{"title":"利用胃结肠韧带对十二指肠穿孔的改良 Graham 修补术进行改良:两例报告。","authors":"Saamia Shaikh, Erica Kozorosky, Megha Mehta, Osama Elsawy","doi":"10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroduodenal perforations are relatively common surgical emergencies with mortality rates as high as 40%. The Graham patch repair is one surgical approach but may need to be modified when the patient lacks viable omentum. The gastrocolic ligament can be utilized to repair these perforations for coverage.</p><p><strong>Presentation of cases: </strong>Case 1: A 77-year-old female with a complex history presented with severe abdominal pain and was found to have pneumoperitoneum on CT scan. She was found to have a first segment duodenal perforation. We employed a modified Graham patch omentopexy utilizing the gastrocolic ligament to repair the defect. She recovered well with no complications. Case 2: A 65-year-old male with multiple myeloma presented with chemotherapy intolerance and diffuse abdominal pain. CT scan demonstrated pneumoperitoneum. Upon surgical exploration, he was noted to have a 1 cm anterior duodenal perforation. He had almost no viable omentum and therefore underwent a modified Graham patch repair using the gastrocolic ligament. He recovered well with no complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There have been reports of patients with gastroduodenal perforation with suboptimal omentum who underwent modified repair with the falciform ligament or a jejunal serosal patch repair. The gastrocolic ligament was found to be an effective alternative for our cases. This approach is an attractive one due to its relative ease and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We described the use of the gastrocolic ligament as an alternative approach for gastroduodenal perforation in patients with suboptimal omentum. Further studies are needed to assess long term postoperative outcomes and establish best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48113,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","volume":"125 ","pages":"110614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modification of the modified Graham patch repair for duodenal perforation using the gastrocolic ligament: Two case reports.\",\"authors\":\"Saamia Shaikh, Erica Kozorosky, Megha Mehta, Osama Elsawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroduodenal perforations are relatively common surgical emergencies with mortality rates as high as 40%. The Graham patch repair is one surgical approach but may need to be modified when the patient lacks viable omentum. The gastrocolic ligament can be utilized to repair these perforations for coverage.</p><p><strong>Presentation of cases: </strong>Case 1: A 77-year-old female with a complex history presented with severe abdominal pain and was found to have pneumoperitoneum on CT scan. She was found to have a first segment duodenal perforation. We employed a modified Graham patch omentopexy utilizing the gastrocolic ligament to repair the defect. She recovered well with no complications. Case 2: A 65-year-old male with multiple myeloma presented with chemotherapy intolerance and diffuse abdominal pain. CT scan demonstrated pneumoperitoneum. Upon surgical exploration, he was noted to have a 1 cm anterior duodenal perforation. He had almost no viable omentum and therefore underwent a modified Graham patch repair using the gastrocolic ligament. He recovered well with no complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There have been reports of patients with gastroduodenal perforation with suboptimal omentum who underwent modified repair with the falciform ligament or a jejunal serosal patch repair. The gastrocolic ligament was found to be an effective alternative for our cases. This approach is an attractive one due to its relative ease and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We described the use of the gastrocolic ligament as an alternative approach for gastroduodenal perforation in patients with suboptimal omentum. Further studies are needed to assess long term postoperative outcomes and establish best practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"110614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言胃十二指肠穿孔是比较常见的外科急症,死亡率高达 40%。格拉汉姆补片修补术是一种手术方法,但在患者缺乏活力网膜的情况下可能需要修改。胃结肠韧带可用于修补这些穿孔:病例 1:一名 77 岁女性,病史复杂,因剧烈腹痛就诊,CT 扫描发现腹腔积气。她被发现患有十二指肠第一段穿孔。我们利用胃结肠韧带,采用改良 Graham 补片网膜切除术修复了缺损。她恢复良好,没有出现并发症。病例 2:一名 65 岁的男性多发性骨髓瘤患者因化疗不耐受和弥漫性腹痛前来就诊。CT 扫描显示腹腔积气。手术探查时发现他的十二指肠前部穿孔 1 厘米。他几乎没有可存活的网膜,因此接受了使用胃结肠韧带的改良 Graham 修补术。他恢复良好,没有出现并发症:讨论:有报道称,胃十二指肠穿孔患者的网膜不理想,但他们接受了改良的镰状韧带修补术或空肠浆膜修补术。在我们的病例中,我们发现胃结肠韧带是一种有效的替代方法。这种方法因其相对简便和有效而颇具吸引力:我们介绍了使用胃结肠韧带作为网膜欠佳患者胃十二指肠穿孔的替代方法。需要进一步研究以评估术后长期疗效并确立最佳实践。
Modification of the modified Graham patch repair for duodenal perforation using the gastrocolic ligament: Two case reports.
Introduction: Gastroduodenal perforations are relatively common surgical emergencies with mortality rates as high as 40%. The Graham patch repair is one surgical approach but may need to be modified when the patient lacks viable omentum. The gastrocolic ligament can be utilized to repair these perforations for coverage.
Presentation of cases: Case 1: A 77-year-old female with a complex history presented with severe abdominal pain and was found to have pneumoperitoneum on CT scan. She was found to have a first segment duodenal perforation. We employed a modified Graham patch omentopexy utilizing the gastrocolic ligament to repair the defect. She recovered well with no complications. Case 2: A 65-year-old male with multiple myeloma presented with chemotherapy intolerance and diffuse abdominal pain. CT scan demonstrated pneumoperitoneum. Upon surgical exploration, he was noted to have a 1 cm anterior duodenal perforation. He had almost no viable omentum and therefore underwent a modified Graham patch repair using the gastrocolic ligament. He recovered well with no complications.
Discussion: There have been reports of patients with gastroduodenal perforation with suboptimal omentum who underwent modified repair with the falciform ligament or a jejunal serosal patch repair. The gastrocolic ligament was found to be an effective alternative for our cases. This approach is an attractive one due to its relative ease and effectiveness.
Conclusion: We described the use of the gastrocolic ligament as an alternative approach for gastroduodenal perforation in patients with suboptimal omentum. Further studies are needed to assess long term postoperative outcomes and establish best practices.