联合检测脑脊液胶质纤维酸性蛋白和泛素 C 端水解酶 L1 与多发性硬化症和周围神经病变的相关性。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07790-4
Peter Csecsei, Peter Acs, Marianna Gottschal, Piroska Imre, Egon Miklos, Diana Simon, Szabina Erdo-Bonyar, Timea Berki, Laszlo Zavori, Reka Varnai
{"title":"联合检测脑脊液胶质纤维酸性蛋白和泛素 C 端水解酶 L1 与多发性硬化症和周围神经病变的相关性。","authors":"Peter Csecsei, Peter Acs, Marianna Gottschal, Piroska Imre, Egon Miklos, Diana Simon, Szabina Erdo-Bonyar, Timea Berki, Laszlo Zavori, Reka Varnai","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07790-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the significance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL-1) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and peripheral neuropathy (PN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 41 MS patients, 35 PN patients, and 36 controls across 5 sites. MS patient data included lesion counts, disease activity, albumin quotient, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. PN patients included those with acute and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and sensorimotor neuropathy based on nerve conduction studies. CSF concentrations of GFAP and UCHL-1 were measured using the MILLIPLEX Map Human Neuroscience Magnetic Bead Panel 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both GFAP and UCHL-1 levels were significantly higher in the two patient groups compared to controls. In the MS group, GFAP showed a strong correlation with disease duration, EDSS score, non-enhancing lesions, and the CSF/blood albumin quotient. UCHL-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with active disease (gadolinium-enhancing lesions). The combination of UCHL-1 and GFAP improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.895, 95% CI 0.780-1.000) compared to the independent measurement of either marker for indicating Gd-negative lesions. In the PN group, CSF GFAP levels were significantly lower in patients with purely demyelinating neuropathy compared to those with axonal or mixed neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GFAP serves as a sensitive marker for axonal damage in PN, while UCHL-1 closely correlates with disease activity in MS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relevance of combined testing of cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in multiple sclerosis and peripheral neuropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Csecsei, Peter Acs, Marianna Gottschal, Piroska Imre, Egon Miklos, Diana Simon, Szabina Erdo-Bonyar, Timea Berki, Laszlo Zavori, Reka Varnai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-024-07790-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the significance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL-1) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and peripheral neuropathy (PN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 41 MS patients, 35 PN patients, and 36 controls across 5 sites. MS patient data included lesion counts, disease activity, albumin quotient, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. PN patients included those with acute and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and sensorimotor neuropathy based on nerve conduction studies. CSF concentrations of GFAP and UCHL-1 were measured using the MILLIPLEX Map Human Neuroscience Magnetic Bead Panel 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both GFAP and UCHL-1 levels were significantly higher in the two patient groups compared to controls. In the MS group, GFAP showed a strong correlation with disease duration, EDSS score, non-enhancing lesions, and the CSF/blood albumin quotient. UCHL-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with active disease (gadolinium-enhancing lesions). The combination of UCHL-1 and GFAP improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.895, 95% CI 0.780-1.000) compared to the independent measurement of either marker for indicating Gd-negative lesions. In the PN group, CSF GFAP levels were significantly lower in patients with purely demyelinating neuropathy compared to those with axonal or mixed neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GFAP serves as a sensitive marker for axonal damage in PN, while UCHL-1 closely correlates with disease activity in MS patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07790-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07790-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究探讨了多发性硬化症(MS)和周围神经病变(PN)患者脑脊液(CSF)中胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素 C 端水解酶 L1(UCHL-1)的意义:我们在 5 个地点共纳入了 41 名多发性硬化症患者、35 名周围神经病患者和 36 名对照组患者。多发性硬化症患者的数据包括病灶计数、疾病活动度、白蛋白商数和扩展残疾状况量表(EDSS)评分。多发性硬化症患者包括急性和慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病患者,以及根据神经传导研究得出的感觉运动神经病患者。使用 MILLIPLEX Map Human Neuroscience Magnetic Bead Panel 1 检测 CSF 中 GFAP 和 UCHL-1 的浓度:结果:与对照组相比,两组患者的 GFAP 和 UCHL-1 水平均明显升高。在多发性硬化症组中,GFAP与病程、EDSS评分、非增强病灶和脑脊液/血白蛋白商数密切相关。活动性疾病(钆增强病变)患者的 UCHL-1 水平明显较高。在显示钆阴性病变时,UCHL-1 和 GFAP 的组合比单独测量其中一种标记物更能提高诊断准确性(AUC 0.895,95% CI 0.780-1.000)。在 PN 组中,纯脱髓鞘性神经病患者的 CSF GFAP 水平明显低于轴索型或混合型神经病患者:结论:GFAP是PN轴索损伤的敏感标记,而UCHL-1与多发性硬化症患者的疾病活动密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relevance of combined testing of cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in multiple sclerosis and peripheral neuropathy.

Introduction: This study investigates the significance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL-1) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and peripheral neuropathy (PN).

Methods: We included 41 MS patients, 35 PN patients, and 36 controls across 5 sites. MS patient data included lesion counts, disease activity, albumin quotient, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. PN patients included those with acute and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and sensorimotor neuropathy based on nerve conduction studies. CSF concentrations of GFAP and UCHL-1 were measured using the MILLIPLEX Map Human Neuroscience Magnetic Bead Panel 1.

Results: Both GFAP and UCHL-1 levels were significantly higher in the two patient groups compared to controls. In the MS group, GFAP showed a strong correlation with disease duration, EDSS score, non-enhancing lesions, and the CSF/blood albumin quotient. UCHL-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with active disease (gadolinium-enhancing lesions). The combination of UCHL-1 and GFAP improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.895, 95% CI 0.780-1.000) compared to the independent measurement of either marker for indicating Gd-negative lesions. In the PN group, CSF GFAP levels were significantly lower in patients with purely demyelinating neuropathy compared to those with axonal or mixed neuropathy.

Conclusion: GFAP serves as a sensitive marker for axonal damage in PN, while UCHL-1 closely correlates with disease activity in MS patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short‑ and long‑term outcomes: a meta‑analysis of 6 randomised control trials. Correction to: Clinical, electrophysiological, and genetic analysis of a family with two rare neuromuscular disorders: congenital myasthenic syndrome and hereditary polyneuropathy. Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short- and long-term outcomes: a meta-analysis of 6 randomised control trials. Effect of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with large core: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Efficacy of pain management strategies in adults with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1