COVID-19 大流行是否影响了牙科医生的抗生素处方模式?

Q3 Dentistry Evidence-based dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1038/s41432-024-01087-3
Akshani Patel, Satish Kumar
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行是否影响了牙科医生的抗生素处方模式?","authors":"Akshani Patel, Satish Kumar","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01087-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient records from Wits Oral Health Centre were collected over two years (March 2019–March 2021). The records were divided into two groups: pre-COVID-19 (March 2019–March 2020) and COVID-19 (March 2020–March 2021). The total sample size was 698 systematically selected patient records who received antibiotics. A systematic random sampling method was used to select a sample of patients who received prescriptions for antibiotics. Patients were included based on their treatment time and need for antibiotic prescription. Patients whose records were missing information or treated by independent private practitioners for whom records access was not feasible were excluded. The extracted data contained information regarding the patients’ demographics, medical histories, dental condition, dental procedure, antibiotic type, frequency, dosage, duration of use, and prescribers’ disciplines. The information was categorized and captured in Microsoft Excel to analyze and create figures and tables. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared, and z-tests to compare pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 prescription patterns in RStudio. From an initial pool of 44,067 patient consultations, a systematic random sample of 698 records met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study. The sample was divided between pre-COVID-19 (n = 350) and COVID-19 (n = 348). A significant increase in antibiotic prescriptions was found during COVID-19 (1571 prescriptions) compared to pre-COVID-19 (1109 prescriptions). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin and metronidazole. Specifically, amoxicillin was used in most cases before and during COVID-19. The combination of amoxicillin with metronidazole increased from 16.6% pre-COVID-19 to 24.4% COVID-19. It was found that many of the antibiotics prescribed from both periods were not clinically indicated (53.1% pre-COVID-19 and 54.3% COVID-19). The authors concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased antibiotic prescriptions despite fewer in-person consultations. This was likely due to insufficient surgical intervention and reliance on antibiotics to treat dental conditions. The lack of proper antibiotic use raises concerns regarding dental practitioners’ appropriate use of antibiotics. There is an urgent need for improved antibiotic stewardship to prevent the misuse and growing public health issue of antimicrobial resistance.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"25 4","pages":"208-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01087-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact antibiotic prescribing patterns among dentists?\",\"authors\":\"Akshani Patel, Satish Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41432-024-01087-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patient records from Wits Oral Health Centre were collected over two years (March 2019–March 2021). The records were divided into two groups: pre-COVID-19 (March 2019–March 2020) and COVID-19 (March 2020–March 2021). The total sample size was 698 systematically selected patient records who received antibiotics. A systematic random sampling method was used to select a sample of patients who received prescriptions for antibiotics. Patients were included based on their treatment time and need for antibiotic prescription. Patients whose records were missing information or treated by independent private practitioners for whom records access was not feasible were excluded. The extracted data contained information regarding the patients’ demographics, medical histories, dental condition, dental procedure, antibiotic type, frequency, dosage, duration of use, and prescribers’ disciplines. The information was categorized and captured in Microsoft Excel to analyze and create figures and tables. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared, and z-tests to compare pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 prescription patterns in RStudio. From an initial pool of 44,067 patient consultations, a systematic random sample of 698 records met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study. The sample was divided between pre-COVID-19 (n = 350) and COVID-19 (n = 348). A significant increase in antibiotic prescriptions was found during COVID-19 (1571 prescriptions) compared to pre-COVID-19 (1109 prescriptions). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin and metronidazole. Specifically, amoxicillin was used in most cases before and during COVID-19. The combination of amoxicillin with metronidazole increased from 16.6% pre-COVID-19 to 24.4% COVID-19. It was found that many of the antibiotics prescribed from both periods were not clinically indicated (53.1% pre-COVID-19 and 54.3% COVID-19). The authors concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased antibiotic prescriptions despite fewer in-person consultations. This was likely due to insufficient surgical intervention and reliance on antibiotics to treat dental conditions. The lack of proper antibiotic use raises concerns regarding dental practitioners’ appropriate use of antibiotics. There is an urgent need for improved antibiotic stewardship to prevent the misuse and growing public health issue of antimicrobial resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"208-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01087-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01087-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01087-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据来源:收集了 Wits 口腔健康中心两年内(2019 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月)的患者记录。记录分为两组:COVID-19 前(2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月)和 COVID-19(2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月)。总样本量为 698 份系统选取的接受过抗生素治疗的患者病历:研究选取:采用系统随机抽样法选取开具抗生素处方的患者样本。根据患者的治疗时间和对抗生素处方的需求将其纳入样本。记录信息缺失的患者或由独立私人医生治疗而无法获取记录的患者被排除在外:提取的数据包括患者的人口统计学、病史、牙科状况、牙科手术、抗生素类型、频率、剂量、使用时间以及处方者的学科等信息。这些信息被归类并录入 Microsoft Excel 进行分析和制作图表。在 RStudio 中使用描述性统计、卡方和 z 检验进行分析,以比较 COVID-19 前和 COVID-19 后的处方模式:在最初的 44,067 份患者咨询中,有 698 份系统随机样本符合纳入本研究的资格标准。样本分为 COVID-19 前(n = 350)和 COVID-19 后(n = 348)。与 COVID-19 前(1109 份处方)相比,COVID-19 期间的抗生素处方量(1571 份处方)明显增加。最常处方的抗生素是阿莫西林和甲硝唑。具体而言,在 COVID-19 之前和期间,阿莫西林被用于大多数病例。阿莫西林与甲硝唑联用的比例从 COVID-19 前的 16.6% 增加到 COVID-19 期间的 24.4%。研究发现,在这两个时期开出的抗生素处方中,很多都没有临床指征(COVID-19 之前为 53.1%,COVID-19 期间为 54.3%):作者得出结论:COVID-19 大流行期间,尽管亲诊人数减少,但抗生素处方却显著增加。这可能是由于手术干预不足以及依赖抗生素治疗牙科疾病所致。缺乏适当的抗生素使用引起了人们对牙科医生适当使用抗生素的担忧。目前迫切需要改进抗生素管理,以防止抗生素的滥用和日益严重的抗菌药耐药性这一公共卫生问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact antibiotic prescribing patterns among dentists?
Patient records from Wits Oral Health Centre were collected over two years (March 2019–March 2021). The records were divided into two groups: pre-COVID-19 (March 2019–March 2020) and COVID-19 (March 2020–March 2021). The total sample size was 698 systematically selected patient records who received antibiotics. A systematic random sampling method was used to select a sample of patients who received prescriptions for antibiotics. Patients were included based on their treatment time and need for antibiotic prescription. Patients whose records were missing information or treated by independent private practitioners for whom records access was not feasible were excluded. The extracted data contained information regarding the patients’ demographics, medical histories, dental condition, dental procedure, antibiotic type, frequency, dosage, duration of use, and prescribers’ disciplines. The information was categorized and captured in Microsoft Excel to analyze and create figures and tables. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared, and z-tests to compare pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 prescription patterns in RStudio. From an initial pool of 44,067 patient consultations, a systematic random sample of 698 records met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study. The sample was divided between pre-COVID-19 (n = 350) and COVID-19 (n = 348). A significant increase in antibiotic prescriptions was found during COVID-19 (1571 prescriptions) compared to pre-COVID-19 (1109 prescriptions). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin and metronidazole. Specifically, amoxicillin was used in most cases before and during COVID-19. The combination of amoxicillin with metronidazole increased from 16.6% pre-COVID-19 to 24.4% COVID-19. It was found that many of the antibiotics prescribed from both periods were not clinically indicated (53.1% pre-COVID-19 and 54.3% COVID-19). The authors concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased antibiotic prescriptions despite fewer in-person consultations. This was likely due to insufficient surgical intervention and reliance on antibiotics to treat dental conditions. The lack of proper antibiotic use raises concerns regarding dental practitioners’ appropriate use of antibiotics. There is an urgent need for improved antibiotic stewardship to prevent the misuse and growing public health issue of antimicrobial resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
期刊最新文献
Do antibiotics prior to dental extractions reduce adverse post-operative outcomes? Comparative evaluation of pit & fissure sealant retention using cotton roll & rubber dam isolation techniques - a systematic review & meta-analysis. Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate implant placement and immediate loading in aesthetic zone-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of photobiomodulation with low-level lasers on the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: an umbrella review. Applications of AI-based deep learning models for detecting dental caries on intraoral images - a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1