利用实施科学评估口腔医学教育中可归属专业活动的纵向评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1002/jdd.13780
Rocio B. Quinonez DMD, MS, MPH, Cheryl A. Vamos PhD, MPH, Renice Obure MPH, Dilek Çankaya Uyan DDS, PhD, Ashley Tittemore MA, Cristiano Susin DDS, PhD, Angela Broome DDS, MS, Ibrahim Duqum DDS, MS, Marta L. Musskopf DDS, MSD, PhD, Keith Phillips DDS, Denice Stewart DDS, MHSA, Janet M. Guthmiller DDS, PhD
{"title":"利用实施科学评估口腔医学教育中可归属专业活动的纵向评估。","authors":"Rocio B. Quinonez DMD, MS, MPH,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Vamos PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Renice Obure MPH,&nbsp;Dilek Çankaya Uyan DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Ashley Tittemore MA,&nbsp;Cristiano Susin DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Angela Broome DDS, MS,&nbsp;Ibrahim Duqum DDS, MS,&nbsp;Marta L. Musskopf DDS, MSD, PhD,&nbsp;Keith Phillips DDS,&nbsp;Denice Stewart DDS, MHSA,&nbsp;Janet M. Guthmiller DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the implementation of a longitudinal assessment framework utilizing entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in dental education during the initial 2-year implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was utilized to evaluate contextual factors influencing implementation across the following domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process. Purposive sampling was used to ascertain a diverse pool of participants and various perspectives. Inclusion criteria required engagement for &gt;12 months at the time of the study. A semi-structured interview guide was developed. Two focus groups of faculty and staff and four individual leadership interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams, transcribed, and thematic analyses were performed using MAXQDA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen participants described innovation design details, adaptability, complexity, and relative advantage. The contextual fabric of the setting was evaluated, highlighting the influence of the pandemic, institutional culture, structural shifts, and the pivotal role played by champions. The implementation process was investigated with a focus on training, engagement, access to information, faculty capability, motivation, learner experience, and continual assessment of implementation processes. Data suggests the framework was multi-dimensional, evolving, and learner-centered. It facilitated early identification of learners requiring support, provided comprehensive information guiding entrustment and practice readiness decisions and demonstrated preliminary evidence of effectiveness of the innovation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Engaging in longitudinal assessment using EPAs is multifaceted and influenced by implementation context and intrinsic motivation prevalent among faculty members. The study identifies areas for refinement in support of continuous quality improvement and implementation of this innovative assessment framework in dental education, including technological support, training, and ongoing alignment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"1709-1719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using implementation science to evaluate longitudinal assessment of entrustable professional activities in dental education\",\"authors\":\"Rocio B. Quinonez DMD, MS, MPH,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Vamos PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Renice Obure MPH,&nbsp;Dilek Çankaya Uyan DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Ashley Tittemore MA,&nbsp;Cristiano Susin DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Angela Broome DDS, MS,&nbsp;Ibrahim Duqum DDS, MS,&nbsp;Marta L. Musskopf DDS, MSD, PhD,&nbsp;Keith Phillips DDS,&nbsp;Denice Stewart DDS, MHSA,&nbsp;Janet M. Guthmiller DDS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jdd.13780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the implementation of a longitudinal assessment framework utilizing entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in dental education during the initial 2-year implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was utilized to evaluate contextual factors influencing implementation across the following domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process. Purposive sampling was used to ascertain a diverse pool of participants and various perspectives. Inclusion criteria required engagement for &gt;12 months at the time of the study. A semi-structured interview guide was developed. Two focus groups of faculty and staff and four individual leadership interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams, transcribed, and thematic analyses were performed using MAXQDA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifteen participants described innovation design details, adaptability, complexity, and relative advantage. The contextual fabric of the setting was evaluated, highlighting the influence of the pandemic, institutional culture, structural shifts, and the pivotal role played by champions. The implementation process was investigated with a focus on training, engagement, access to information, faculty capability, motivation, learner experience, and continual assessment of implementation processes. Data suggests the framework was multi-dimensional, evolving, and learner-centered. It facilitated early identification of learners requiring support, provided comprehensive information guiding entrustment and practice readiness decisions and demonstrated preliminary evidence of effectiveness of the innovation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Engaging in longitudinal assessment using EPAs is multifaceted and influenced by implementation context and intrinsic motivation prevalent among faculty members. The study identifies areas for refinement in support of continuous quality improvement and implementation of this innovative assessment framework in dental education, including technological support, training, and ongoing alignment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\"88 12\",\"pages\":\"1709-1719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jdd.13780\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jdd.13780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估利用可委托专业活动(EPAs)的纵向评估框架在口腔医学教育中最初两年的实施情况:方法:利用 "实施研究综合框架 "来评估影响以下领域实施的背景因素:创新、外部环境、内部环境、个人和过程。采用有目的的抽样,以确定参与者的多样性和各种观点。纳入标准要求参与研究的时间大于 12 个月。制定了半结构化访谈指南。通过微软团队(Microsoft Teams)进行了两个教职员工焦点小组和四个领导个人访谈,并进行了誊写,然后使用 MAXQDA 进行了主题分析:结果:15 位参与者描述了创新设计的细节、适应性、复杂性和相对优势。对环境结构进行了评估,强调了大流行病、机构文化、结构转变的影响,以及倡导者所发挥的关键作用。对实施过程进行了调查,重点是培训、参与、信息获取、教师能力、动机、学习者体验以及对实施过程的持续评估。数据表明,该框架是多维的、不断发展的、以学习者为中心的。它有助于及早识别需要支持的学习者,提供指导委托和实践准备决策的综合信息,并初步证明了创新的有效性:结论:使用 EPA 参与纵向评估是多方面的,受到实施环境和教师内在动机的影响。这项研究指出了在口腔医学教育中支持持续质量改进和实施这一创新评估框架的改进领域,包括技术支持、培训和持续调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using implementation science to evaluate longitudinal assessment of entrustable professional activities in dental education

Purpose

To evaluate the implementation of a longitudinal assessment framework utilizing entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in dental education during the initial 2-year implementation.

Method

The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was utilized to evaluate contextual factors influencing implementation across the following domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process. Purposive sampling was used to ascertain a diverse pool of participants and various perspectives. Inclusion criteria required engagement for >12 months at the time of the study. A semi-structured interview guide was developed. Two focus groups of faculty and staff and four individual leadership interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams, transcribed, and thematic analyses were performed using MAXQDA.

Results

Fifteen participants described innovation design details, adaptability, complexity, and relative advantage. The contextual fabric of the setting was evaluated, highlighting the influence of the pandemic, institutional culture, structural shifts, and the pivotal role played by champions. The implementation process was investigated with a focus on training, engagement, access to information, faculty capability, motivation, learner experience, and continual assessment of implementation processes. Data suggests the framework was multi-dimensional, evolving, and learner-centered. It facilitated early identification of learners requiring support, provided comprehensive information guiding entrustment and practice readiness decisions and demonstrated preliminary evidence of effectiveness of the innovation.

Conclusion

Engaging in longitudinal assessment using EPAs is multifaceted and influenced by implementation context and intrinsic motivation prevalent among faculty members. The study identifies areas for refinement in support of continuous quality improvement and implementation of this innovative assessment framework in dental education, including technological support, training, and ongoing alignment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Integrating Generative AI in Case-Based Collaborative Learning: Student's Perceptions. Interventions to Reduce Food and Nutrition Insecurity Among Dental Students. Assessing AI-Enhanced Learning in Bone Loss Detection among Dental Students. A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non-Disposable Syringes for Dental Training. Innovative Tobacco Cessation Strategies in Dental Education: Bridging Didactic and Clinical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1