脑膜中动脉栓塞治疗慢性硬膜下血肿。

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2409845
David Fiorella, Stephen J Monteith, Ricardo Hanel, Benjamin Atchie, SoHyun Boo, Ryan A McTaggart, Alois Zauner, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Charlotte Barbier, Ronald Benitez, Laurent Spelle, Laurent Pierot, Joshua A Hirsch, Michael Froehler, Adam S Arthur
{"title":"脑膜中动脉栓塞治疗慢性硬膜下血肿。","authors":"David Fiorella, Stephen J Monteith, Ricardo Hanel, Benjamin Atchie, SoHyun Boo, Ryan A McTaggart, Alois Zauner, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Charlotte Barbier, Ronald Benitez, Laurent Spelle, Laurent Pierot, Joshua A Hirsch, Michael Froehler, Adam S Arthur","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2409845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients receiving standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma have a high risk of treatment failure. The effect of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization on the risk of treatment failure in this population remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma to undergo middle meningeal artery embolization as an adjunct to standard treatment (embolization group) or to receive standard treatment alone (control group). Either surgical or nonsurgical standard treatment had been chosen for each patient before randomization. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of the following events: recurrent or residual chronic subdural hematoma (measuring >10 mm) at 180 days; reoperation or surgical rescue within 180 days; or major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from neurologic causes within 180 days. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major disabling stroke or death from any cause within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 310 enrolled patients, 149 were randomly assigned to the embolization group and 161 to the control group; 189 patients were to receive surgical standard treatment and 121 nonsurgical standard treatment. The mean age of the patients was 73 years, and 70% were men. In the primary efficacy analysis, a primary-outcome event occurred in 19 of 120 patients (16%) in the embolization group, as compared with 47 of 129 patients (36%) in the control group (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.66; P = 0.001). In the primary safety analysis, 4 of 144 patients (3%) in the embolization group and 5 of 166 patients (3%) in the control group either had a major disabling stroke or died within 30 days. Through 180 days, 12 patients (8%) in the embolization group and 9 patients (5%) in the control group had died, with death from neurologic causes occurring in 1 patient (1%) in the embolization group and in 3 patients (2%) in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma, adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization resulted in a lower risk of treatment failure than standard treatment alone, without resulting in an increased incidence of disabling stroke or death in the short term. Further study of longer-term safety outcomes is warranted. (Funded by Balt USA; STEM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04410146.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma.\",\"authors\":\"David Fiorella, Stephen J Monteith, Ricardo Hanel, Benjamin Atchie, SoHyun Boo, Ryan A McTaggart, Alois Zauner, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Charlotte Barbier, Ronald Benitez, Laurent Spelle, Laurent Pierot, Joshua A Hirsch, Michael Froehler, Adam S Arthur\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2409845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients receiving standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma have a high risk of treatment failure. The effect of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization on the risk of treatment failure in this population remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma to undergo middle meningeal artery embolization as an adjunct to standard treatment (embolization group) or to receive standard treatment alone (control group). Either surgical or nonsurgical standard treatment had been chosen for each patient before randomization. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of the following events: recurrent or residual chronic subdural hematoma (measuring >10 mm) at 180 days; reoperation or surgical rescue within 180 days; or major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from neurologic causes within 180 days. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major disabling stroke or death from any cause within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 310 enrolled patients, 149 were randomly assigned to the embolization group and 161 to the control group; 189 patients were to receive surgical standard treatment and 121 nonsurgical standard treatment. The mean age of the patients was 73 years, and 70% were men. In the primary efficacy analysis, a primary-outcome event occurred in 19 of 120 patients (16%) in the embolization group, as compared with 47 of 129 patients (36%) in the control group (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.66; P = 0.001). In the primary safety analysis, 4 of 144 patients (3%) in the embolization group and 5 of 166 patients (3%) in the control group either had a major disabling stroke or died within 30 days. Through 180 days, 12 patients (8%) in the embolization group and 9 patients (5%) in the control group had died, with death from neurologic causes occurring in 1 patient (1%) in the embolization group and in 3 patients (2%) in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma, adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization resulted in a lower risk of treatment failure than standard treatment alone, without resulting in an increased incidence of disabling stroke or death in the short term. Further study of longer-term safety outcomes is warranted. (Funded by Balt USA; STEM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04410146.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2409845\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2409845","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受标准治疗的慢性硬膜下血肿患者治疗失败的风险很高。辅助性脑膜中动脉栓塞术对这一人群治疗失败风险的影响仍然未知:我们随机分配有症状的慢性硬膜下血肿患者接受脑膜中动脉栓塞术作为标准治疗的辅助治疗(栓塞组)或单独接受标准治疗(对照组)。随机分组前,每位患者都已选择了手术或非手术标准治疗。主要疗效结果是以下事件的综合结果:180天内复发或残留慢性硬膜下血肿(大小>10毫米);180天内再次手术或手术抢救;或180天内出现严重致残性中风、心肌梗死或因神经系统原因死亡。主要安全性结果是30天内出现严重致残性中风或因任何原因死亡的综合结果:在310名注册患者中,149人被随机分配到栓塞组,161人被随机分配到对照组;189名患者将接受手术标准治疗,121名患者将接受非手术标准治疗。患者的平均年龄为 73 岁,70% 为男性。在主要疗效分析中,栓塞组 120 例患者中有 19 例(16%)发生了主要结果事件,而对照组 129 例患者中有 47 例(36%)发生了主要结果事件(几率比 0.36;95% 置信区间 0.20 至 0.66;P = 0.001)。在主要安全性分析中,栓塞组 144 例患者中有 4 例(3%)和对照组 166 例患者中有 5 例(3%)在 30 天内发生严重致残中风或死亡。在180天内,栓塞组有12名患者(8%)死亡,对照组有9名患者(5%)死亡,其中栓塞组有1名患者(1%)死于神经系统疾病,对照组有3名患者(2%)死于神经系统疾病:结论:在有症状的慢性硬膜下血肿患者中,辅助性脑膜中动脉栓塞的治疗失败风险低于单纯的标准治疗,且不会在短期内增加致残性中风或死亡的发生率。有必要对长期安全性结果进行进一步研究。(由美国巴尔特公司资助;STEM ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT04410146)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma.

Background: Patients receiving standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma have a high risk of treatment failure. The effect of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization on the risk of treatment failure in this population remains unknown.

Methods: We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma to undergo middle meningeal artery embolization as an adjunct to standard treatment (embolization group) or to receive standard treatment alone (control group). Either surgical or nonsurgical standard treatment had been chosen for each patient before randomization. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of the following events: recurrent or residual chronic subdural hematoma (measuring >10 mm) at 180 days; reoperation or surgical rescue within 180 days; or major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from neurologic causes within 180 days. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major disabling stroke or death from any cause within 30 days.

Results: Among 310 enrolled patients, 149 were randomly assigned to the embolization group and 161 to the control group; 189 patients were to receive surgical standard treatment and 121 nonsurgical standard treatment. The mean age of the patients was 73 years, and 70% were men. In the primary efficacy analysis, a primary-outcome event occurred in 19 of 120 patients (16%) in the embolization group, as compared with 47 of 129 patients (36%) in the control group (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.66; P = 0.001). In the primary safety analysis, 4 of 144 patients (3%) in the embolization group and 5 of 166 patients (3%) in the control group either had a major disabling stroke or died within 30 days. Through 180 days, 12 patients (8%) in the embolization group and 9 patients (5%) in the control group had died, with death from neurologic causes occurring in 1 patient (1%) in the embolization group and in 3 patients (2%) in the control group.

Conclusions: Among patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma, adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization resulted in a lower risk of treatment failure than standard treatment alone, without resulting in an increased incidence of disabling stroke or death in the short term. Further study of longer-term safety outcomes is warranted. (Funded by Balt USA; STEM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04410146.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Eiffel-by-Night Sign. Invisible Deaths - Mortality among People Experiencing Homelessness. Mind the Sentinel - Applying Patient-Safety Paradigms to Clinician Well-Being. Saint Didacus, Fetal Death, and the Problem of Dual Loyalty. Diagnostic Complexity in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Thrombotic Significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1