James Lucocq, Thomas Trinder, Elli Symeonidou, Katy Homyer, Hassan Baig, Pradeep Patil, Girivasan Muthukumarasamy
{"title":"筛查发现的右侧结肠癌切除术后的长期疗效。","authors":"James Lucocq, Thomas Trinder, Elli Symeonidou, Katy Homyer, Hassan Baig, Pradeep Patil, Girivasan Muthukumarasamy","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relative outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer compared to symptomatic cases are unknown. In this study, short and long-term outcomes after right-sided colectomy in screen-detected colon cancer are compared with symptomatic cases, both emergency and elective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational cohort study of patients, including both screen-detected and symptomatic patients (elective and emergency resections), undergoing right-sided colectomy for colon cancer (2010-2020) in a tertiary care unit was conducted. Each patient was followed up for long-term recurrence and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 909 patients (median age, 70; IQR, 58-82; male, 52%) were included (151 patients (16.6%) screen-detected; 598 (65.8%) elective and 160 (17.6%) emergency). Screen-detected patients were more likely to have T1 or T2 lesions compared to elective and emergency groups (T1: 14.6% vs. 3.8% vs. 0.6% p < 0.001; T2: 16.6% vs. 8.9% vs. 3.1% p < 0.001), but were less likely to have T3 or T4 lesions (p < 0.001), respectively. Rates of N0 were higher in the screen-detected group (68.9% vs. 63.5% vs. 41.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). 98% of the screen-detected group achieved R0 resection compared to 93.3% of elective and 79.4% of emergency patients (p < 0.001). At 5-years following resection, overall survival for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups were 85.4%, 75.4%, and 53.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Recurrence at 5-year post-resection were 8%, 15.1%, and 22.5% for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups, respectively (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>When considering right-sided colon cancer alone, screen-detected cancers have a lower long-term recurrence rate, lower rates of postoperative complication, and superior survival compared to symptomatic groups following resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer.\",\"authors\":\"James Lucocq, Thomas Trinder, Elli Symeonidou, Katy Homyer, Hassan Baig, Pradeep Patil, Girivasan Muthukumarasamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.12409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relative outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer compared to symptomatic cases are unknown. In this study, short and long-term outcomes after right-sided colectomy in screen-detected colon cancer are compared with symptomatic cases, both emergency and elective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational cohort study of patients, including both screen-detected and symptomatic patients (elective and emergency resections), undergoing right-sided colectomy for colon cancer (2010-2020) in a tertiary care unit was conducted. Each patient was followed up for long-term recurrence and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 909 patients (median age, 70; IQR, 58-82; male, 52%) were included (151 patients (16.6%) screen-detected; 598 (65.8%) elective and 160 (17.6%) emergency). Screen-detected patients were more likely to have T1 or T2 lesions compared to elective and emergency groups (T1: 14.6% vs. 3.8% vs. 0.6% p < 0.001; T2: 16.6% vs. 8.9% vs. 3.1% p < 0.001), but were less likely to have T3 or T4 lesions (p < 0.001), respectively. Rates of N0 were higher in the screen-detected group (68.9% vs. 63.5% vs. 41.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). 98% of the screen-detected group achieved R0 resection compared to 93.3% of elective and 79.4% of emergency patients (p < 0.001). At 5-years following resection, overall survival for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups were 85.4%, 75.4%, and 53.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Recurrence at 5-year post-resection were 8%, 15.1%, and 22.5% for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups, respectively (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>When considering right-sided colon cancer alone, screen-detected cancers have a lower long-term recurrence rate, lower rates of postoperative complication, and superior survival compared to symptomatic groups following resection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12409\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer.
Background: The relative outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer compared to symptomatic cases are unknown. In this study, short and long-term outcomes after right-sided colectomy in screen-detected colon cancer are compared with symptomatic cases, both emergency and elective.
Methods: A prospective observational cohort study of patients, including both screen-detected and symptomatic patients (elective and emergency resections), undergoing right-sided colectomy for colon cancer (2010-2020) in a tertiary care unit was conducted. Each patient was followed up for long-term recurrence and survival.
Results: A total of 909 patients (median age, 70; IQR, 58-82; male, 52%) were included (151 patients (16.6%) screen-detected; 598 (65.8%) elective and 160 (17.6%) emergency). Screen-detected patients were more likely to have T1 or T2 lesions compared to elective and emergency groups (T1: 14.6% vs. 3.8% vs. 0.6% p < 0.001; T2: 16.6% vs. 8.9% vs. 3.1% p < 0.001), but were less likely to have T3 or T4 lesions (p < 0.001), respectively. Rates of N0 were higher in the screen-detected group (68.9% vs. 63.5% vs. 41.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). 98% of the screen-detected group achieved R0 resection compared to 93.3% of elective and 79.4% of emergency patients (p < 0.001). At 5-years following resection, overall survival for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups were 85.4%, 75.4%, and 53.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Recurrence at 5-year post-resection were 8%, 15.1%, and 22.5% for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups, respectively (p < 0.001).
Discussion: When considering right-sided colon cancer alone, screen-detected cancers have a lower long-term recurrence rate, lower rates of postoperative complication, and superior survival compared to symptomatic groups following resection.
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.