合成数据和以 ELSI 为重点的计算检查单--生物医学专业人员观点调查。

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000666
Jennifer K Wagner, Laura Y Cabrera, Sara Gerke, Daniel Susser
{"title":"合成数据和以 ELSI 为重点的计算检查单--生物医学专业人员观点调查。","authors":"Jennifer K Wagner, Laura Y Cabrera, Sara Gerke, Daniel Susser","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools are now proliferating in biomedical contexts, and there is no sign this will slow down any time soon. AI/ML and related technologies promise to improve scientific understanding of health and disease and have the potential to spur the development of innovative and effective diagnostics, treatments, cures, and medical technologies. Concerns about AI/ML are prominent, but attention to two specific aspects of AI/ML have so far received little research attention: synthetic data and computational checklists that might promote not only the reproducibility of AI/ML tools but also increased attention to ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of AI/ML tools. We administered a targeted survey to explore these two items among biomedical professionals in the United States. Our survey findings suggest that there is a gap in familiarity with both synthetic data and computational checklists among AI/ML users and developers and those in ethics-related positions who might be tasked with ensuring the proper use or oversight of AI/ML tools. The findings from this survey study underscore the need for additional ELSI research on synthetic data and computational checklists to inform escalating efforts, including the establishment of laws and policies, to ensure safe, effective, and ethical use of AI in health settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 11","pages":"e0000666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic data and ELSI-focused computational checklists-A survey of biomedical professionals' views.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer K Wagner, Laura Y Cabrera, Sara Gerke, Daniel Susser\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools are now proliferating in biomedical contexts, and there is no sign this will slow down any time soon. AI/ML and related technologies promise to improve scientific understanding of health and disease and have the potential to spur the development of innovative and effective diagnostics, treatments, cures, and medical technologies. Concerns about AI/ML are prominent, but attention to two specific aspects of AI/ML have so far received little research attention: synthetic data and computational checklists that might promote not only the reproducibility of AI/ML tools but also increased attention to ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of AI/ML tools. We administered a targeted survey to explore these two items among biomedical professionals in the United States. Our survey findings suggest that there is a gap in familiarity with both synthetic data and computational checklists among AI/ML users and developers and those in ethics-related positions who might be tasked with ensuring the proper use or oversight of AI/ML tools. The findings from this survey study underscore the need for additional ELSI research on synthetic data and computational checklists to inform escalating efforts, including the establishment of laws and policies, to ensure safe, effective, and ethical use of AI in health settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"3 11\",\"pages\":\"e0000666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)工具目前正在生物医学领域大量使用,而且没有迹象表明这一趋势会很快放缓。人工智能/ML 和相关技术有望提高人们对健康和疾病的科学认识,并有可能促进创新和有效诊断、治疗、治愈和医疗技术的发展。人们对人工智能/人工智能的关注十分突出,但迄今为止,对人工智能/人工智能两个具体方面的关注却很少引起研究人员的注意:合成数据和计算清单,这不仅可以提高人工智能/人工智能工具的可重复性,还可以提高人们对人工智能/人工智能工具的伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)的关注。我们在美国的生物医学专业人士中开展了一项有针对性的调查,以探讨这两个问题。我们的调查结果表明,人工智能/ML 用户和开发人员以及可能负责确保正确使用或监督人工智能/ML 工具的伦理相关岗位人员对合成数据和计算清单的熟悉程度存在差距。这项调查研究的结果突出表明,有必要对合成数据和计算检查单进行更多的 ELSI 研究,以便为不断升级的工作提供信息,包括制定法律和政策,确保在医疗环境中安全、有效、合乎道德地使用人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synthetic data and ELSI-focused computational checklists-A survey of biomedical professionals' views.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools are now proliferating in biomedical contexts, and there is no sign this will slow down any time soon. AI/ML and related technologies promise to improve scientific understanding of health and disease and have the potential to spur the development of innovative and effective diagnostics, treatments, cures, and medical technologies. Concerns about AI/ML are prominent, but attention to two specific aspects of AI/ML have so far received little research attention: synthetic data and computational checklists that might promote not only the reproducibility of AI/ML tools but also increased attention to ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of AI/ML tools. We administered a targeted survey to explore these two items among biomedical professionals in the United States. Our survey findings suggest that there is a gap in familiarity with both synthetic data and computational checklists among AI/ML users and developers and those in ethics-related positions who might be tasked with ensuring the proper use or oversight of AI/ML tools. The findings from this survey study underscore the need for additional ELSI research on synthetic data and computational checklists to inform escalating efforts, including the establishment of laws and policies, to ensure safe, effective, and ethical use of AI in health settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunities to design better computer vison-assisted food diaries to support individuals and experts in dietary assessment: An observation and interview study with nutrition experts. Deep learning-based screening for locomotive syndrome using single-camera walking video: Development and validation study. A recurrent neural network and parallel hidden Markov model algorithm to segment and detect heart murmurs in phonocardiograms. On-site electronic consent in pediatrics using generic Informed Consent Service (gICS): Creating a specialized setup and collecting consent data. A feature-based qualitative assessment of smoking cessation mobile applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1