医院怀孕员工的工作场所干预--病假评估群组随机试验。

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101038
Jane Lauridsen , Pernille Pedersen , Anne-Mette Hedeager Momsen , Mette Lausten Hansen , Ane Marie Thulstrup , Rikke Damkjær Maimburg
{"title":"医院怀孕员工的工作场所干预--病假评估群组随机试验。","authors":"Jane Lauridsen ,&nbsp;Pernille Pedersen ,&nbsp;Anne-Mette Hedeager Momsen ,&nbsp;Mette Lausten Hansen ,&nbsp;Ane Marie Thulstrup ,&nbsp;Rikke Damkjær Maimburg","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Sick leave during pregnancy is common and associated with strenuous working conditions and multiple occupational exposures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of midwifery facilitation of sessions with pregnant employees and managers focusing on work adjustment, to reduce discomfort and occupational risks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted. Hospital employees were randomised to intervention or reference. The intervention group received midwifery support in addition to the standard hospital pregnancy policy provided to the reference group. Outcomes were pregnancy-related sick leave and general sick leave. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed with mixed-effect models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sick leave was similar between the intervention and reference groups, and 51 % of pregnant employees did not take any days of full pregnancy related sick leave, while approximately 21 % took more than 30 days. Group differences in mean estimates for partial sick leave were −0.5 (CI −2.3;1.3) days. Differences in full sick leave was 1.2 (CI −2.9;5.2) days, and 0.6 (CI −1.0;2.1) days for general sick leave.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Midwifery support as an add-on to usual pregnancy policy did not decrease sick leave during pregnancy compared to usual practice in a study population of Danish healthcare professionals. Midwifery support tailored towards the specific work environment may perhaps provide better results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 101038"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace intervention among pregnant hospital employees − a cluster randomised trial evaluating sick leave\",\"authors\":\"Jane Lauridsen ,&nbsp;Pernille Pedersen ,&nbsp;Anne-Mette Hedeager Momsen ,&nbsp;Mette Lausten Hansen ,&nbsp;Ane Marie Thulstrup ,&nbsp;Rikke Damkjær Maimburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Sick leave during pregnancy is common and associated with strenuous working conditions and multiple occupational exposures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of midwifery facilitation of sessions with pregnant employees and managers focusing on work adjustment, to reduce discomfort and occupational risks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted. Hospital employees were randomised to intervention or reference. The intervention group received midwifery support in addition to the standard hospital pregnancy policy provided to the reference group. Outcomes were pregnancy-related sick leave and general sick leave. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed with mixed-effect models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sick leave was similar between the intervention and reference groups, and 51 % of pregnant employees did not take any days of full pregnancy related sick leave, while approximately 21 % took more than 30 days. Group differences in mean estimates for partial sick leave were −0.5 (CI −2.3;1.3) days. Differences in full sick leave was 1.2 (CI −2.9;5.2) days, and 0.6 (CI −1.0;2.1) days for general sick leave.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Midwifery support as an add-on to usual pregnancy policy did not decrease sick leave during pregnancy compared to usual practice in a study population of Danish healthcare professionals. Midwifery support tailored towards the specific work environment may perhaps provide better results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000934\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:怀孕期间请病假很常见,而且与艰苦的工作条件和多种职业风险有关。本研究旨在评估助产士协助怀孕员工和管理人员进行以工作适应为重点的培训,以减少不适和职业风险的效果:方法:进行分组随机对照试验。医院员工被随机分为干预组和参照组。干预组除了接受参照组所享受的标准医院怀孕政策外,还接受助产士支持。试验结果为与妊娠相关的病假和一般病假。采用混合效应模型进行了意向治疗分析:干预组和参照组的病假情况相似,51% 的怀孕员工没有休过任何天数的妊娠相关病假,约 21% 的员工休了 30 天以上的病假。部分病假的平均估计天数的组间差异为-0.5 (CI -2.3;1.3)天。全病假的差异为 1.2 (CI -2.9;5.2)天,一般病假的差异为 0.6 (CI -1.0;2.1) 天:在一项针对丹麦医护人员的研究中,与常规做法相比,助产支持作为常规孕期政策的附加措施并没有减少孕期病假。针对特定工作环境的助产支持或许能取得更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Workplace intervention among pregnant hospital employees − a cluster randomised trial evaluating sick leave

Objective

Sick leave during pregnancy is common and associated with strenuous working conditions and multiple occupational exposures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of midwifery facilitation of sessions with pregnant employees and managers focusing on work adjustment, to reduce discomfort and occupational risks.

Methods

A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted. Hospital employees were randomised to intervention or reference. The intervention group received midwifery support in addition to the standard hospital pregnancy policy provided to the reference group. Outcomes were pregnancy-related sick leave and general sick leave. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed with mixed-effect models.

Results

Sick leave was similar between the intervention and reference groups, and 51 % of pregnant employees did not take any days of full pregnancy related sick leave, while approximately 21 % took more than 30 days. Group differences in mean estimates for partial sick leave were −0.5 (CI −2.3;1.3) days. Differences in full sick leave was 1.2 (CI −2.9;5.2) days, and 0.6 (CI −1.0;2.1) days for general sick leave.

Conclusion

Midwifery support as an add-on to usual pregnancy policy did not decrease sick leave during pregnancy compared to usual practice in a study population of Danish healthcare professionals. Midwifery support tailored towards the specific work environment may perhaps provide better results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
I had to tell to survive“- a cross-sectional study on exposure to intimate partner violence in pregnant women and the importance of screening Assessing awareness of danger signs of pregnancy and its associated factors among pregnant women in Libya: A cross-sectional study Storytelling in midwifery: ‘Not just for entertainment’ A qualitative exploration of the client-provider relationship and its role in discussing sexual health and HIV among African American women in the US South Medical student perceptions of clinical abortion training opportunities across the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1