关于性别肯定护理对被监禁的黑人变性妇女的关键影响的医学共识。

Journal of law and health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
John Parsi
{"title":"关于性别肯定护理对被监禁的黑人变性妇女的关键影响的医学共识。","authors":"John Parsi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In <i>Kosilek v. Spencer</i> the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit adopted The World Professional Association of Transgender Health Standards of Care (WPATH SOC) as medical consensus on gender affirming care and held that Michelle Kosilek could access gender affirming care but that she did not meet the criteria for gender affirming surgery. In <i>Gibson v. Collier</i> the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit with a sparse record and no expert testimony denied Vanessa Lynn Gibson access to gender affirming surgery and incorrectly claimed that Kosilek did not support the WPATH SOC as representing the medical consensus on gender affirming care. Finally, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held in <i>Edmo v. Corizon</i> that denying access to gender affirming surgery to an incarcerated transgender person suffering from severe gender dysphoria resulting in two attempts at self-castration, cutting to reduce genital distress, and suicidal ideation violated the Eighth Amendment. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit joined medical and scientific organizations who widely adopt The World Professional Association of Transgender Health Standards of Care (WPATH SOC) as medical consensus on gender affirming care. Nonetheless, 10 Ninth Circuit Judges dissented to the denial of rehearing <i>en banc in Edmo</i>. Although the Supreme Court denied certiorari (with Justice Thomas and Alito dissenting), the Supreme Court also denied certiorari in the Fifth Circuit case <i>Gibson v. Collier</i> which denied access to gender affirming surgery and rejected the WPATH SOC without offering any alternatives. Transgender women are disproportionately incarcerated in the United States. Black transgender women are disproportionately represented even among incarcerated transgender women. The combination of transphobia and racism result in worse medical outcomes following a failure to provide adequate medical care. This article argues that rejecting the WPATH SOC disproportionately impacts Black transgender women. Failure to recognize the WPATH SOC as medical consensus will perpetuate medical and carceral racism and transphobia.</p>","PeriodicalId":73804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of law and health","volume":"38 1","pages":"66-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Consensus on Gender Affirming Care's Critical Impact on Incarcerated Black Transgender Women.\",\"authors\":\"John Parsi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In <i>Kosilek v. Spencer</i> the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit adopted The World Professional Association of Transgender Health Standards of Care (WPATH SOC) as medical consensus on gender affirming care and held that Michelle Kosilek could access gender affirming care but that she did not meet the criteria for gender affirming surgery. In <i>Gibson v. Collier</i> the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit with a sparse record and no expert testimony denied Vanessa Lynn Gibson access to gender affirming surgery and incorrectly claimed that Kosilek did not support the WPATH SOC as representing the medical consensus on gender affirming care. Finally, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held in <i>Edmo v. Corizon</i> that denying access to gender affirming surgery to an incarcerated transgender person suffering from severe gender dysphoria resulting in two attempts at self-castration, cutting to reduce genital distress, and suicidal ideation violated the Eighth Amendment. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit joined medical and scientific organizations who widely adopt The World Professional Association of Transgender Health Standards of Care (WPATH SOC) as medical consensus on gender affirming care. Nonetheless, 10 Ninth Circuit Judges dissented to the denial of rehearing <i>en banc in Edmo</i>. Although the Supreme Court denied certiorari (with Justice Thomas and Alito dissenting), the Supreme Court also denied certiorari in the Fifth Circuit case <i>Gibson v. Collier</i> which denied access to gender affirming surgery and rejected the WPATH SOC without offering any alternatives. Transgender women are disproportionately incarcerated in the United States. Black transgender women are disproportionately represented even among incarcerated transgender women. The combination of transphobia and racism result in worse medical outcomes following a failure to provide adequate medical care. This article argues that rejecting the WPATH SOC disproportionately impacts Black transgender women. Failure to recognize the WPATH SOC as medical consensus will perpetuate medical and carceral racism and transphobia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of law and health\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"66-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of law and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of law and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 Kosilek 诉 Spencer 案中,美国第一巡回上诉法院采纳了世界变性人健康护理标准专业协会(WPATH SOC)作为关于性别平权护理的医学共识,并认为 Michelle Kosilek 可以获得性别平权护理,但她不符合性别平权手术的标准。在 Gibson 诉 Collier 案中,美国第五巡回上诉法院在记录稀少且没有专家证词的情况下,拒绝 Vanessa Lynn Gibson 接受性别平权手术,并错误地声称 Kosilek 不支持 WPATH SOC,认为其代表了性别平权护理的医学共识。最后,美国第九巡回上诉法院在 Edmo 诉 Corizon 案中裁定,拒绝为一名因严重性别焦虑症而导致两次试图自我阉割、切割生殖器以减轻痛苦并产生自杀念头的被监禁变性人实施性别确认手术违反了第八修正案。因此,第九巡回法院加入了医疗和科学组织的行列,这些组织广泛采用《世界变性人健康护理标准专业协会》(WPATH SOC)作为有关性别平权护理的医疗共识。尽管如此,仍有 10 名第九巡回法院法官对拒绝在 Edmo 案中进行全体重审表示异议。虽然最高法院拒绝了对该案的调卷(托马斯法官和阿利托法官持反对意见),但最高法院也拒绝了对第五巡回法院吉布森诉科利尔一案的调卷,该案拒绝了性别平权手术,并拒绝了《世界变性者健康标准》,但没有提供任何替代方案。在美国,变性妇女被监禁的比例过高。即使在被监禁的变性妇女中,黑人变性妇女的比例也过高。变性仇视和种族主义的结合导致了在无法提供适当医疗护理后医疗结果的恶化。本文认为,拒绝接受 WPATH SOC 会对黑人变性女性造成不成比例的影响。如果不承认 WPATH SOC 是医学共识,医疗和监狱中的种族主义和变性恐惧症就会长期存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Consensus on Gender Affirming Care's Critical Impact on Incarcerated Black Transgender Women.

In Kosilek v. Spencer the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit adopted The World Professional Association of Transgender Health Standards of Care (WPATH SOC) as medical consensus on gender affirming care and held that Michelle Kosilek could access gender affirming care but that she did not meet the criteria for gender affirming surgery. In Gibson v. Collier the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit with a sparse record and no expert testimony denied Vanessa Lynn Gibson access to gender affirming surgery and incorrectly claimed that Kosilek did not support the WPATH SOC as representing the medical consensus on gender affirming care. Finally, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held in Edmo v. Corizon that denying access to gender affirming surgery to an incarcerated transgender person suffering from severe gender dysphoria resulting in two attempts at self-castration, cutting to reduce genital distress, and suicidal ideation violated the Eighth Amendment. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit joined medical and scientific organizations who widely adopt The World Professional Association of Transgender Health Standards of Care (WPATH SOC) as medical consensus on gender affirming care. Nonetheless, 10 Ninth Circuit Judges dissented to the denial of rehearing en banc in Edmo. Although the Supreme Court denied certiorari (with Justice Thomas and Alito dissenting), the Supreme Court also denied certiorari in the Fifth Circuit case Gibson v. Collier which denied access to gender affirming surgery and rejected the WPATH SOC without offering any alternatives. Transgender women are disproportionately incarcerated in the United States. Black transgender women are disproportionately represented even among incarcerated transgender women. The combination of transphobia and racism result in worse medical outcomes following a failure to provide adequate medical care. This article argues that rejecting the WPATH SOC disproportionately impacts Black transgender women. Failure to recognize the WPATH SOC as medical consensus will perpetuate medical and carceral racism and transphobia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ninth Amendment: An Underutilized Protection for Reproductive Choice. Distorted Burden Shifting and Barred Mitigation: Being a Stubborn 234 Years Old Ironically Hasn't Helped the Supreme Court Mature. How Bodily Autonomy Can Fail Against Vaccination Mandates: The Few vs. the Many. When Governors Prioritize Individual Freedom over Public Health: Tort Liability for Government Failures. Without Due Process of Law: The Dobbs Decision and Its Cataclysmic Impact on the Substantive Due Process and Privacy Rights of Ohio Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1