护理中的低价值和高价值护理建议:临床实践指南的系统评估。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Scholarship Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/jnu.13029
Wilmieke Bahlman-van Ooijen, Jeltje Giesen, Annick Bakker-Jacobs, Hester Vermeulen, Getty Huisman-de Waal
{"title":"护理中的低价值和高价值护理建议:临床实践指南的系统评估。","authors":"Wilmieke Bahlman-van Ooijen, Jeltje Giesen, Annick Bakker-Jacobs, Hester Vermeulen, Getty Huisman-de Waal","doi":"10.1111/jnu.13029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization defines quality of care as providing effective, evidence-based care, and avoiding harm. Low-value care provides little or no benefit to the patient, causes harm, and wastes limited resources. In 2017, shortly after the start of the International Choosing Wisely campaign, the first Dutch nursing \"Do-not-do\" list was published and has become a widely used practical tool for nurses working in daily practice. However, over the last years new guidelines are published. Therefore, an update of the list is necessary with an addition of high-value care recommendations as alternative care practices for low-value care.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>In this study, a combination of designs was used. First, we searched Dutch clinical practice guidelines for low-value or high-value care recommendations. All nursing care recommendations were assessed and specified to several healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care, and mental health care. Second, a prioritization among nurses regarding low-value care recommendations was done by a cross-sectional survey for each healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 66 low-value care recommendations were found, for example, \"avoid unnecessary layers under the patient at risk of pressure ulcers\" and \"never flush the bladder to prevent urinary tract infection.\" Furthermore, 414 high-value care recommendations were selected, such as \"use the Barthel Index to assess and to evaluate the degree of ADL independence\" and \"application of cold therapy may be considered for oncological patients with pain.\" In total, 539 nurses from all healthcare sectors prioritized the low-value care recommendations, resulting in a top five low-value care practices per healthcare sector. The top five low-value care recommendations differed per healthcare sector, although \"do not use physical restraints in case of a delirium\" was prioritized by four out of five sectors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessing low-value and high-value care recommendations for nurses will help and inspire nurses to deliver fundamental care for their patients. These initiatives regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous quality improvement based on evidence. This is also essential to meeting the current challenges of the healthcare delivery system.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This paper provides an update of low-value care recommendations for nurses based on Dutch guidelines from 2017 to 2023, specified to five healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care and mental health care, with an accompanying prioritization of these low-value care recommendations to facilitate de-implementation. This paper provides a first overview of high-value care recommendations to reflect on and create alternative care practices for low-value care. The recommendations regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous improvement of appropriateness based on evidence, finally leading to better quality of care and improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Wilmieke Bahlman-van Ooijen, Jeltje Giesen, Annick Bakker-Jacobs, Hester Vermeulen, Getty Huisman-de Waal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnu.13029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization defines quality of care as providing effective, evidence-based care, and avoiding harm. Low-value care provides little or no benefit to the patient, causes harm, and wastes limited resources. In 2017, shortly after the start of the International Choosing Wisely campaign, the first Dutch nursing \\\"Do-not-do\\\" list was published and has become a widely used practical tool for nurses working in daily practice. However, over the last years new guidelines are published. Therefore, an update of the list is necessary with an addition of high-value care recommendations as alternative care practices for low-value care.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>In this study, a combination of designs was used. First, we searched Dutch clinical practice guidelines for low-value or high-value care recommendations. All nursing care recommendations were assessed and specified to several healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care, and mental health care. Second, a prioritization among nurses regarding low-value care recommendations was done by a cross-sectional survey for each healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 66 low-value care recommendations were found, for example, \\\"avoid unnecessary layers under the patient at risk of pressure ulcers\\\" and \\\"never flush the bladder to prevent urinary tract infection.\\\" Furthermore, 414 high-value care recommendations were selected, such as \\\"use the Barthel Index to assess and to evaluate the degree of ADL independence\\\" and \\\"application of cold therapy may be considered for oncological patients with pain.\\\" In total, 539 nurses from all healthcare sectors prioritized the low-value care recommendations, resulting in a top five low-value care practices per healthcare sector. The top five low-value care recommendations differed per healthcare sector, although \\\"do not use physical restraints in case of a delirium\\\" was prioritized by four out of five sectors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessing low-value and high-value care recommendations for nurses will help and inspire nurses to deliver fundamental care for their patients. These initiatives regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous quality improvement based on evidence. This is also essential to meeting the current challenges of the healthcare delivery system.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This paper provides an update of low-value care recommendations for nurses based on Dutch guidelines from 2017 to 2023, specified to five healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care and mental health care, with an accompanying prioritization of these low-value care recommendations to facilitate de-implementation. This paper provides a first overview of high-value care recommendations to reflect on and create alternative care practices for low-value care. The recommendations regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous improvement of appropriateness based on evidence, finally leading to better quality of care and improving patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.13029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.13029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:世界卫生组织对护理质量的定义是:提供有效的、以证据为基础的护理,并避免伤害。低价值护理对患者几乎没有益处,会造成伤害,并浪费有限的资源。2017 年,在国际明智选择运动开始后不久,第一份荷兰护理 "不做 "清单发布,并已成为护士在日常工作中广泛使用的实用工具。然而,最近几年又有新的指南发布。因此,有必要对该清单进行更新,增加高价值护理建议,作为低价值护理的替代护理措施:本研究采用了多种设计方法。首先,我们搜索了荷兰临床实践指南中的低价值或高价值护理建议。我们对所有护理建议进行了评估,并将其具体化到多个医疗保健部门,包括医院护理、地区护理、疗养院护理、残疾人护理和精神健康护理。其次,通过对各医疗部门进行横断面调查,在护士中对低价值护理建议进行优先排序:结果:总共发现了 66 项低价值护理建议,例如 "避免在有压疮风险的患者身下铺设不必要的垫层 "和 "绝不冲洗膀胱以预防尿路感染"。此外,还选出了 414 条高价值护理建议,如 "使用 Barthel 指数评估和评价 ADL 独立程度"、"肿瘤患者疼痛时可考虑应用冷疗法 "等。共有 539 名来自各医疗保健部门的护士对低价值护理建议进行了优先排序,从而得出了各医疗保健部门的五大低价值护理实践。虽然 "谵妄时不使用身体约束 "被五个医疗部门中的四个部门列为优先考虑事项,但每个医疗部门的前五名低价值护理建议并不相同:评估针对护士的低价值和高价值护理建议将有助于并激励护士为患者提供基础护理。这些有关低价值和高价值护理的倡议对于在证据的基础上形成持续改进质量的文化至关重要。这对于应对当前医疗保健服务体系的挑战也至关重要:本文根据 2017 年至 2023 年的荷兰指南,为护士提供了最新的低价值护理建议,具体到五个医疗保健领域,包括医院护理、地区护理、疗养院护理、残疾护理和心理健康护理,并同时对这些低价值护理建议进行了优先排序,以促进其取消实施。本文首先概述了高价值护理建议,以便对低价值护理进行反思并创建替代护理实践。有关低价值和高价值护理的建议对于形成一种以证据为基础不断改进适当性的文化至关重要,最终将提高护理质量并改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines.

Introduction: The World Health Organization defines quality of care as providing effective, evidence-based care, and avoiding harm. Low-value care provides little or no benefit to the patient, causes harm, and wastes limited resources. In 2017, shortly after the start of the International Choosing Wisely campaign, the first Dutch nursing "Do-not-do" list was published and has become a widely used practical tool for nurses working in daily practice. However, over the last years new guidelines are published. Therefore, an update of the list is necessary with an addition of high-value care recommendations as alternative care practices for low-value care.

Design/methods: In this study, a combination of designs was used. First, we searched Dutch clinical practice guidelines for low-value or high-value care recommendations. All nursing care recommendations were assessed and specified to several healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care, and mental health care. Second, a prioritization among nurses regarding low-value care recommendations was done by a cross-sectional survey for each healthcare sector.

Results: In total, 66 low-value care recommendations were found, for example, "avoid unnecessary layers under the patient at risk of pressure ulcers" and "never flush the bladder to prevent urinary tract infection." Furthermore, 414 high-value care recommendations were selected, such as "use the Barthel Index to assess and to evaluate the degree of ADL independence" and "application of cold therapy may be considered for oncological patients with pain." In total, 539 nurses from all healthcare sectors prioritized the low-value care recommendations, resulting in a top five low-value care practices per healthcare sector. The top five low-value care recommendations differed per healthcare sector, although "do not use physical restraints in case of a delirium" was prioritized by four out of five sectors.

Conclusions: Assessing low-value and high-value care recommendations for nurses will help and inspire nurses to deliver fundamental care for their patients. These initiatives regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous quality improvement based on evidence. This is also essential to meeting the current challenges of the healthcare delivery system.

Clinical relevance: This paper provides an update of low-value care recommendations for nurses based on Dutch guidelines from 2017 to 2023, specified to five healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care and mental health care, with an accompanying prioritization of these low-value care recommendations to facilitate de-implementation. This paper provides a first overview of high-value care recommendations to reflect on and create alternative care practices for low-value care. The recommendations regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous improvement of appropriateness based on evidence, finally leading to better quality of care and improving patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
期刊最新文献
Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Issue Information Missed nursing care: Expanding the research scope for a comprehensive understanding. Response to a Letter to the Editor on "The Role of Nurses' Adherence to Clinical Safety Guidelines in Linking Nurse Practice Environment to Missed Nursing Care". Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1