通过前路对肘关节可怕的三重损伤患者进行冠状面先行修复的效果:一项至少随访两年的前瞻性研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1186/s10195-024-00804-z
Wen-Chieh Chang, Ming-Fai Cheng, Kuei-Hsiang Hsu, Yu-Ping Su
{"title":"通过前路对肘关节可怕的三重损伤患者进行冠状面先行修复的效果:一项至少随访两年的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Wen-Chieh Chang, Ming-Fai Cheng, Kuei-Hsiang Hsu, Yu-Ping Su","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00804-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE), the indication and the appropriate approach and sequence for coronoid process (CP) fixation remain debatable. No gold standard protocol has been established for CP fixation. In this study, we evaluated the midterm outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with unstable TTIE.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included patients with TTIE who exhibited posterior or posterolateral subluxation/dislocation during examination under anesthesia (EUA) at our institute between January 2019 and December 2021. All patients underwent coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach, regardless of fragment size. After CP fixation, radial head fixation/replacement and lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair were performed through the lateral Kocher approach. Radiographic and functional (Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS] and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [DASH]) assessments were performed 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Complications such as recurrent subluxation/dislocation, synostosis, heterotopic ossification, traumatic arthritis, and stiffness were examined at the follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 27 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 29.9 (range 24-44) months. At the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arcs were 88.7° ± 14.7°, 107.9° ± 11.9°, 128.3° ± 15.5°, and 130.9° ± 15.3°; the mean supination-pronation arcs were 143.7° ± 9.9°, 160.4° ± 7.6°, 165.0° ± 6.0°, and 167.9° ± 4.9°; the mean DASH scores were 18.7 ± 5.7, 4.5 ± 6.1, 2.7 ± 6.5, and 2.0 ± 6.8; and the mean MEPS were 79.1 ± 10.3, 90.2 ± 8.3, 94.8 ± 6.6, and 95.9 ± 5.7, respectively. At the 24-month follow-up, 26 patients had excellent and 1 patient had good results according to MEPS. Only one patient had a complication: they exhibited stiffness and did not have a 30-130° flexion-extension arc at 24 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EUA findings, rather than fragment size alone, may be a good indicator of whether the CP needs to be repaired. Midterm follow-up results implied that coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach yields satisfactory functional outcomes with minimal complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with terrible triad injury of the elbow: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Chieh Chang, Ming-Fai Cheng, Kuei-Hsiang Hsu, Yu-Ping Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10195-024-00804-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE), the indication and the appropriate approach and sequence for coronoid process (CP) fixation remain debatable. No gold standard protocol has been established for CP fixation. In this study, we evaluated the midterm outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with unstable TTIE.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included patients with TTIE who exhibited posterior or posterolateral subluxation/dislocation during examination under anesthesia (EUA) at our institute between January 2019 and December 2021. All patients underwent coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach, regardless of fragment size. After CP fixation, radial head fixation/replacement and lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair were performed through the lateral Kocher approach. Radiographic and functional (Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS] and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [DASH]) assessments were performed 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Complications such as recurrent subluxation/dislocation, synostosis, heterotopic ossification, traumatic arthritis, and stiffness were examined at the follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 27 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 29.9 (range 24-44) months. At the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arcs were 88.7° ± 14.7°, 107.9° ± 11.9°, 128.3° ± 15.5°, and 130.9° ± 15.3°; the mean supination-pronation arcs were 143.7° ± 9.9°, 160.4° ± 7.6°, 165.0° ± 6.0°, and 167.9° ± 4.9°; the mean DASH scores were 18.7 ± 5.7, 4.5 ± 6.1, 2.7 ± 6.5, and 2.0 ± 6.8; and the mean MEPS were 79.1 ± 10.3, 90.2 ± 8.3, 94.8 ± 6.6, and 95.9 ± 5.7, respectively. At the 24-month follow-up, 26 patients had excellent and 1 patient had good results according to MEPS. Only one patient had a complication: they exhibited stiffness and did not have a 30-130° flexion-extension arc at 24 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EUA findings, rather than fragment size alone, may be a good indicator of whether the CP needs to be repaired. Midterm follow-up results implied that coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach yields satisfactory functional outcomes with minimal complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic level II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00804-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00804-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在治疗可怕的肘关节三联症损伤(TTIE)时,冠状突(CP)固定的适应症、适当的方法和顺序仍存在争议。目前还没有为 CP 固定制定金标准方案。在这项研究中,我们评估了不稳定 TTIE 患者通过前路进行冠状突先行修复的中期疗效:这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了2019年1月至2021年12月期间在我院进行麻醉下检查(EUA)时表现出后方或后外侧半脱位/脱位的TTIE患者。无论碎片大小,所有患者均通过前路进行冠状面先行修复。CP固定后,通过外侧Kocher入路进行桡骨头固定/置换和外侧尺侧副韧带修复。术后3、6、12和24个月分别进行X光和功能(梅奥肘关节功能评分[MEPS]和手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分[DASH])评估。随访时还检查了并发症,如复发性半脱位/脱位、骨突、异位骨化、创伤性关节炎和僵硬:分析包括 27 名患者。平均随访时间为 29.9 个月(24-44 个月)。在 3 个月、6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月的随访中,平均屈伸弧度分别为 88.7°±14.7°、107.9°±11.9°、128.3°±15.5°和 130.9°±15.3°;平均仰俯弧度分别为 143.7°±9.9°、160.4°±7.6°、165.0° ± 6.0° 和 167.9° ± 4.9°;平均 DASH 评分分别为 18.7 ± 5.7、4.5 ± 6.1、2.7 ± 6.5 和 2.0 ± 6.8;平均 MEPS 分别为 79.1 ± 10.3、90.2 ± 8.3、94.8 ± 6.6 和 95.9 ± 5.7。在 24 个月的随访中,26 名患者的 MEPS 结果为优,1 名患者的 MEPS 结果为良。只有一名患者出现了并发症:术后24个月时表现出僵硬,屈伸弧度没有达到30-130°:结论:EUA结果,而非碎片大小,可能是CP是否需要修复的良好指标。中期随访结果表明,通过前路进行冠状面先行修复可获得令人满意的功能性结果,且并发症极少:证据级别:治疗级别II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with terrible triad injury of the elbow: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Background: In the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE), the indication and the appropriate approach and sequence for coronoid process (CP) fixation remain debatable. No gold standard protocol has been established for CP fixation. In this study, we evaluated the midterm outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with unstable TTIE.

Materials and methods: This prospective observational study included patients with TTIE who exhibited posterior or posterolateral subluxation/dislocation during examination under anesthesia (EUA) at our institute between January 2019 and December 2021. All patients underwent coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach, regardless of fragment size. After CP fixation, radial head fixation/replacement and lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair were performed through the lateral Kocher approach. Radiographic and functional (Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS] and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [DASH]) assessments were performed 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Complications such as recurrent subluxation/dislocation, synostosis, heterotopic ossification, traumatic arthritis, and stiffness were examined at the follow-up visits.

Results: The analysis included 27 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 29.9 (range 24-44) months. At the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arcs were 88.7° ± 14.7°, 107.9° ± 11.9°, 128.3° ± 15.5°, and 130.9° ± 15.3°; the mean supination-pronation arcs were 143.7° ± 9.9°, 160.4° ± 7.6°, 165.0° ± 6.0°, and 167.9° ± 4.9°; the mean DASH scores were 18.7 ± 5.7, 4.5 ± 6.1, 2.7 ± 6.5, and 2.0 ± 6.8; and the mean MEPS were 79.1 ± 10.3, 90.2 ± 8.3, 94.8 ± 6.6, and 95.9 ± 5.7, respectively. At the 24-month follow-up, 26 patients had excellent and 1 patient had good results according to MEPS. Only one patient had a complication: they exhibited stiffness and did not have a 30-130° flexion-extension arc at 24 months postoperatively.

Conclusions: The EUA findings, rather than fragment size alone, may be a good indicator of whether the CP needs to be repaired. Midterm follow-up results implied that coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach yields satisfactory functional outcomes with minimal complications.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic level II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of coronoid-first repair through an anterior approach in patients with terrible triad injury of the elbow: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Novel perspectives on early diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome: the role of admission blood tests. Subsidence of the Corail stem in total hip arthroplasty: no influence of bony contact. No difference in surgical time and total theatre time between robotically assisted and computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. Is there a difference in pelvic and femoral morphology in early periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1