Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1186/s10195-026-00899-6
Mahmoud Fahmy, Ahmed Hazem Abdelazeem, Mostafa Ahmed Shawky
Introduction: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common hip disorder in adolescents and may lead to femoroacetabular impingement, early osteoarthritis, and long-term functional disability if inadequately treated. While in situ pinning remains the standard treatment for mild slips, it fails to correct the deformity in moderate and severe cases, potentially predisposing to degenerative changes. The modified Dunn procedure (MDP) was developed to restore proximal femoral anatomy through surgical hip dislocation while preserving vascular supply. The aim of the study is to evaluate the long-term radiological and functional outcomes of the MDP in patients with moderate (14 cases) and severe (10 cases) SCFE, and to assess the incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN), osteoarthritis, and other complications.
Methods: A prospective case series was conducted between August 2015 and January 2019 at a single tertiary institution. A total of 24 hips with moderate-to-severe SCFE and open physis were treated using the MDP via surgical hip dislocation. Mild and acute-only slips were excluded. MDP was used as a primary procedure, performed early in severe slips and in selected moderate slips after clinical assessment. Patients were followed clinically and radiologically for a mean duration of 84 ± 2.6 months (range 80-88 months). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score. Radiographic outcomes and complications, including AVN and secondary arthritis, were documented. Fixation was performed using Schanz screws, cannulated screws, or K-wires according to intraoperative findings.
Results: The mean preoperative slip angle (48.3° ± 7.2°) significantly improved postoperatively (11.4° ± 3.1°, p < 0.001). HHS improved from a preoperative mean of 70.4 ± 5.8 to 92.9 ± 4.2 at final follow-up (p < 0.001). The Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score improved from 13.8 ± 1.6 preoperatively to 17.5 ± 0.9 at final follow-up (p < 0.001). AVN developed in 4 out of 24 hips (16.7%). Arthritis developed in 2 out of 24 hips (8.3%, degenerative OA; no septic arthritis or chondrolysis), representing a total of 6 out of 24 hips (25%) with significant complications when combined with AVN. No cases of postoperative instability or wound infection occurred. Functional scores showed sustained improvement in the majority of patients.
Conclusions: MDP offers favorable long-term anatomical correction and functional recovery in moderate-to-severe SCFE. However, the risk of AVN and arthritis, particularly in unstable or severe cases, warrants careful patient selection and technical precision. Extended follow-up is essential to detect late complications and evaluate procedural durability.
简介:股骨头骨骺滑动(SCFE)是青少年中最常见的髋关节疾病,如果治疗不当,可能导致股髋臼撞击、早期骨关节炎和长期功能残疾。虽然原位钉钉仍然是轻度滑动的标准治疗方法,但在中度和重度病例中,它无法纠正畸形,可能导致退行性改变。改良的Dunn手术(MDP)用于通过手术髋关节脱位恢复股骨近端解剖,同时保留血管供应。该研究的目的是评估中度(14例)和重度(10例)SCFE患者MDP的长期放射学和功能预后,并评估无血管坏死(AVN)、骨关节炎和其他并发症的发生率。方法:2015年8月至2019年1月在一所高等教育机构进行前瞻性病例系列研究。共24髋中重度SCFE和开放性物理采用MDP通过手术髋关节脱位治疗。排除轻度和急性滑移。MDP被用作主要手术,在早期进行严重滑移,并在临床评估后选择中度滑移。对患者进行临床和影像学随访,平均随访时间84±2.6个月(80-88个月)。功能结果采用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和Merle d' aubign和Postel评分进行评估。影像学结果和并发症,包括AVN和继发性关节炎,被记录下来。根据术中发现使用Schanz螺钉、空心螺钉或k针进行固定。结果:术前平均滑移角(48.3°±7.2°)明显改善了术后(11.4°±3.1°)p。结论:MDP对中重度SCFE患者具有良好的长期解剖矫正和功能恢复效果。然而,AVN和关节炎的风险,特别是在不稳定或严重的情况下,需要谨慎的患者选择和技术精度。延长随访对于发现晚期并发症和评估手术持久性至关重要。
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of the modified Dunn procedure in moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a prospective case series with 7-year follow-up.","authors":"Mahmoud Fahmy, Ahmed Hazem Abdelazeem, Mostafa Ahmed Shawky","doi":"10.1186/s10195-026-00899-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-026-00899-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common hip disorder in adolescents and may lead to femoroacetabular impingement, early osteoarthritis, and long-term functional disability if inadequately treated. While in situ pinning remains the standard treatment for mild slips, it fails to correct the deformity in moderate and severe cases, potentially predisposing to degenerative changes. The modified Dunn procedure (MDP) was developed to restore proximal femoral anatomy through surgical hip dislocation while preserving vascular supply. The aim of the study is to evaluate the long-term radiological and functional outcomes of the MDP in patients with moderate (14 cases) and severe (10 cases) SCFE, and to assess the incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN), osteoarthritis, and other complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective case series was conducted between August 2015 and January 2019 at a single tertiary institution. A total of 24 hips with moderate-to-severe SCFE and open physis were treated using the MDP via surgical hip dislocation. Mild and acute-only slips were excluded. MDP was used as a primary procedure, performed early in severe slips and in selected moderate slips after clinical assessment. Patients were followed clinically and radiologically for a mean duration of 84 ± 2.6 months (range 80-88 months). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score. Radiographic outcomes and complications, including AVN and secondary arthritis, were documented. Fixation was performed using Schanz screws, cannulated screws, or K-wires according to intraoperative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean preoperative slip angle (48.3° ± 7.2°) significantly improved postoperatively (11.4° ± 3.1°, p < 0.001). HHS improved from a preoperative mean of 70.4 ± 5.8 to 92.9 ± 4.2 at final follow-up (p < 0.001). The Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score improved from 13.8 ± 1.6 preoperatively to 17.5 ± 0.9 at final follow-up (p < 0.001). AVN developed in 4 out of 24 hips (16.7%). Arthritis developed in 2 out of 24 hips (8.3%, degenerative OA; no septic arthritis or chondrolysis), representing a total of 6 out of 24 hips (25%) with significant complications when combined with AVN. No cases of postoperative instability or wound infection occurred. Functional scores showed sustained improvement in the majority of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDP offers favorable long-term anatomical correction and functional recovery in moderate-to-severe SCFE. However, the risk of AVN and arthritis, particularly in unstable or severe cases, warrants careful patient selection and technical precision. Extended follow-up is essential to detect late complications and evaluate procedural durability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the extent of fat infiltration (FI) in the rotator cuff (RC) muscles in more medial slices from the Y-shaped view (Y-view) on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assess whether these slices provide a more accurate prediction of the repairability of massive RC tears (massive RCTs).
Methods: The retrospective study included 57 patients with massive RCTs who successfully underwent arthroscopic surgery between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: the irreparable group and the reparable group. All patients underwent shoulder MRI covering the region from the acromion to the medial border of the scapula in oblique coronal and oblique sagittal orientations. The FI stage of the RC was assessed across three different views to determine which view most effectively predicts the repairability of patients with massive RCTs.
Results: The FI stage of the infraspinatus (IS) muscle across three distinct views demonstrated a significant correlation with the repairability of massive RCTs. The FI stage was more severe in the irreparable group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the area under the curve for the 1/2 scapula view (0.737) and the most severe view (0.745) exceeded that of the traditional Y-view (0.644). Paired-sample ROC curve analysis revealed a significant difference between the most severe view and the traditional Y-view. The number of slices from the Y-view to the 1/2 scapula view was 5.89 ± 1.2. The most severe view of the IS was defined as the slice indicating the most severe FI stage, which was observed in at least two slices (84% probability) or exclusively in a single slice (16% probability).
Conclusions: This study's conclusions are based on the following findings: (1) Applying the Goutallier classification confirmed that FI in massive RCTs can extend medially to the Y-view, with the most severe FI not confined to a standard anatomical plane; (2) The concept of the "most severe view"-a nonstandardized, non-reproducible MR plane-reflects the area of peak FI. In predicting the reparability of massive RCTs, FI assessment of the IS muscle from this view demonstrates certain advantages over the traditional Y-view; however, its predictive value remains moderate. Future research should therefore focus on developing improved imaging strategies and clarifying the precise relationship between FI progression and clinical outcomes.
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging-based fat infiltration grading improves reparability prediction in massive rotator cuff tears.","authors":"Qi Hu, Guoyin Zhang, Danxiu Wang, Tao-Hsin Tung, Jianrong Ding, Xiaobo Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s10195-026-00900-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-026-00900-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the extent of fat infiltration (FI) in the rotator cuff (RC) muscles in more medial slices from the Y-shaped view (Y-view) on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assess whether these slices provide a more accurate prediction of the repairability of massive RC tears (massive RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study included 57 patients with massive RCTs who successfully underwent arthroscopic surgery between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: the irreparable group and the reparable group. All patients underwent shoulder MRI covering the region from the acromion to the medial border of the scapula in oblique coronal and oblique sagittal orientations. The FI stage of the RC was assessed across three different views to determine which view most effectively predicts the repairability of patients with massive RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FI stage of the infraspinatus (IS) muscle across three distinct views demonstrated a significant correlation with the repairability of massive RCTs. The FI stage was more severe in the irreparable group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the area under the curve for the 1/2 scapula view (0.737) and the most severe view (0.745) exceeded that of the traditional Y-view (0.644). Paired-sample ROC curve analysis revealed a significant difference between the most severe view and the traditional Y-view. The number of slices from the Y-view to the 1/2 scapula view was 5.89 ± 1.2. The most severe view of the IS was defined as the slice indicating the most severe FI stage, which was observed in at least two slices (84% probability) or exclusively in a single slice (16% probability).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study's conclusions are based on the following findings: (1) Applying the Goutallier classification confirmed that FI in massive RCTs can extend medially to the Y-view, with the most severe FI not confined to a standard anatomical plane; (2) The concept of the \"most severe view\"-a nonstandardized, non-reproducible MR plane-reflects the area of peak FI. In predicting the reparability of massive RCTs, FI assessment of the IS muscle from this view demonstrates certain advantages over the traditional Y-view; however, its predictive value remains moderate. Future research should therefore focus on developing improved imaging strategies and clarifying the precise relationship between FI progression and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV; case-control study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1186/s10195-026-00902-0
Antonio G Colombini, Peter Rab, Arno A Macken, Madu N Soares, Michael Kimmeyer, Igor J Shirinskiy, Ion-Andrei Popescu, Laurent Lafosse, Geert Alexander Buijze, Thibault Lafosse
Background: Although reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with concomitant latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) has been shown to effectively treat external rotation (ER) deficits, there are limited data regarding its outcomes with modern implants and its impact on activities of daily living (ADLs) requiring ER. The purpose of this study was to assess the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of rTSA with concomitant isolated LDT in patients with an ER lag sign and posterior rotator cuff deficiency.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up included consecutive patients who underwent rTSA with concomitant isolated LDT between 2010 and 2022 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Primary outcomes included the resolution of ER lag sign, active ER, and the Activities of Daily Living and External Rotation (ADLER) score. Secondary outcomes included the Auto-Constant Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), activities of daily living requiring internal rotation (ADLIR) score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and radiographic analysis of standardized radiographs.
Results: In total, 32 procedures in 32 patients were identified. Of these, 22 procedures in 22 patients (68% female, 72.9 ± 8.4 years at surgery) were available for follow-up at 4.8 ± 2.2 years postoperatively (response rate 73%). The ER lag sign resolved in 95.5% of patients, the active ER improved significantly from -13° (-20-0°) preoperatively to 10° (0-20°) postoperatively (p = 0.002). The ADLER score increased from 20 (18-21.5) to 30 (28-30, p < 0.001). The CS improved from 32 (25-52) to 71 (67-75, p < 0.001) and the SSV from 30 (28-40) to 80 (65-100, p = 0.002), and low pain levels were reported. Internal rotation (p = 1) and the ADLIR score (p = 0.56) did not improve or decrease. No revisions or complications were observed.
Conclusions: rTSA with concomitant isolated LDT resulted in favorable clinical, functional, and radiographic mid-term outcomes, with a high rate of resolved external rotation lag sign and a significant improvement in activities of daily life that require ER. This procedure should be considered a viable treatment option in patients undergoing rTSA with posterior rotator cuff deficiency and an ER lag sign.
{"title":"Mid-term clinical and functional outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer.","authors":"Antonio G Colombini, Peter Rab, Arno A Macken, Madu N Soares, Michael Kimmeyer, Igor J Shirinskiy, Ion-Andrei Popescu, Laurent Lafosse, Geert Alexander Buijze, Thibault Lafosse","doi":"10.1186/s10195-026-00902-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-026-00902-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with concomitant latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) has been shown to effectively treat external rotation (ER) deficits, there are limited data regarding its outcomes with modern implants and its impact on activities of daily living (ADLs) requiring ER. The purpose of this study was to assess the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of rTSA with concomitant isolated LDT in patients with an ER lag sign and posterior rotator cuff deficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up included consecutive patients who underwent rTSA with concomitant isolated LDT between 2010 and 2022 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Primary outcomes included the resolution of ER lag sign, active ER, and the Activities of Daily Living and External Rotation (ADLER) score. Secondary outcomes included the Auto-Constant Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), activities of daily living requiring internal rotation (ADLIR) score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and radiographic analysis of standardized radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 32 procedures in 32 patients were identified. Of these, 22 procedures in 22 patients (68% female, 72.9 ± 8.4 years at surgery) were available for follow-up at 4.8 ± 2.2 years postoperatively (response rate 73%). The ER lag sign resolved in 95.5% of patients, the active ER improved significantly from -13° (-20-0°) preoperatively to 10° (0-20°) postoperatively (p = 0.002). The ADLER score increased from 20 (18-21.5) to 30 (28-30, p < 0.001). The CS improved from 32 (25-52) to 71 (67-75, p < 0.001) and the SSV from 30 (28-40) to 80 (65-100, p = 0.002), and low pain levels were reported. Internal rotation (p = 1) and the ADLIR score (p = 0.56) did not improve or decrease. No revisions or complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>rTSA with concomitant isolated LDT resulted in favorable clinical, functional, and radiographic mid-term outcomes, with a high rate of resolved external rotation lag sign and a significant improvement in activities of daily life that require ER. This procedure should be considered a viable treatment option in patients undergoing rTSA with posterior rotator cuff deficiency and an ER lag sign.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1186/s10195-026-00901-1
Wenbo Mu, Atthakorn Jarusriwanna, Boyong Xu, Scot A Brown, Xiaogang Zhang, Alexander Dawes, Javad Parvizi, Li Cao
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most challenging complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Traditional management typically involves full revision to ensure comprehensive infection eradication. However, for patients with well-fixed implants, partial revision in a single-stage cementless approach may provide a viable alternative, potentially preserving bone stock and reducing operative time. The relative efficacy of this approach compared with full revision remains to be fully explored. This multicenter study aims to determine whether partial revision in cementless single-stage exchange surgery offers comparable infection control outcomes to full revision for select patients with well-fixed implants.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study involving 226 patients who underwent cementless single-stage exchange hip arthroplasty for PJI between 1 October 2013 and 31 July 2022. Patients were divided into partial revision (n = 61) and full revision (n = 165) groups. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as the absence of clinical symptoms and signs of infection at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Results: The success rates were 77.0% for the partial revision group and 80.0% for the full revision group, with no significant difference (p = 0.629). Both groups showed comparable 10-year survival rates for overall success and infection-free status. Patients with partial revision had significantly shorter operative times (137.3 versus 169.1 min, p < 0.001). Age ≥ 65 years (odds ratios (OR): 2.433, p = 0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3 (OR: 1.778, p = 0.030), and chronic kidney disease (OR: 3.467, p = 0.053) were identified as independent risk factors for reinfection in the partial revision group.
Conclusions: Partial cementless single-stage revision may offer comparable infection control to full revision in selected hip PJI cases with well-fixed implants, while reducing operative time. Given the retrospective design, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and future prospective studies are needed to confirm long-term outcomes, assess implant survival, and evaluate functional recovery.
{"title":"Partial versus full revision in cementless single-stage exchange for hip periprosthetic joint infection: a multicenter comparative study with 10-year survivorship analysis.","authors":"Wenbo Mu, Atthakorn Jarusriwanna, Boyong Xu, Scot A Brown, Xiaogang Zhang, Alexander Dawes, Javad Parvizi, Li Cao","doi":"10.1186/s10195-026-00901-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-026-00901-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most challenging complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Traditional management typically involves full revision to ensure comprehensive infection eradication. However, for patients with well-fixed implants, partial revision in a single-stage cementless approach may provide a viable alternative, potentially preserving bone stock and reducing operative time. The relative efficacy of this approach compared with full revision remains to be fully explored. This multicenter study aims to determine whether partial revision in cementless single-stage exchange surgery offers comparable infection control outcomes to full revision for select patients with well-fixed implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study involving 226 patients who underwent cementless single-stage exchange hip arthroplasty for PJI between 1 October 2013 and 31 July 2022. Patients were divided into partial revision (n = 61) and full revision (n = 165) groups. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as the absence of clinical symptoms and signs of infection at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rates were 77.0% for the partial revision group and 80.0% for the full revision group, with no significant difference (p = 0.629). Both groups showed comparable 10-year survival rates for overall success and infection-free status. Patients with partial revision had significantly shorter operative times (137.3 versus 169.1 min, p < 0.001). Age ≥ 65 years (odds ratios (OR): 2.433, p = 0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3 (OR: 1.778, p = 0.030), and chronic kidney disease (OR: 3.467, p = 0.053) were identified as independent risk factors for reinfection in the partial revision group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Partial cementless single-stage revision may offer comparable infection control to full revision in selected hip PJI cases with well-fixed implants, while reducing operative time. Given the retrospective design, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and future prospective studies are needed to confirm long-term outcomes, assess implant survival, and evaluate functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1186/s10195-026-00906-w
Yunan Lu, Chentao Xue, Federico Canavese, Sara De Salvo, Hetu Yao, Dianhua Huang, Ran Lin, Juan Zheng, Shunyou Chen
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the radiologic characteristics of irreducible pediatric femoral head fracture-dislocations to prevent potential iatrogenic femoral neck fractures (FNF) or separation of the proximal femoral epiphysis (SPFE).
Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who were skeletally immature and diagnosed with traumatic hip dislocations combined with femoral head fractures. The collected data included patient demographics, fracture classification, fragment ratio, combined injuries, urgent reductions, treatment strategies, complications, and final outcomes.
Results: We treated 12 patients with femoral head fractures and dislocations; 11 out of 12 patients underwent urgent closed reduction (91.7%). Six of the patients failed closed reduction and experienced FNF (n = 2, 33.3%) or SPFE (n = 4, 66.7%). Five patients presented with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after open reduction with internal fixation via a surgical hip dislocation approach, and two patients required further surgical treatment. Analysis of radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of irreducible femoral head fracture-dislocations revealed that the fractured femoral head was perched on the sharp angle of the posterior wall of the acetabulum, with a fragment ratio of 18-27%. After recognizing the irreducibility, one case with a fragment ratio of 26% underwent immediate open reduction without further attempts at closed reduction. This procedure preserved the natural hip joint, preventing FNF and SPFE.
Conclusions: For pediatric patients with irreducible femoral head fracture-dislocation injuries and a fragment ratio greater than 10%, repeated or forceful closed reduction may result in iatrogenic FNF or SPFE. Examining plain radiographs and CT images carefully before attempting reduction may help determine the safest treatment strategy.
{"title":"Iatrogenic femoral neck fractures or separation of the proximal femoral epiphysis during closed reduction of irreducible femoral head fracture-dislocations in children: a review of 12 cases.","authors":"Yunan Lu, Chentao Xue, Federico Canavese, Sara De Salvo, Hetu Yao, Dianhua Huang, Ran Lin, Juan Zheng, Shunyou Chen","doi":"10.1186/s10195-026-00906-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-026-00906-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the radiologic characteristics of irreducible pediatric femoral head fracture-dislocations to prevent potential iatrogenic femoral neck fractures (FNF) or separation of the proximal femoral epiphysis (SPFE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of patients who were skeletally immature and diagnosed with traumatic hip dislocations combined with femoral head fractures. The collected data included patient demographics, fracture classification, fragment ratio, combined injuries, urgent reductions, treatment strategies, complications, and final outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We treated 12 patients with femoral head fractures and dislocations; 11 out of 12 patients underwent urgent closed reduction (91.7%). Six of the patients failed closed reduction and experienced FNF (n = 2, 33.3%) or SPFE (n = 4, 66.7%). Five patients presented with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after open reduction with internal fixation via a surgical hip dislocation approach, and two patients required further surgical treatment. Analysis of radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of irreducible femoral head fracture-dislocations revealed that the fractured femoral head was perched on the sharp angle of the posterior wall of the acetabulum, with a fragment ratio of 18-27%. After recognizing the irreducibility, one case with a fragment ratio of 26% underwent immediate open reduction without further attempts at closed reduction. This procedure preserved the natural hip joint, preventing FNF and SPFE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pediatric patients with irreducible femoral head fracture-dislocation injuries and a fragment ratio greater than 10%, repeated or forceful closed reduction may result in iatrogenic FNF or SPFE. Examining plain radiographs and CT images carefully before attempting reduction may help determine the safest treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1186/s10195-026-00903-z
G Pedemonte-Parramón, E Reynaga, S Molinos, J Díez de Los Ríos, A Vivero, E García-Oltra, V López-Pérez, R Paredes, J A Hernández-Hermoso
Purpose: Late acute haematogenous total knee arthroplasty (LAH TKA) infections represent approximately 20% of all prosthetic infections. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a widely accepted treatment; however, it carries a significant risk of failure. The study aims to identify risk factors for DAIR failure in LAH TKA infections, focusing on blood cultures (BC) as a potential contributor.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 37 cases of LAH TKA infections from 2015 to 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: 20 in the success group (SG) and 17 in the failure group (FG). The study analyzes various factors, including demographics, comorbidities, serum and joint fluid biomarkers, blood and intraoperative cultures, prior infection or antibiotic use, and surgical and post-surgical variables.
Results: Positive BC were more frequent in the FG compared with the SG (P = 0.03), and were also more common in patients with a history of prior infection (P = 0.03). Logistic regression identified positive BC as the only significant predictor of DAIR failure (odds ratio (OR) 12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-18, P = 0.04), even after adjusting for other variables. Positive intraoperative cultures were more frequent in the FG, particularly in those with a prior infection history (P = 0.08), even if they were receiving antibiotics (P = 0.05).
Conclusions: Positive BC may be an additional risk factor for DAIR failure in LAH TKA. This highlights the importance of routinely performing BC during diagnosis.
{"title":"The presence of a positive blood culture should be regarded a risk factor for DAIR failure in cases of haematogenous total knee arthroplasty infection.","authors":"G Pedemonte-Parramón, E Reynaga, S Molinos, J Díez de Los Ríos, A Vivero, E García-Oltra, V López-Pérez, R Paredes, J A Hernández-Hermoso","doi":"10.1186/s10195-026-00903-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-026-00903-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Late acute haematogenous total knee arthroplasty (LAH TKA) infections represent approximately 20% of all prosthetic infections. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a widely accepted treatment; however, it carries a significant risk of failure. The study aims to identify risk factors for DAIR failure in LAH TKA infections, focusing on blood cultures (BC) as a potential contributor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 37 cases of LAH TKA infections from 2015 to 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: 20 in the success group (SG) and 17 in the failure group (FG). The study analyzes various factors, including demographics, comorbidities, serum and joint fluid biomarkers, blood and intraoperative cultures, prior infection or antibiotic use, and surgical and post-surgical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive BC were more frequent in the FG compared with the SG (P = 0.03), and were also more common in patients with a history of prior infection (P = 0.03). Logistic regression identified positive BC as the only significant predictor of DAIR failure (odds ratio (OR) 12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-18, P = 0.04), even after adjusting for other variables. Positive intraoperative cultures were more frequent in the FG, particularly in those with a prior infection history (P = 0.08), even if they were receiving antibiotics (P = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive BC may be an additional risk factor for DAIR failure in LAH TKA. This highlights the importance of routinely performing BC during diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1186/s10195-026-00904-y
Francisco Soler, Javier Hernández, José María Lamo-Espinosa, María Benlloch, Gonzalo Mariscal
Background: There is debate regarding the optimal timing of bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA), with simultaneous or staged approaches considered. Cost-effectiveness is an important factor that influences resource allocation. The main aim of this study was to assess the cost implications of bilateral simultaneous (sim-THA) versus staged (st-THA) total hip arthroplasty. The secondary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sim-THA compared those with of st-THA.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing simultaneous and staged bilateral THA in terms of cost, complications, length of hospital stay, and patient outcomes were eligible. Odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MD), and standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomised Studies (MINORS). Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.4 (Cochrane, Oxford, United Kingdom).
Results: A total of 20 observational studies including 13,984 patients were included. Sim-THA was associated with significantly lower total costs (SMD -0.54, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.16; p = 0.005) and shorter hospital stay (MD -2.90, 95% CI -4.38 to -1.42; p = 0.0001) than those in the st-THA group. Revisions were less frequent in the sim-THA group (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36-0.53; p < 0.00001). No differences were observed in mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.31-3.28; p = 0.98) or readmission rates (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.23-1.44; p = 0.24). The number of transfusions (OR 4.42, 95% CI 2.18-8.99; p < 0.0001) was lower in st-THA. Functionality (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.53; p < 0.0001) and pain scores (SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.33; p = 0.01) favored sim-THA.
Conclusions: A meta-analysis of 20 studies demonstrated that sim-THA offers economical and clinical advantages, including reduced hospital expenses and improved patient quality of life, despite a higher number of transfusions, with comparable surgical blood loss to standard THA.
背景:关于双侧全髋关节置换术(THA)的最佳时机,有争议,同时或分阶段入路考虑。成本效益是影响资源配置的重要因素。本研究的主要目的是评估双侧同步(sim-THA)与分期(st-THA)全髋关节置换术的成本影响。次要目的是评价sim-THA与st-THA的疗效和安全性。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。在费用、并发症、住院时间和患者结局方面比较同时和分阶段双侧THA的研究是合格的。计算95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)、平均差异(MD)和标准平均差异(SMD)。使用非随机研究方法学指数(methodology Index for Non-randomised Studies,未成年人)评估偏倚风险。meta分析使用Review Manager version 5.4 (Cochrane, Oxford, United Kingdom)进行。结果:共纳入20项观察性研究,13984例患者。与st-THA组相比,Sim-THA组的总成本显著降低(SMD -0.54, 95% CI -0.92至-0.16,p = 0.005),住院时间显著缩短(MD -2.90, 95% CI -4.38至-1.42,p = 0.0001)。结论:一项对20项研究的荟萃分析表明,sim-THA具有经济和临床优势,包括减少医院费用和改善患者生活质量,尽管输血次数较多,手术失血量与标准THA相当。
{"title":"Simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Francisco Soler, Javier Hernández, José María Lamo-Espinosa, María Benlloch, Gonzalo Mariscal","doi":"10.1186/s10195-026-00904-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-026-00904-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is debate regarding the optimal timing of bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA), with simultaneous or staged approaches considered. Cost-effectiveness is an important factor that influences resource allocation. The main aim of this study was to assess the cost implications of bilateral simultaneous (sim-THA) versus staged (st-THA) total hip arthroplasty. The secondary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sim-THA compared those with of st-THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing simultaneous and staged bilateral THA in terms of cost, complications, length of hospital stay, and patient outcomes were eligible. Odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MD), and standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomised Studies (MINORS). Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.4 (Cochrane, Oxford, United Kingdom).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 observational studies including 13,984 patients were included. Sim-THA was associated with significantly lower total costs (SMD -0.54, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.16; p = 0.005) and shorter hospital stay (MD -2.90, 95% CI -4.38 to -1.42; p = 0.0001) than those in the st-THA group. Revisions were less frequent in the sim-THA group (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36-0.53; p < 0.00001). No differences were observed in mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.31-3.28; p = 0.98) or readmission rates (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.23-1.44; p = 0.24). The number of transfusions (OR 4.42, 95% CI 2.18-8.99; p < 0.0001) was lower in st-THA. Functionality (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.53; p < 0.0001) and pain scores (SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.33; p = 0.01) favored sim-THA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A meta-analysis of 20 studies demonstrated that sim-THA offers economical and clinical advantages, including reduced hospital expenses and improved patient quality of life, despite a higher number of transfusions, with comparable surgical blood loss to standard THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1186/s10195-025-00897-0
Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Michael Kurt Memminger, Ulf Krister Hofmann
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate clinical outcome following surgical management of focal chondral defects in the knee, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used. To give these measures meaning, parameters such as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimally detectable change (MDC), clinically important difference (CID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) have been introduced. This systematic review investigated the MCID, SCB, CID, PASS and MDC of the most commonly used PROMs for assessing patients following surgical repair of focal chondral defects of the knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. All clinical studies investigating tools to assess the clinical relevance of PROMs in the surgical repair of focal chondral defects of the knee were reviewed. In April 2025, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The PROMs of interest included: the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and its related subscales activities of daily living (ADL), pain, quality of life (QoL), sports and recreational activities, and symptoms, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, the Tegner Lysholm knee scoring scale, the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and its related mental and physical component subscales, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS). The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) indicated a low to moderate risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic literature search yielded 524 articles. Only data from four studies (involving 421 patients) were included. All of these were non-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) employing a retrospective study design. Most reported thresholds for a significant change across the questionnaires ranged from 20 to 30 points on a 100-point scale, whereas PASS values ranged from 62 points in the IKDC to 87 points in the KOOS ADL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a comprehensive search strategy, only four studies met the inclusion criteria, underscoring that the parameters analysed remain overlooked in the scientific literature. Reported results for MCID, CID and MDC following cartilage repair are relatively consistent in magnitude, ranging from 10 to 20. Differences reported in the literature that fall below this range should be regarded as no improvement. For SCB and PASS, values were even higher, spanning from 20 to 30 and from 62 to 87 points in IKDC and KOOS ADL, respectively. Given the high standard of modern medical care, further development and validation of condition-specific PROMs sh
为了评估膝关节局灶性软骨缺损手术治疗后的临床结果,采用了患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。为了使这些测量具有意义,引入了诸如最小临床重要差异(MCID)、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)、最小可检测变化(MDC)、临床重要差异(CID)和实质性临床获益(SCB)等参数。本系统综述调查了最常用的PROMs的MCID、SCB、CID、PASS和MDC,用于评估膝关节局点软骨缺损手术修复后的患者。方法:本系统评价按照2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南和Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册的建议进行。我们回顾了所有的临床研究,以评估PROMs在膝关节局灶性软骨缺损手术修复中的临床意义。2025年4月,访问了以下数据库:PubMed, Web of Science和Embase。有关的prom包括:国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)调查问卷、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)及其相关亚量表日常生活活动(ADL)、疼痛、生活质量(QoL)、运动和娱乐活动、症状、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎(WOMAC)评分、Tegner Lysholm膝关节评分量表、SF-12短表及其相关心理和身体成分亚量表、简表36 (SF-36)和辛辛那提膝关节评分系统(CKRS)。非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)显示低至中等偏倚风险。结果:系统检索到文献524篇。仅纳入了4项研究(涉及421例患者)的数据。所有这些都是采用回顾性研究设计的非随机对照试验(rct)。在100分制量表中,大多数报告的重大变化阈值从20到30分不等,而通过值从IKDC的62分到kos ADL的87分不等。结论:尽管采用了全面的检索策略,但只有4项研究符合纳入标准,这强调了科学文献中所分析的参数仍然被忽视。软骨修复后MCID、CID和MDC的报道结果在数量级上相对一致,范围从10到20。文献中报道的差异低于这个范围应被视为没有改善。对于SCB和PASS,数值甚至更高,IKDC和oos ADL分别从20到30和62到87分不等。鉴于现代医疗的高水平,应考虑进一步开发和验证特定疾病的PROMs,以促进未来使用PROMs进行临床评价。证据等级:III级,系统评价。
{"title":"Clinical relevance of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical management of focal chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review.","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Michael Kurt Memminger, Ulf Krister Hofmann","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00897-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-025-00897-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate clinical outcome following surgical management of focal chondral defects in the knee, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used. To give these measures meaning, parameters such as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimally detectable change (MDC), clinically important difference (CID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) have been introduced. This systematic review investigated the MCID, SCB, CID, PASS and MDC of the most commonly used PROMs for assessing patients following surgical repair of focal chondral defects of the knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. All clinical studies investigating tools to assess the clinical relevance of PROMs in the surgical repair of focal chondral defects of the knee were reviewed. In April 2025, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The PROMs of interest included: the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and its related subscales activities of daily living (ADL), pain, quality of life (QoL), sports and recreational activities, and symptoms, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, the Tegner Lysholm knee scoring scale, the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and its related mental and physical component subscales, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS). The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) indicated a low to moderate risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic literature search yielded 524 articles. Only data from four studies (involving 421 patients) were included. All of these were non-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) employing a retrospective study design. Most reported thresholds for a significant change across the questionnaires ranged from 20 to 30 points on a 100-point scale, whereas PASS values ranged from 62 points in the IKDC to 87 points in the KOOS ADL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a comprehensive search strategy, only four studies met the inclusion criteria, underscoring that the parameters analysed remain overlooked in the scientific literature. Reported results for MCID, CID and MDC following cartilage repair are relatively consistent in magnitude, ranging from 10 to 20. Differences reported in the literature that fall below this range should be regarded as no improvement. For SCB and PASS, values were even higher, spanning from 20 to 30 and from 62 to 87 points in IKDC and KOOS ADL, respectively. Given the high standard of modern medical care, further development and validation of condition-specific PROMs sh","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12847531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1186/s10195-025-00886-3
Jesús Moreta, Héctor J Aguado, Pablo Castillón-Bernal, Josep M Muñoz-Vives, Pilar Camacho, Montsant Jornet-Gibert, Jordi Teixidor, Adela Pereda-Manso, Yaiza García-Sánchez, Cristina Ojeda-Thies, Pablo García-Portabella, Elvira Mateos Álvarez, David Noriega-González, María-Fe Muñoz-Moreno, Irene Arroyo-Hernantes, Begoña Aránzazu Álvarez-Ramos, Belén García-Medrano, Carmen Martínez-Sellés, Sergio Marín-Jiménez, Virginia García-Virto, Sergio País-Ortega, Adriana Acha, Jordi Tomás-Hernández, Jordi Selga-Marsà, José Vicente Andrés-Peiró, Carlos Piedra-Calle, Ferrán Blasco-Casado, Ernesto Guerra-Farfán, Jordi Querolt-Coll, Guillermo Triana-López de Santamaría, José M Hernández, Marina Renau-Cerrillo, Carles Gil-Aliberas, Anna Carreras-Castañer, Marian Vives-Barquiel, Eliam Ajuria Fernández, Eugenia Fernández Manzano, Unai García De Cortázar, Mirentxu Arrieta, Daniel Escobar, Estíbaliz Castrillo, Patricia Balvis Balvis, Maciej Denisiuk, Manuel Castro Menéndez, Sonsoles Pastor, Ane Larrazábal, Beatriz Olías-López, Patricia Amaya-Espinosa, Juan Boluda-Mengod, David González-Martín, Daniel López-Dorado, Juan Carlos Borrás-Cebrián, Carles Martínez-Pérez, Patricio Andrés Freile Pazmiño, Pablo Calavia-Calé, Miguel Ángel Suárez-Suárez, Lucía Lanuza-Lagunilla, Antonio García Arias, Julián Cabria-Fernández, Javier García-Coiradas, José Valle-Cruz, Jaime Sánchez Del Saz, Jesús Mora-Fernández, Pedro Lalueza-Andreu, César Bonome-Roel, María Ángeles Cano-Leira, Antonio Benjumea Carrasco, Ana López-de Pariza, Alexis Fernández-Juan, Carmen Sevillano-de la Puente, Miren Juldain-Mondragón, Jorge Guadilla Arsuaga, Eladio Saura-Sánchez, Sandra Giménez-Ibáñez, Plácido Sánchez-Gómez, F Javier Ricón-Recarey, Elena M García García, Francisco Cuadrado-Abajo, María Isabel Pérez-Núñez, Pedro Del Pozo-Manrique, Francisco Manuel García Navas-García, Ester García-Paredero, Ainhoa Guijarro-Valtueña, Teresa Beteta Robles, Inés Navas-Pernía, Ignasi De Villasante-Jirón, Teresa Serra Porta, Carmen Carrasco Becerra, Víctor Otero-Naveiro, Silvia Pena Paz, Inés Fernández-Billón Castrillo, Fátima Fernández-Dorado, Amaia Martínez-Menduiña, Víctor Vaquerizo-García, Antonio Murcia-Asensio, Elena Galián-Muñoz, Carmelo Marín-Martínez, Adrián Muñoz-Vicente, Nuria Plaza-Salazar, Carla Gámez-Asunción, Jennifer Benito-Santamaría, Paula Salgado-Tarrida, Oriol Prats-Puente, Alejandro Cuenca-Copete, Blas González-Montero, Luis Alejandro Giraldo-Vegas, Juan Mingo-Robinet, Ricardo Briso-Montiano, Amaya Barbería-Biurrun, Emma Escudero-Martínez, Laura Chouza-Montero, María Naharro-Tobío, Alfons Gasset-Teixidor, Andrea Domínguez-Ibarrola, J M Peñalver, Jorge Serrano-Sanz, Adrián Roche-Albero, Carlos Martín-Hernández, María Macho-Mier, José Carlos Saló-Cuenca, Jordi Espona Roselló, Guillermo Criado-Albillos, Hugo Gabriel Cabello-Benavides, David Alonso Nestar, Jerónimo González-Bernal, Josefa González-Santos, Jorge Cunchillos-Pascual, Jorge Martínez-Íñiguez Blasco, José Manuel Bogallo-Dorado, Alicia Ramírez-Roldán, Juan Ramón Cano-Porras, Fernando Marqués-López, Santos Martínez-Díaz, Pablo I Slullitel, Guido S Carabelli, Ignacio Astore, Bruno Rafael Boietti, Julio César Córdova-Peralta, Carlos Hernández-Pascual, Alfredo Rodríguez-Gangoso, Iván Dot-Pascuet, Ana Piñeiro-Borrero, José María Pérez-Sánchez, Alfonso Mandía-Martínez, Julio De Caso-Rodríguez, Jordi Martín-Marcuello, Miguel Benito-Mateo, Oiane Alda-Gastiain, Irene Corcuera-Elosegui, María Rosa González-Panisello, Nicolás Elizalde Pérez-Salazar, María De Sande-Díaz
Background: Periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty (FH-PPF) represent a severe complication, especially in elderly patients with compromised health. Traditionally, revision arthroplasty is recommended for B2-B3 FH-PPF, yet internal fixation has emerged as a debated alternative in select patients. The hypothesis was that fixation, in selected patients with B2-B3 FH-PPF, decreases mortality and surgical complication rates with the same functional outcomes as revision arthroplasty.
Materials and methods: PIPPAS is a multicenter prospective observational study. This cohort substudy includes 485 patients across 57 hospitals with B2-B3 FH-PPF between January 2021 and May 2023. Management strategy, revision or fixation, was at the attending surgeon's discretion. Propensity score matching, controlled for age, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (a-CCI), prefracture mobility, Pfeiffer scale, and ASA score, was done. Mortality risk factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results: Out of 485 patients, 164 received fixation, and 321 underwent revision. Fixation patients were older (88 versus 82 years, p < 0.001) and frailer. Fixation was associated with shorter hospital stay (13 versus 15 days, p = 0.003) but higher 1-year mortality (25% versus 14.3%, p = 0.04). There were no differences in medical or surgical complications (p = 0.83 and p = 0.36) at any time, but dislocation rate was higher in the revision group (p = 0.001). The 1-year mortality rate in patients with no weight-bearing restrictions was higher for the revision group (p = 0.01). The propensity score matching showed higher 1-year mortality rate in the fixation group but no differences in functional outcomes, complications, or up to 6-months mortality. In the multivariate analysis a-CCI, cognitive impairment, B3 fractures, and prefracture independent walking impairment were independent mortality risk factors.
Conclusions: Revision arthroplasty showed less 1-year mortality rate and weight-bearing restrictions than fixation. However, frail patients with B2-B3 FH-PPF managed with fixation allowing full weight-bearing showed a lower 1-year mortality rate. Fixation in B2-B3 FH-PPF is a treatment option in frail patients, while aiming for stable constructions allowing full weight-bearing.
{"title":"Internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty for Vancouver B2-B3 fractures: mortality and functional outcomes in frail patients. Insights from the PIPPAS study of 485 patients.","authors":"Jesús Moreta, Héctor J Aguado, Pablo Castillón-Bernal, Josep M Muñoz-Vives, Pilar Camacho, Montsant Jornet-Gibert, Jordi Teixidor, Adela Pereda-Manso, Yaiza García-Sánchez, Cristina Ojeda-Thies, Pablo García-Portabella, Elvira Mateos Álvarez, David Noriega-González, María-Fe Muñoz-Moreno, Irene Arroyo-Hernantes, Begoña Aránzazu Álvarez-Ramos, Belén García-Medrano, Carmen Martínez-Sellés, Sergio Marín-Jiménez, Virginia García-Virto, Sergio País-Ortega, Adriana Acha, Jordi Tomás-Hernández, Jordi Selga-Marsà, José Vicente Andrés-Peiró, Carlos Piedra-Calle, Ferrán Blasco-Casado, Ernesto Guerra-Farfán, Jordi Querolt-Coll, Guillermo Triana-López de Santamaría, José M Hernández, Marina Renau-Cerrillo, Carles Gil-Aliberas, Anna Carreras-Castañer, Marian Vives-Barquiel, Eliam Ajuria Fernández, Eugenia Fernández Manzano, Unai García De Cortázar, Mirentxu Arrieta, Daniel Escobar, Estíbaliz Castrillo, Patricia Balvis Balvis, Maciej Denisiuk, Manuel Castro Menéndez, Sonsoles Pastor, Ane Larrazábal, Beatriz Olías-López, Patricia Amaya-Espinosa, Juan Boluda-Mengod, David González-Martín, Daniel López-Dorado, Juan Carlos Borrás-Cebrián, Carles Martínez-Pérez, Patricio Andrés Freile Pazmiño, Pablo Calavia-Calé, Miguel Ángel Suárez-Suárez, Lucía Lanuza-Lagunilla, Antonio García Arias, Julián Cabria-Fernández, Javier García-Coiradas, José Valle-Cruz, Jaime Sánchez Del Saz, Jesús Mora-Fernández, Pedro Lalueza-Andreu, César Bonome-Roel, María Ángeles Cano-Leira, Antonio Benjumea Carrasco, Ana López-de Pariza, Alexis Fernández-Juan, Carmen Sevillano-de la Puente, Miren Juldain-Mondragón, Jorge Guadilla Arsuaga, Eladio Saura-Sánchez, Sandra Giménez-Ibáñez, Plácido Sánchez-Gómez, F Javier Ricón-Recarey, Elena M García García, Francisco Cuadrado-Abajo, María Isabel Pérez-Núñez, Pedro Del Pozo-Manrique, Francisco Manuel García Navas-García, Ester García-Paredero, Ainhoa Guijarro-Valtueña, Teresa Beteta Robles, Inés Navas-Pernía, Ignasi De Villasante-Jirón, Teresa Serra Porta, Carmen Carrasco Becerra, Víctor Otero-Naveiro, Silvia Pena Paz, Inés Fernández-Billón Castrillo, Fátima Fernández-Dorado, Amaia Martínez-Menduiña, Víctor Vaquerizo-García, Antonio Murcia-Asensio, Elena Galián-Muñoz, Carmelo Marín-Martínez, Adrián Muñoz-Vicente, Nuria Plaza-Salazar, Carla Gámez-Asunción, Jennifer Benito-Santamaría, Paula Salgado-Tarrida, Oriol Prats-Puente, Alejandro Cuenca-Copete, Blas González-Montero, Luis Alejandro Giraldo-Vegas, Juan Mingo-Robinet, Ricardo Briso-Montiano, Amaya Barbería-Biurrun, Emma Escudero-Martínez, Laura Chouza-Montero, María Naharro-Tobío, Alfons Gasset-Teixidor, Andrea Domínguez-Ibarrola, J M Peñalver, Jorge Serrano-Sanz, Adrián Roche-Albero, Carlos Martín-Hernández, María Macho-Mier, José Carlos Saló-Cuenca, Jordi Espona Roselló, Guillermo Criado-Albillos, Hugo Gabriel Cabello-Benavides, David Alonso Nestar, Jerónimo González-Bernal, Josefa González-Santos, Jorge Cunchillos-Pascual, Jorge Martínez-Íñiguez Blasco, José Manuel Bogallo-Dorado, Alicia Ramírez-Roldán, Juan Ramón Cano-Porras, Fernando Marqués-López, Santos Martínez-Díaz, Pablo I Slullitel, Guido S Carabelli, Ignacio Astore, Bruno Rafael Boietti, Julio César Córdova-Peralta, Carlos Hernández-Pascual, Alfredo Rodríguez-Gangoso, Iván Dot-Pascuet, Ana Piñeiro-Borrero, José María Pérez-Sánchez, Alfonso Mandía-Martínez, Julio De Caso-Rodríguez, Jordi Martín-Marcuello, Miguel Benito-Mateo, Oiane Alda-Gastiain, Irene Corcuera-Elosegui, María Rosa González-Panisello, Nicolás Elizalde Pérez-Salazar, María De Sande-Díaz","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00886-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-025-00886-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty (FH-PPF) represent a severe complication, especially in elderly patients with compromised health. Traditionally, revision arthroplasty is recommended for B2-B3 FH-PPF, yet internal fixation has emerged as a debated alternative in select patients. The hypothesis was that fixation, in selected patients with B2-B3 FH-PPF, decreases mortality and surgical complication rates with the same functional outcomes as revision arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PIPPAS is a multicenter prospective observational study. This cohort substudy includes 485 patients across 57 hospitals with B2-B3 FH-PPF between January 2021 and May 2023. Management strategy, revision or fixation, was at the attending surgeon's discretion. Propensity score matching, controlled for age, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (a-CCI), prefracture mobility, Pfeiffer scale, and ASA score, was done. Mortality risk factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 485 patients, 164 received fixation, and 321 underwent revision. Fixation patients were older (88 versus 82 years, p < 0.001) and frailer. Fixation was associated with shorter hospital stay (13 versus 15 days, p = 0.003) but higher 1-year mortality (25% versus 14.3%, p = 0.04). There were no differences in medical or surgical complications (p = 0.83 and p = 0.36) at any time, but dislocation rate was higher in the revision group (p = 0.001). The 1-year mortality rate in patients with no weight-bearing restrictions was higher for the revision group (p = 0.01). The propensity score matching showed higher 1-year mortality rate in the fixation group but no differences in functional outcomes, complications, or up to 6-months mortality. In the multivariate analysis a-CCI, cognitive impairment, B3 fractures, and prefracture independent walking impairment were independent mortality risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revision arthroplasty showed less 1-year mortality rate and weight-bearing restrictions than fixation. However, frail patients with B2-B3 FH-PPF managed with fixation allowing full weight-bearing showed a lower 1-year mortality rate. Fixation in B2-B3 FH-PPF is a treatment option in frail patients, while aiming for stable constructions allowing full weight-bearing.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence ii: </strong>prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04663893).</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12722616/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Lumbar fusion is a common intervention for degenerative spinal conditions, with robotic-assisted techniques offering improved precision. However, evidence comparing robotic and conventional fusion in frail older adults is limited. This study evaluated short-term postoperative outcomes in this high-risk population.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from frail adults aged ≥ 60 years who underwent single-level lumbar fusion between 2016 and 2020 using the National Readmission Database. Frailty was assessed with the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Outcomes-including in-hospital mortality, complications, hospital charges, and length of stay (LOS)-were compared between robotic and conventional fusion groups using propensity score matching (PSM). Key covariates used in the matching process included age and severe liver disease. Logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Among 29,938 patients identified, 20,227 met inclusion criteria, and 3135 patients remained after PSM. Robotic surgery was associated with significantly higher hospital charges compared with the conventional approach (mean 203,700 USD versus 151,200 USD; β = 52.51, 95% CI 26.41, 78.60; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in in-hospital mortality (0.4% for both; OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.14, 7.79, p = 0.978), LOS (5.3 versus 5.6 days; β = -0.36, p = 0.263), or complication rates between groups.
Conclusions: Robotic-assisted lumbar fusion in frail older adults leads to higher total hospital charges without short-term clinical benefit compared with conventional techniques. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and justify the use of robotic surgery in this population.
Level of evidence: 3:
背景:腰椎融合术是脊柱退行性疾病的常见干预,机器人辅助技术提高了精确度。然而,在虚弱的老年人中比较机器人和传统融合的证据是有限的。本研究评估了这一高危人群的短期术后结果。材料和方法:本回顾性研究分析了2016年至2020年期间接受单节段腰椎融合术的年龄≥60岁体弱成年人的数据,这些数据来自国家再入院数据库。虚弱程度采用医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)进行评估。结果——包括住院死亡率、并发症、住院费用和住院时间(LOS)——使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)在机器人和传统融合组之间进行比较。在匹配过程中使用的关键协变量包括年龄和严重肝病。Logistic回归提供校正优势比(aOR)和95%可信区间(CI)。结果:在确定的29,938例患者中,20,227例符合纳入标准,3135例患者在PSM后仍然存在。与传统方法相比,机器人手术的住院费用明显更高(平均203,700美元对151,200美元;β = 52.51, 95% CI 26.41, 78.60; p)结论:与传统技术相比,机器人辅助腰椎融合术治疗体弱老年人的总住院费用更高,且无短期临床效益。需要进一步的研究来评估长期结果,并证明在这一人群中使用机器人手术的合理性。证据等级:3;
{"title":"Robotic versus conventional single-level lumbar fusion in frail older adults: analysis of the National Readmission Database, 2016-2020.","authors":"Po-Wen Chen, Tsung-Hsi Yang, Tao-Chieh Yang, Se-Yi Chen","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00890-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10195-025-00890-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar fusion is a common intervention for degenerative spinal conditions, with robotic-assisted techniques offering improved precision. However, evidence comparing robotic and conventional fusion in frail older adults is limited. This study evaluated short-term postoperative outcomes in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed data from frail adults aged ≥ 60 years who underwent single-level lumbar fusion between 2016 and 2020 using the National Readmission Database. Frailty was assessed with the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Outcomes-including in-hospital mortality, complications, hospital charges, and length of stay (LOS)-were compared between robotic and conventional fusion groups using propensity score matching (PSM). Key covariates used in the matching process included age and severe liver disease. Logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 29,938 patients identified, 20,227 met inclusion criteria, and 3135 patients remained after PSM. Robotic surgery was associated with significantly higher hospital charges compared with the conventional approach (mean 203,700 USD versus 151,200 USD; β = 52.51, 95% CI 26.41, 78.60; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in in-hospital mortality (0.4% for both; OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.14, 7.79, p = 0.978), LOS (5.3 versus 5.6 days; β = -0.36, p = 0.263), or complication rates between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-assisted lumbar fusion in frail older adults leads to higher total hospital charges without short-term clinical benefit compared with conventional techniques. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and justify the use of robotic surgery in this population.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12717337/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}