人工智能技术与国际关系:我们需要新的分析框架吗?

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE RUSI Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/03071847.2024.2392394
Ingvild Bode
{"title":"人工智能技术与国际关系:我们需要新的分析框架吗?","authors":"Ingvild Bode","doi":"10.1080/03071847.2024.2392394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AI technologies are drawing increasing attention among international relations (IR) scholars. Ingvild Bode reviews this literature through considering, in particular, the extent to which such studies continue to use or expand on well-traded analytical frameworks. She finds that scholarship on AI in IR can look back at a longer-than-expected trajectory and centres on four key themes: the balance of power; disinformation; governance; and ethics. Much of this literature works with well-established IR conceptualisations, while studies across three emerging themes - (re)conceptualising technology, beyond the AI arms race, and unpacking relevant actors - push and expand established disciplinary frameworks. ◼.</p>","PeriodicalId":51795,"journal":{"name":"RUSI Journal","volume":"169 5","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI Technologies and International Relations: Do We Need New Analytical Frameworks?\",\"authors\":\"Ingvild Bode\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03071847.2024.2392394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AI technologies are drawing increasing attention among international relations (IR) scholars. Ingvild Bode reviews this literature through considering, in particular, the extent to which such studies continue to use or expand on well-traded analytical frameworks. She finds that scholarship on AI in IR can look back at a longer-than-expected trajectory and centres on four key themes: the balance of power; disinformation; governance; and ethics. Much of this literature works with well-established IR conceptualisations, while studies across three emerging themes - (re)conceptualising technology, beyond the AI arms race, and unpacking relevant actors - push and expand established disciplinary frameworks. ◼.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSI Journal\",\"volume\":\"169 5\",\"pages\":\"66-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575148/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSI Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2024.2392394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2024.2392394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能技术越来越受到国际关系(IR)学者的关注。英维尔德-博德(Ingvild Bode)对这些文献进行了回顾,特别是考虑了这些研究在多大程度上继续使用或扩展了成熟的分析框架。她发现,关于人工智能在国际关系中的应用的学术研究可以回顾比预期更长的轨迹,并集中在四个关键主题上:力量平衡、虚假信息、治理和伦理。这些文献中的大部分都采用了成熟的国际关系概念,而对三个新兴主题的研究--(重新)构思技术、超越人工智能军备竞赛以及解读相关行为者--则推动并扩展了既有的学科框架。◼.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI Technologies and International Relations: Do We Need New Analytical Frameworks?

AI technologies are drawing increasing attention among international relations (IR) scholars. Ingvild Bode reviews this literature through considering, in particular, the extent to which such studies continue to use or expand on well-traded analytical frameworks. She finds that scholarship on AI in IR can look back at a longer-than-expected trajectory and centres on four key themes: the balance of power; disinformation; governance; and ethics. Much of this literature works with well-established IR conceptualisations, while studies across three emerging themes - (re)conceptualising technology, beyond the AI arms race, and unpacking relevant actors - push and expand established disciplinary frameworks. ◼.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RUSI Journal
RUSI Journal POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
AI Technologies and International Relations: Do We Need New Analytical Frameworks? Good Soldiers Don’t Rape: The Stories We Tell about Military Sexual Violence Reconsidering the Relationship Between War and Strategy Overestimating Soviet Airpower Moscow’s Perspective on Nuclear Deterrence and War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1