Manyata Srivastava, Annu Gulia, Ashish Datt Upadhyay, Kamalesh Kumar Patel, Mari Jeeva Sankar, Anju Sinha, Pradeep Kumar
{"title":"补充铁-叶酸对产妇和新生儿预后的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Manyata Srivastava, Annu Gulia, Ashish Datt Upadhyay, Kamalesh Kumar Patel, Mari Jeeva Sankar, Anju Sinha, Pradeep Kumar","doi":"10.1177/02601060241299010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background & Aims:</b> Iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation is widely recommended as both a preventive and therapeutic measure for pregnant women. Despite its widespread use, there is limited research exploring adherence to IFA supplementation during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of IFA supplementation in improving pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search on PubMed, Google Scholar, EMbase and Trip databases was conducted for relevant studies published up to May 31, 2024. Outcomes measured were preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), neonatal mortality, perinatal mortality, small for gestational age (SGA) and stillbirth. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), sensitivity analysis, publication bias, trial sequential analysis and quality assessment of the included studies were performed. <b>Results:</b> Eleven studies involving a total of 42,458 pregnant women who received IFA supplementation and 16,351 women who received folic acid (FA) alone or Control (no supplementation) were included. A significant reduction in overall neonatal mortality (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.87) as well as in subgroup analyses (IFA vs. control and IFA vs. FA) was observed. However, a decrease in incidence of LBW was noted only in IFA vs. control group (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90). No significant association was found for overall LBW (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.08-2.76), PTB (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.09-3.50), perinatal mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.69-1.04), SGA (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.86-1.12) and stillbirth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.48-1.16) when comparing to IFA vs. control and IFA vs. FA group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings provide strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of IFA supplementation in reducing neonatal mortality and LBW among pregnant women, highlighting its importance in prenatal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060241299010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of iron-folic acid supplementation on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review & meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Manyata Srivastava, Annu Gulia, Ashish Datt Upadhyay, Kamalesh Kumar Patel, Mari Jeeva Sankar, Anju Sinha, Pradeep Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02601060241299010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background & Aims:</b> Iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation is widely recommended as both a preventive and therapeutic measure for pregnant women. Despite its widespread use, there is limited research exploring adherence to IFA supplementation during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of IFA supplementation in improving pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search on PubMed, Google Scholar, EMbase and Trip databases was conducted for relevant studies published up to May 31, 2024. Outcomes measured were preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), neonatal mortality, perinatal mortality, small for gestational age (SGA) and stillbirth. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), sensitivity analysis, publication bias, trial sequential analysis and quality assessment of the included studies were performed. <b>Results:</b> Eleven studies involving a total of 42,458 pregnant women who received IFA supplementation and 16,351 women who received folic acid (FA) alone or Control (no supplementation) were included. A significant reduction in overall neonatal mortality (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.87) as well as in subgroup analyses (IFA vs. control and IFA vs. FA) was observed. However, a decrease in incidence of LBW was noted only in IFA vs. control group (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90). No significant association was found for overall LBW (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.08-2.76), PTB (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.09-3.50), perinatal mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.69-1.04), SGA (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.86-1.12) and stillbirth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.48-1.16) when comparing to IFA vs. control and IFA vs. FA group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings provide strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of IFA supplementation in reducing neonatal mortality and LBW among pregnant women, highlighting its importance in prenatal care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2601060241299010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241299010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241299010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:铁-叶酸(IFA)补充剂被广泛推荐为孕妇的预防和治疗措施。尽管叶酸补充剂被广泛使用,但有关孕期坚持补充叶酸及其对孕产妇和新生儿预后影响的研究却十分有限。本研究旨在评估补充 IFA 对改善妊娠和新生儿预后的效果。研究方法在 PubMed、Google Scholar、EMbase 和 Trip 数据库中全面检索了截至 2024 年 5 月 31 日发表的相关研究。研究结果包括早产(PTB)、低出生体重(LBW)、新生儿死亡率、围产期死亡率、胎龄小(SGA)和死胎。对纳入的研究进行了汇总风险比(RRs)及 95% 置信区间(CIs)、敏感性分析、发表偏倚、试验顺序分析和质量评估。研究结果共纳入了 11 项研究,涉及 42,458 名接受 IFA 补充剂的孕妇和 16,351 名仅接受叶酸 (FA) 补充剂或对照组(无补充剂)的孕妇。在总体新生儿死亡率(RR = 0.73,95% CI:0.61-0.87)以及亚组分析(IFA 与对照组、IFA 与 FA)中均观察到明显降低。然而,只有在 IFA 组与对照组相比,低出生体重儿的发生率有所下降(RR = 0.79,95% CI:0.69-0.90)。在 IFA 组与对照组和 IFA 组与 FA 组的比较中,总体低体重儿(RR = 0.48,95% CI:0.08-2.76)、PTB(RR = 0.56,95% CI:0.09-3.50)、围产期死亡率(RR = 0.85,95% CI:0.69-1.04)、SGA(RR = 0.98,95% CI:0.86-1.12)和死胎(RR = 0.75,95% CI:0.48-1.16)均无明显相关性。结论我们的研究结果提供了有力的证据,证明补充 IFA 能有效降低孕妇的新生儿死亡率和低出生体重儿率,突出了其在产前保健中的重要性。
Impact of iron-folic acid supplementation on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review & meta-analysis.
Background & Aims: Iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation is widely recommended as both a preventive and therapeutic measure for pregnant women. Despite its widespread use, there is limited research exploring adherence to IFA supplementation during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of IFA supplementation in improving pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search on PubMed, Google Scholar, EMbase and Trip databases was conducted for relevant studies published up to May 31, 2024. Outcomes measured were preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), neonatal mortality, perinatal mortality, small for gestational age (SGA) and stillbirth. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), sensitivity analysis, publication bias, trial sequential analysis and quality assessment of the included studies were performed. Results: Eleven studies involving a total of 42,458 pregnant women who received IFA supplementation and 16,351 women who received folic acid (FA) alone or Control (no supplementation) were included. A significant reduction in overall neonatal mortality (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.87) as well as in subgroup analyses (IFA vs. control and IFA vs. FA) was observed. However, a decrease in incidence of LBW was noted only in IFA vs. control group (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90). No significant association was found for overall LBW (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.08-2.76), PTB (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.09-3.50), perinatal mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.69-1.04), SGA (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.86-1.12) and stillbirth (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.48-1.16) when comparing to IFA vs. control and IFA vs. FA group. Conclusions: Our findings provide strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of IFA supplementation in reducing neonatal mortality and LBW among pregnant women, highlighting its importance in prenatal care.