Sarah Kirsch, Yousra Elsir, Katie Shelford, Janessa Vail, Anne Wildermuth
{"title":"降低再入院率计划惩罚了安全网医院的临床医生。","authors":"Sarah Kirsch, Yousra Elsir, Katie Shelford, Janessa Vail, Anne Wildermuth","doi":"10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), started under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was created with the intention to improve healthcare quality and costs. However, research on disparities in healthcare demonstrates the HRRP's protocolized risk-adjustment calculations neglect social factors, which consequently harms disadvantaged patient populations and unfairly contributes to clinician and hospital penalties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA literature review was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library to explore the inclusion of social factors such as socioeconomic status on risk-adjustment calculations, and their relation to healthcare disparities, penalties, and outcomes. Fifteen articles published in the past 10 years were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven (73%) of the 15 articles in this systematic review indicated that the HRRP potentiated healthcare disparities based on risk-adjustment calculation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review strongly suggests modifying the HRRP risk-adjustment calculations to include social risk factors has the potential to equalize reimbursement for hospitals that serve the most vulnerable patients and reduce negative unintended consequences of the HRRP. Future studies are needed to produce more conclusive, consistent evidence on the effect of social risk factors in risk-adjustment calculations and associated outcomes and to determine how HRRP's risk-adjustment calculations can be modified to reduce disparities in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":48728,"journal":{"name":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","volume":"37 12","pages":"44-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital readmissions reduction program penalizes safety net hospital clinicians.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Kirsch, Yousra Elsir, Katie Shelford, Janessa Vail, Anne Wildermuth\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), started under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was created with the intention to improve healthcare quality and costs. However, research on disparities in healthcare demonstrates the HRRP's protocolized risk-adjustment calculations neglect social factors, which consequently harms disadvantaged patient populations and unfairly contributes to clinician and hospital penalties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA literature review was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library to explore the inclusion of social factors such as socioeconomic status on risk-adjustment calculations, and their relation to healthcare disparities, penalties, and outcomes. Fifteen articles published in the past 10 years were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven (73%) of the 15 articles in this systematic review indicated that the HRRP potentiated healthcare disparities based on risk-adjustment calculation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review strongly suggests modifying the HRRP risk-adjustment calculations to include social risk factors has the potential to equalize reimbursement for hospitals that serve the most vulnerable patients and reduce negative unintended consequences of the HRRP. Future studies are needed to produce more conclusive, consistent evidence on the effect of social risk factors in risk-adjustment calculations and associated outcomes and to determine how HRRP's risk-adjustment calculations can be modified to reduce disparities in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants\",\"volume\":\"37 12\",\"pages\":\"44-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:根据《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)启动、由医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)管理的 "降低再住院率计划"(Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program,HRRP)旨在改善医疗质量和成本。然而,有关医疗差距的研究表明,HRRP 的规程化风险调整计算忽略了社会因素,从而损害了弱势患者群体的利益,并不公平地造成了对临床医生和医院的处罚:方法: 我们使用 PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了 PRISMA 文献综述,以探讨将社会经济地位等社会因素纳入风险调整计算的情况,以及这些因素与医疗差异、处罚和结果之间的关系。对过去 10 年中发表的 15 篇文章进行了审查:在这 15 篇系统性综述文章中,有 11 篇(73%)文章指出,基于风险调整计算,HRRP 加剧了医疗差距:本综述有力地表明,修改 HRRP 风险调整计算方法以纳入社会风险因素,有可能使为最弱势患者提供服务的医院获得平等的补偿,并减少 HRRP 意外带来的负面影响。未来的研究需要就风险调整计算中社会风险因素的影响及相关结果提供更多确凿、一致的证据,并确定如何修改 HRRP 的风险调整计算以减少医疗保健中的差异。
Hospital readmissions reduction program penalizes safety net hospital clinicians.
Objective: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), started under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was created with the intention to improve healthcare quality and costs. However, research on disparities in healthcare demonstrates the HRRP's protocolized risk-adjustment calculations neglect social factors, which consequently harms disadvantaged patient populations and unfairly contributes to clinician and hospital penalties.
Methods: A PRISMA literature review was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library to explore the inclusion of social factors such as socioeconomic status on risk-adjustment calculations, and their relation to healthcare disparities, penalties, and outcomes. Fifteen articles published in the past 10 years were reviewed.
Results: Eleven (73%) of the 15 articles in this systematic review indicated that the HRRP potentiated healthcare disparities based on risk-adjustment calculation.
Conclusions: This review strongly suggests modifying the HRRP risk-adjustment calculations to include social risk factors has the potential to equalize reimbursement for hospitals that serve the most vulnerable patients and reduce negative unintended consequences of the HRRP. Future studies are needed to produce more conclusive, consistent evidence on the effect of social risk factors in risk-adjustment calculations and associated outcomes and to determine how HRRP's risk-adjustment calculations can be modified to reduce disparities in healthcare.
期刊介绍:
JAAPA is the peer-reviewed clinical journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA). Published for more than 25 years, its mission is to support the ongoing education and advancement of physician assistants (PAs) by publishing current information and research on clinical, health policy, and professional issues.
Published monthly, JAAPA''s award-winning editorial includes:
-Clinical review articles (with AAPA-approved Category I CME in each issue)-
Case reports-
Clinical departments-
Original health services research-
Articles on issues of professional interest to PAs