Christopher D Gaffney, Nahid Punjani, Aaron Brant, Jonathan Fainberg, Sandeep Sai Voleti, Xinyan Zheng, Art Sedrakyan, Kelly A Garrett, James A Kashanian
{"title":"勃起功能障碍是低位前路切除术和腹会阴切除术治疗结直肠癌的一个被低估的后果。","authors":"Christopher D Gaffney, Nahid Punjani, Aaron Brant, Jonathan Fainberg, Sandeep Sai Voleti, Xinyan Zheng, Art Sedrakyan, Kelly A Garrett, James A Kashanian","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-02005-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the frequency and predictive factors of erectile dysfunction diagnosis after colorectal cancer surgery. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify a national sample of men undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer from 2004 to 2015. Men aged > 65 years with any index surgery within 1 year of diagnosis of colorectal cancer were included. Men with a history of prior erectile dysfunction, metastatic cancer, or genitourinary cancer prior to their index procedure were excluded. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of erectile dysfunction within 2 years of the index procedure. A total of 28,248 men aged > 65 years who underwent colorectal cancer surgery were identified. The rates of erectile dysfunction diagnosis 2 years after surgery were 3.6% for hemicolectomy, 5.3% for low anterior resection, and 6.4% for abdominoperineal resection. On multivariable analysis, low anterior resection (HR: 1.27, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.51, p < 0.01) and abdominoperineal resection (HR: 1.49, 95%CI 1.14 - 1.93, p < 0.01) were independently associated with increased risk of erectile dysfunction compared to hemicolectomy. Minimally invasive surgery was independently associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction compared to open surgery (HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.25-1.65, p < 0.001). Compared to hemicolectomy, men treated with low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection have a higher risk of being diagnosed with erectile dysfunction within 2 years of treatment. The absolute rate of erectile dysfunction diagnosis was low compared to rates reported in prior controlled trials, suggesting that patients are underdiagnosed in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erectile dysfunction is an underdiagnosed consequence of low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher D Gaffney, Nahid Punjani, Aaron Brant, Jonathan Fainberg, Sandeep Sai Voleti, Xinyan Zheng, Art Sedrakyan, Kelly A Garrett, James A Kashanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-024-02005-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To explore the frequency and predictive factors of erectile dysfunction diagnosis after colorectal cancer surgery. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify a national sample of men undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer from 2004 to 2015. Men aged > 65 years with any index surgery within 1 year of diagnosis of colorectal cancer were included. Men with a history of prior erectile dysfunction, metastatic cancer, or genitourinary cancer prior to their index procedure were excluded. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of erectile dysfunction within 2 years of the index procedure. A total of 28,248 men aged > 65 years who underwent colorectal cancer surgery were identified. The rates of erectile dysfunction diagnosis 2 years after surgery were 3.6% for hemicolectomy, 5.3% for low anterior resection, and 6.4% for abdominoperineal resection. On multivariable analysis, low anterior resection (HR: 1.27, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.51, p < 0.01) and abdominoperineal resection (HR: 1.49, 95%CI 1.14 - 1.93, p < 0.01) were independently associated with increased risk of erectile dysfunction compared to hemicolectomy. Minimally invasive surgery was independently associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction compared to open surgery (HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.25-1.65, p < 0.001). Compared to hemicolectomy, men treated with low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection have a higher risk of being diagnosed with erectile dysfunction within 2 years of treatment. The absolute rate of erectile dysfunction diagnosis was low compared to rates reported in prior controlled trials, suggesting that patients are underdiagnosed in real-world settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02005-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02005-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Erectile dysfunction is an underdiagnosed consequence of low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for colorectal cancer.
To explore the frequency and predictive factors of erectile dysfunction diagnosis after colorectal cancer surgery. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify a national sample of men undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer from 2004 to 2015. Men aged > 65 years with any index surgery within 1 year of diagnosis of colorectal cancer were included. Men with a history of prior erectile dysfunction, metastatic cancer, or genitourinary cancer prior to their index procedure were excluded. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of erectile dysfunction within 2 years of the index procedure. A total of 28,248 men aged > 65 years who underwent colorectal cancer surgery were identified. The rates of erectile dysfunction diagnosis 2 years after surgery were 3.6% for hemicolectomy, 5.3% for low anterior resection, and 6.4% for abdominoperineal resection. On multivariable analysis, low anterior resection (HR: 1.27, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.51, p < 0.01) and abdominoperineal resection (HR: 1.49, 95%CI 1.14 - 1.93, p < 0.01) were independently associated with increased risk of erectile dysfunction compared to hemicolectomy. Minimally invasive surgery was independently associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction compared to open surgery (HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.25-1.65, p < 0.001). Compared to hemicolectomy, men treated with low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection have a higher risk of being diagnosed with erectile dysfunction within 2 years of treatment. The absolute rate of erectile dysfunction diagnosis was low compared to rates reported in prior controlled trials, suggesting that patients are underdiagnosed in real-world settings.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.