uromonitor® presented only three positive tests where no lesions were found. Overall recurrence rate was 8.9% (n=47) among 528 total screenings. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values for Uromonitor® remained high across all NMIBC grades and stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uromonitor® represents a reliable tool in the detection of NMIBC recurrence in patients undergoing routine surveillance, regardless of stage and grade. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study assessing Uromonitor®´s performance, thus validating its usefulness in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101097JU0000000000004335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004335\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uromonitor®: Clinical Validation and Performance Assessment of a Urinary Biomarker within the Surveillance of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients.
Purpose: Alternative, non-invasive, cost-effective methods to complement or serve as substitutes to current standard of care (SOC) procedures in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) follow-up, are needed. Uromonitor® is a urine biomarker test detecting bladder cancer (BC) recurrence through the screening of TERT, FGFR3 and KRAS hotspot mutations. The aim of the current study is to assess Uromonitor® performance comparing it to the current SOC methods.
Materials and methods: 528 NMIBC surveillances from 439 patients were enrolled in the study. All subjects underwent SOC methods and provided a urine sample for Uromonitor® analysis before undergoing cystoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for recurrence and compared to the gold-standard cystoscopy plus trans-urethral resection (TURBT) histopathology.
Results: Uromonitor® displayed a sensitivity of 87% (74-95, 95% CI), with only 6 out of 47 recurrences failing to be detected, a specificity of 99% (98-100) PPV of 93% (82-98) and a NPV of 99% (97-99). Cystoscopy showed a total of 22 (32%) false positives not confirmed by TURBT, while Uromonitor® presented only three positive tests where no lesions were found. Overall recurrence rate was 8.9% (n=47) among 528 total screenings. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values for Uromonitor® remained high across all NMIBC grades and stages.
Conclusions: Uromonitor® represents a reliable tool in the detection of NMIBC recurrence in patients undergoing routine surveillance, regardless of stage and grade. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study assessing Uromonitor®´s performance, thus validating its usefulness in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.