Rocio B. Quinonez DMD, MS, MPH, Cheryl A. Vamos PhD, MPH, Renice Obure MPH, Dilek Çankaya Uyan DDS, PhD, Ashley Tittemore MA, Cristiano Susin DDS, PhD, Angela Broome DDS, MS, Ibrahim Duqum DDS, MS, Marta L. Musskopf DDS, MSD, PhD, Keith Phillips DDS, Denice Stewart DDS, MHSA, Janet M. Guthmiller DDS, PhD
{"title":"利用实施科学评估口腔医学教育中可归属专业活动的纵向评估。","authors":"Rocio B. Quinonez DMD, MS, MPH, Cheryl A. Vamos PhD, MPH, Renice Obure MPH, Dilek Çankaya Uyan DDS, PhD, Ashley Tittemore MA, Cristiano Susin DDS, PhD, Angela Broome DDS, MS, Ibrahim Duqum DDS, MS, Marta L. Musskopf DDS, MSD, PhD, Keith Phillips DDS, Denice Stewart DDS, MHSA, Janet M. Guthmiller DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the implementation of a longitudinal assessment framework utilizing entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in dental education during the initial 2-year implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was utilized to evaluate contextual factors influencing implementation across the following domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process. Purposive sampling was used to ascertain a diverse pool of participants and various perspectives. Inclusion criteria required engagement for >12 months at the time of the study. A semi-structured interview guide was developed. Two focus groups of faculty and staff and four individual leadership interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams, transcribed, and thematic analyses were performed using MAXQDA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen participants described innovation design details, adaptability, complexity, and relative advantage. The contextual fabric of the setting was evaluated, highlighting the influence of the pandemic, institutional culture, structural shifts, and the pivotal role played by champions. The implementation process was investigated with a focus on training, engagement, access to information, faculty capability, motivation, learner experience, and continual assessment of implementation processes. Data suggests the framework was multi-dimensional, evolving, and learner-centered. It facilitated early identification of learners requiring support, provided comprehensive information guiding entrustment and practice readiness decisions and demonstrated preliminary evidence of effectiveness of the innovation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Engaging in longitudinal assessment using EPAs is multifaceted and influenced by implementation context and intrinsic motivation prevalent among faculty members. The study identifies areas for refinement in support of continuous quality improvement and implementation of this innovative assessment framework in dental education, including technological support, training, and ongoing alignment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"1709-1719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using implementation science to evaluate longitudinal assessment of entrustable professional activities in dental education\",\"authors\":\"Rocio B. Quinonez DMD, MS, MPH, Cheryl A. Vamos PhD, MPH, Renice Obure MPH, Dilek Çankaya Uyan DDS, PhD, Ashley Tittemore MA, Cristiano Susin DDS, PhD, Angela Broome DDS, MS, Ibrahim Duqum DDS, MS, Marta L. Musskopf DDS, MSD, PhD, Keith Phillips DDS, Denice Stewart DDS, MHSA, Janet M. Guthmiller DDS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jdd.13780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the implementation of a longitudinal assessment framework utilizing entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in dental education during the initial 2-year implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was utilized to evaluate contextual factors influencing implementation across the following domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process. Purposive sampling was used to ascertain a diverse pool of participants and various perspectives. Inclusion criteria required engagement for >12 months at the time of the study. A semi-structured interview guide was developed. Two focus groups of faculty and staff and four individual leadership interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams, transcribed, and thematic analyses were performed using MAXQDA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifteen participants described innovation design details, adaptability, complexity, and relative advantage. The contextual fabric of the setting was evaluated, highlighting the influence of the pandemic, institutional culture, structural shifts, and the pivotal role played by champions. The implementation process was investigated with a focus on training, engagement, access to information, faculty capability, motivation, learner experience, and continual assessment of implementation processes. Data suggests the framework was multi-dimensional, evolving, and learner-centered. It facilitated early identification of learners requiring support, provided comprehensive information guiding entrustment and practice readiness decisions and demonstrated preliminary evidence of effectiveness of the innovation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Engaging in longitudinal assessment using EPAs is multifaceted and influenced by implementation context and intrinsic motivation prevalent among faculty members. The study identifies areas for refinement in support of continuous quality improvement and implementation of this innovative assessment framework in dental education, including technological support, training, and ongoing alignment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\"88 12\",\"pages\":\"1709-1719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jdd.13780\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jdd.13780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using implementation science to evaluate longitudinal assessment of entrustable professional activities in dental education
Purpose
To evaluate the implementation of a longitudinal assessment framework utilizing entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in dental education during the initial 2-year implementation.
Method
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was utilized to evaluate contextual factors influencing implementation across the following domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process. Purposive sampling was used to ascertain a diverse pool of participants and various perspectives. Inclusion criteria required engagement for >12 months at the time of the study. A semi-structured interview guide was developed. Two focus groups of faculty and staff and four individual leadership interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams, transcribed, and thematic analyses were performed using MAXQDA.
Results
Fifteen participants described innovation design details, adaptability, complexity, and relative advantage. The contextual fabric of the setting was evaluated, highlighting the influence of the pandemic, institutional culture, structural shifts, and the pivotal role played by champions. The implementation process was investigated with a focus on training, engagement, access to information, faculty capability, motivation, learner experience, and continual assessment of implementation processes. Data suggests the framework was multi-dimensional, evolving, and learner-centered. It facilitated early identification of learners requiring support, provided comprehensive information guiding entrustment and practice readiness decisions and demonstrated preliminary evidence of effectiveness of the innovation.
Conclusion
Engaging in longitudinal assessment using EPAs is multifaceted and influenced by implementation context and intrinsic motivation prevalent among faculty members. The study identifies areas for refinement in support of continuous quality improvement and implementation of this innovative assessment framework in dental education, including technological support, training, and ongoing alignment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.