Benjamin Arnold Brakel, Alexander D Rebchuk, Johanna Ospel, Yimin Chen, Manraj Ks Heran, Mayank Goyal, Michael D Hill, Zhongrong Miao, Xiaochuan Huo, Simona Sacco, Shadi Yaghi, Ton Duy Mai, Götz Thomalla, Gregoire Boulouis, Hiroshi Yamagami, Wei Hu, Simon Nagel, Volker Puetz, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Jelle Demeestere, Zhongming Qiu, Mohamad Abdalkader, Sami Al Kasab, James E Siegler, Daniel Strbian, Urs Fischer, Jonathan M Coutinho, Anita van de Munckhof, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Bruce Campbell, Jean Raymond, Xunming Ji, Gustavo Saposnik, Thanh N Nguyen, Thalia Shoshana Field
{"title":"治疗脑静脉血栓的血管内疗法的国际实践模式和前景。","authors":"Benjamin Arnold Brakel, Alexander D Rebchuk, Johanna Ospel, Yimin Chen, Manraj Ks Heran, Mayank Goyal, Michael D Hill, Zhongrong Miao, Xiaochuan Huo, Simona Sacco, Shadi Yaghi, Ton Duy Mai, Götz Thomalla, Gregoire Boulouis, Hiroshi Yamagami, Wei Hu, Simon Nagel, Volker Puetz, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Jelle Demeestere, Zhongming Qiu, Mohamad Abdalkader, Sami Al Kasab, James E Siegler, Daniel Strbian, Urs Fischer, Jonathan M Coutinho, Anita van de Munckhof, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Bruce Campbell, Jean Raymond, Xunming Ji, Gustavo Saposnik, Thanh N Nguyen, Thalia Shoshana Field","doi":"10.1177/17474930241304206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) accounts for 0.5-1% of all strokes. The role of endovascular therapy (EVT) in the management of CVT remains controversial and variations in practice patterns are not well known.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Here, we present a comprehensive, international characterization of practice patterns and perspectives on the use of EVT for CVT.Methods A comprehensive 42-question survey was distributed to stroke clinicians globally from May-October 2023, asking about practice patterns and perspectives on the use of EVT for CVT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate was 31% (863 respondents of 2744 invited) across 61 countries. The majority of respondents (74%) supported the use of EVT for CVT in certain clinical situations. Key considerations for decision-making in using EVT favored clinical over radiographic/procedural factors and included worsening level of consciousness (86%) and worsening neurological deficits (76%). In the past three years, 56% of respondents used EVT for the treatment of CVT, with most (49.5%) involved in 2-5 cases. Among interventionalists, significant variability existed in the techniques used for EVT (p<0.001), with aspiration thrombectomy (56%) and stent retriever (51%) being the most used overall. Regionally, interventionalists from China predominately used intra-sinus heparin (56%), while this technique was most commonly ranked as \"never indicated\" throughout the rest of the world (23%). Post-procedure, low molecular weight heparin was the most used anticoagulant (83%), although North American respondents favored unfractionated heparin (37%), while imaging was primarily split between magnetic resonance (71.8%) and computed tomography (65.9%) arteriography or venography.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey reveals significant heterogeneity in approaches to EVT for CVT, and provides a comprehensive characterization of indications, techniques and long-term management used by clinicians internationally. This resource will aid in optimizing patient selection and endovascular treatments for future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930241304206"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International practice patterns and perspectives on endovascular therapy for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Arnold Brakel, Alexander D Rebchuk, Johanna Ospel, Yimin Chen, Manraj Ks Heran, Mayank Goyal, Michael D Hill, Zhongrong Miao, Xiaochuan Huo, Simona Sacco, Shadi Yaghi, Ton Duy Mai, Götz Thomalla, Gregoire Boulouis, Hiroshi Yamagami, Wei Hu, Simon Nagel, Volker Puetz, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Jelle Demeestere, Zhongming Qiu, Mohamad Abdalkader, Sami Al Kasab, James E Siegler, Daniel Strbian, Urs Fischer, Jonathan M Coutinho, Anita van de Munckhof, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Bruce Campbell, Jean Raymond, Xunming Ji, Gustavo Saposnik, Thanh N Nguyen, Thalia Shoshana Field\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17474930241304206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) accounts for 0.5-1% of all strokes. The role of endovascular therapy (EVT) in the management of CVT remains controversial and variations in practice patterns are not well known.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Here, we present a comprehensive, international characterization of practice patterns and perspectives on the use of EVT for CVT.Methods A comprehensive 42-question survey was distributed to stroke clinicians globally from May-October 2023, asking about practice patterns and perspectives on the use of EVT for CVT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate was 31% (863 respondents of 2744 invited) across 61 countries. The majority of respondents (74%) supported the use of EVT for CVT in certain clinical situations. Key considerations for decision-making in using EVT favored clinical over radiographic/procedural factors and included worsening level of consciousness (86%) and worsening neurological deficits (76%). In the past three years, 56% of respondents used EVT for the treatment of CVT, with most (49.5%) involved in 2-5 cases. Among interventionalists, significant variability existed in the techniques used for EVT (p<0.001), with aspiration thrombectomy (56%) and stent retriever (51%) being the most used overall. Regionally, interventionalists from China predominately used intra-sinus heparin (56%), while this technique was most commonly ranked as \\\"never indicated\\\" throughout the rest of the world (23%). Post-procedure, low molecular weight heparin was the most used anticoagulant (83%), although North American respondents favored unfractionated heparin (37%), while imaging was primarily split between magnetic resonance (71.8%) and computed tomography (65.9%) arteriography or venography.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey reveals significant heterogeneity in approaches to EVT for CVT, and provides a comprehensive characterization of indications, techniques and long-term management used by clinicians internationally. This resource will aid in optimizing patient selection and endovascular treatments for future trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17474930241304206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241304206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241304206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
International practice patterns and perspectives on endovascular therapy for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis.
Background: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) accounts for 0.5-1% of all strokes. The role of endovascular therapy (EVT) in the management of CVT remains controversial and variations in practice patterns are not well known.
Aims: Here, we present a comprehensive, international characterization of practice patterns and perspectives on the use of EVT for CVT.Methods A comprehensive 42-question survey was distributed to stroke clinicians globally from May-October 2023, asking about practice patterns and perspectives on the use of EVT for CVT.
Results: The overall response rate was 31% (863 respondents of 2744 invited) across 61 countries. The majority of respondents (74%) supported the use of EVT for CVT in certain clinical situations. Key considerations for decision-making in using EVT favored clinical over radiographic/procedural factors and included worsening level of consciousness (86%) and worsening neurological deficits (76%). In the past three years, 56% of respondents used EVT for the treatment of CVT, with most (49.5%) involved in 2-5 cases. Among interventionalists, significant variability existed in the techniques used for EVT (p<0.001), with aspiration thrombectomy (56%) and stent retriever (51%) being the most used overall. Regionally, interventionalists from China predominately used intra-sinus heparin (56%), while this technique was most commonly ranked as "never indicated" throughout the rest of the world (23%). Post-procedure, low molecular weight heparin was the most used anticoagulant (83%), although North American respondents favored unfractionated heparin (37%), while imaging was primarily split between magnetic resonance (71.8%) and computed tomography (65.9%) arteriography or venography.
Conclusions: Our survey reveals significant heterogeneity in approaches to EVT for CVT, and provides a comprehensive characterization of indications, techniques and long-term management used by clinicians internationally. This resource will aid in optimizing patient selection and endovascular treatments for future trials.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.