缩短时间对 18F - 氟贝特宾 PET 诊断的影响。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING EJNMMI Research Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1186/s13550-024-01181-8
Phuong T H Trinh, Doo-Young Kim, Kang-Ho Choi, Jahae Kim
{"title":"缩短时间对 18F - 氟贝特宾 PET 诊断的影响。","authors":"Phuong T H Trinh, Doo-Young Kim, Kang-Ho Choi, Jahae Kim","doi":"10.1186/s13550-024-01181-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-Florbetaben amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan is crucial for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, typically involving a 20 min acquisition. However, maintaining such prolonged scans can be challenging in some cases. This study explores the diagnostic impact and feasibility of reducing scan durations by comparing quantitative measures between shortened and standard scans. Additionally, we identified the optimal Centiloid threshold to distinguish between positive and negative amyloid results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 307 PET scans from our memory clinic, each followed up for a minimum of two years. The scans, conducted 90 to 110 min after approximately 300 MBq of <sup>18</sup>F-Florbetaben injection, were categorized into four sets of 5 min durations: 5, 10, 15, and 20 min. Nuclear medicine physicians validated and rated each scan as either amyloid-positive or negative. For quantitative assessments, we employed the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) and Centiloid scales, comparing total SUVR and Centiloid values across five subregions (global, frontal, posterior cingulate-precuneus, lateral temporal, and parietal) using Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to develop optimal Centiloid thresholds. Comparing the images at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min images, SUVR and Centiloid values gradually increased with prolonged scan times. The mean SUVR difference between 5 and 20 min was 0.03 for the amyloid-positive and 0.01 for the amyloid-negative groups; Centiloid differences were 4.60 and 2.38, respectively. Additionally, no significant variation was observed in total SUVR and Centiloid values among the durations across all subregions in positive and negative groups (all p > 0.1). ROC analysis indicated that a Centiloid threshold of 21.86 at 5 min provided optimal agreement with visual assessments (AUC = 0.985, sensitivity = 0.950, specificity = 0.972), especially using the global area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that 5 min image scans with an optimal threshold of CL = 21.86 exhibited minimal bias in SUVR and Centiloid values compared to longer scans (10, 15, and 20 min). Our findings suggest that shorter scan times are a viable and effective option for brain amyloid PET imaging in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11611,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of shortening time on diagnosis of <sup>18</sup>F-florbetaben PET.\",\"authors\":\"Phuong T H Trinh, Doo-Young Kim, Kang-Ho Choi, Jahae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13550-024-01181-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-Florbetaben amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan is crucial for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, typically involving a 20 min acquisition. However, maintaining such prolonged scans can be challenging in some cases. This study explores the diagnostic impact and feasibility of reducing scan durations by comparing quantitative measures between shortened and standard scans. Additionally, we identified the optimal Centiloid threshold to distinguish between positive and negative amyloid results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 307 PET scans from our memory clinic, each followed up for a minimum of two years. The scans, conducted 90 to 110 min after approximately 300 MBq of <sup>18</sup>F-Florbetaben injection, were categorized into four sets of 5 min durations: 5, 10, 15, and 20 min. Nuclear medicine physicians validated and rated each scan as either amyloid-positive or negative. For quantitative assessments, we employed the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) and Centiloid scales, comparing total SUVR and Centiloid values across five subregions (global, frontal, posterior cingulate-precuneus, lateral temporal, and parietal) using Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to develop optimal Centiloid thresholds. Comparing the images at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min images, SUVR and Centiloid values gradually increased with prolonged scan times. The mean SUVR difference between 5 and 20 min was 0.03 for the amyloid-positive and 0.01 for the amyloid-negative groups; Centiloid differences were 4.60 and 2.38, respectively. Additionally, no significant variation was observed in total SUVR and Centiloid values among the durations across all subregions in positive and negative groups (all p > 0.1). ROC analysis indicated that a Centiloid threshold of 21.86 at 5 min provided optimal agreement with visual assessments (AUC = 0.985, sensitivity = 0.950, specificity = 0.972), especially using the global area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that 5 min image scans with an optimal threshold of CL = 21.86 exhibited minimal bias in SUVR and Centiloid values compared to longer scans (10, 15, and 20 min). Our findings suggest that shorter scan times are a viable and effective option for brain amyloid PET imaging in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582261/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01181-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01181-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:18F-氟贝特宾淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描(PET)是诊断阿尔茨海默病的关键,通常需要 20 分钟的采集时间。然而,在某些情况下,维持如此长时间的扫描具有挑战性。本研究通过比较缩短扫描时间和标准扫描时间的定量指标,探讨了缩短扫描时间对诊断的影响和可行性。此外,我们还确定了区分淀粉样蛋白阳性和阴性结果的最佳Centiloid阈值:我们分析了来自记忆诊所的 307 次 PET 扫描,每次扫描至少随访两年。扫描在注射约 300 MBq 18F-Florbetaben 后 90 至 110 分钟进行,扫描持续时间分为四组,每组 5 分钟:5、10、15 和 20 分钟。核医学医生对每次扫描进行验证,并将其评定为淀粉样蛋白阳性或阴性。在定量评估方面,我们采用了标准化摄取值比(SUVR)和Centiloid量表,并使用Bland-Altman分析法比较了五个亚区域(总体、额叶、后扣带回-楔形、颞外侧和顶叶)的总SUVR和Centiloid值。利用接收操作者特征曲线(ROC)来制定最佳的Centiloid阈值。比较 5、10、15 和 20 分钟的图像,SUVR 和 Centiloid 值随着扫描时间的延长而逐渐增加。淀粉样蛋白阳性组和淀粉样蛋白阴性组 5 至 20 分钟的平均 SUVR 差值分别为 0.03 和 0.01;Centiloid 差值分别为 4.60 和 2.38。此外,在阳性组和阴性组的所有亚区域中,总 SUVR 和 Centiloid 值在不同持续时间内无明显差异(均 p > 0.1)。ROC分析表明,5分钟时21.86的Centiloid阈值与目测评估具有最佳一致性(AUC = 0.985,灵敏度 = 0.950,特异性 = 0.972),尤其是使用全球区域:本研究表明,与较长的扫描时间(10、15 和 20 分钟)相比,5 分钟图像扫描的最佳阈值为 CL = 21.86,其 SUVR 和 Centiloid 值的偏差最小。我们的研究结果表明,在临床环境中,较短的扫描时间是脑淀粉样蛋白 PET 成像可行且有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of shortening time on diagnosis of 18F-florbetaben PET.

Background: 18F-Florbetaben amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan is crucial for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease, typically involving a 20 min acquisition. However, maintaining such prolonged scans can be challenging in some cases. This study explores the diagnostic impact and feasibility of reducing scan durations by comparing quantitative measures between shortened and standard scans. Additionally, we identified the optimal Centiloid threshold to distinguish between positive and negative amyloid results.

Results: We analyzed 307 PET scans from our memory clinic, each followed up for a minimum of two years. The scans, conducted 90 to 110 min after approximately 300 MBq of 18F-Florbetaben injection, were categorized into four sets of 5 min durations: 5, 10, 15, and 20 min. Nuclear medicine physicians validated and rated each scan as either amyloid-positive or negative. For quantitative assessments, we employed the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) and Centiloid scales, comparing total SUVR and Centiloid values across five subregions (global, frontal, posterior cingulate-precuneus, lateral temporal, and parietal) using Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to develop optimal Centiloid thresholds. Comparing the images at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min images, SUVR and Centiloid values gradually increased with prolonged scan times. The mean SUVR difference between 5 and 20 min was 0.03 for the amyloid-positive and 0.01 for the amyloid-negative groups; Centiloid differences were 4.60 and 2.38, respectively. Additionally, no significant variation was observed in total SUVR and Centiloid values among the durations across all subregions in positive and negative groups (all p > 0.1). ROC analysis indicated that a Centiloid threshold of 21.86 at 5 min provided optimal agreement with visual assessments (AUC = 0.985, sensitivity = 0.950, specificity = 0.972), especially using the global area.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that 5 min image scans with an optimal threshold of CL = 21.86 exhibited minimal bias in SUVR and Centiloid values compared to longer scans (10, 15, and 20 min). Our findings suggest that shorter scan times are a viable and effective option for brain amyloid PET imaging in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Research publishes new basic, translational and clinical research in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Regular features include original research articles, rapid communication of preliminary data on innovative research, interesting case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. Educational articles on basic sciences, fundamental aspects and controversy related to pre-clinical and clinical research or ethical aspects of research are also welcome. Timely reviews provide updates on current applications, issues in imaging research and translational aspects of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging technologies. The main emphasis is placed on the development of targeted imaging with radiopharmaceuticals within the broader context of molecular probes to enhance understanding and characterisation of the complex biological processes underlying disease and to develop, test and guide new treatment modalities, including radionuclide therapy.
期刊最新文献
In vitro and ex vivo evaluation of preclinical models for FAP-targeted theranostics: differences and relevance for radiotracer evaluation. cfDNA fragmentation patterns correlate with tumor burden measured via PSMA PET/CT volumetric parameters in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. P2X 7-receptor binding in new-onset and secondary progressive MS - a [11C]SMW139 PET study. PET imaging of GABAA receptors in pancreatic islets by [11C]flumazenil. Imaging tumor and ascites-associated macrophages in a mouse model of metastatic ovarian cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1