与单腿纵跳相比,单腿水平跳更适合评估髌骨股骨痛患者的下肢功能。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.11.008
Hang Pan , Shengxing Fu , Yulin Zhou , Ting Long , Hanjun Li , Huijuan Shi
{"title":"与单腿纵跳相比,单腿水平跳更适合评估髌骨股骨痛患者的下肢功能。","authors":"Hang Pan ,&nbsp;Shengxing Fu ,&nbsp;Yulin Zhou ,&nbsp;Ting Long ,&nbsp;Hanjun Li ,&nbsp;Huijuan Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The single-leg vertical jump (SLVJ) and single-leg horizontal jump (SLHJ) are commonly used assessments for individuals with lower limb injuries. Despite previous studies comparing these tasks across various individuals, their comparative effectiveness in evaluating lower limb function in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and any potential sex differences in these functional tests remain uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine which jump task is more suitable for functional assessment in PFP patients by comparing the differences in jump performance and biomechanical variables between PFP patients and healthy individuals during the SLVJ and SLHJ. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine whether the more suitable functional assessment for male and female PFP patients is consistent.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 24 PFP patients (15 males, 9 females) and 17 healthy individuals (9 males, 8 females) were recruited. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected during the propulsion and landing phases of the SLVJ and SLHJ. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare each dependent variable between groups (PFP vs. healthy controls) and sex (male vs. female).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both male and female PFP groups presented a reduced jump distance than the control group in the SLHJ <em>(p</em> = 0.002), but no significant difference was detected in the SLVJ. Both male and female PFP groups displayed increased hip work (<em>p</em> = 0.005) and contribution (<em>p</em> = 0.009) and reduced knee work contribution (<em>p</em> = 0.034) during the propulsion phase of the SLHJ compared to the control group. Moreover, female participants of PFP and control groups performed shorter jump distances (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001) and had less knee work (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) during the propulsion phase of vertical and horizontal jumps than males.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Single-leg horizontal jump is more suitable for assessing lower limb function in PFP patients, characterized by reduced knee work contribution impacting jump performance, and this applies to both male and female PFP patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"115 ","pages":"Pages 94-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-leg horizontal jump is more suitable for assessing lower limb function compared to single-leg vertical jump in patellofemoral pain patients\",\"authors\":\"Hang Pan ,&nbsp;Shengxing Fu ,&nbsp;Yulin Zhou ,&nbsp;Ting Long ,&nbsp;Hanjun Li ,&nbsp;Huijuan Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The single-leg vertical jump (SLVJ) and single-leg horizontal jump (SLHJ) are commonly used assessments for individuals with lower limb injuries. Despite previous studies comparing these tasks across various individuals, their comparative effectiveness in evaluating lower limb function in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and any potential sex differences in these functional tests remain uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine which jump task is more suitable for functional assessment in PFP patients by comparing the differences in jump performance and biomechanical variables between PFP patients and healthy individuals during the SLVJ and SLHJ. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine whether the more suitable functional assessment for male and female PFP patients is consistent.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 24 PFP patients (15 males, 9 females) and 17 healthy individuals (9 males, 8 females) were recruited. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected during the propulsion and landing phases of the SLVJ and SLHJ. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare each dependent variable between groups (PFP vs. healthy controls) and sex (male vs. female).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both male and female PFP groups presented a reduced jump distance than the control group in the SLHJ <em>(p</em> = 0.002), but no significant difference was detected in the SLVJ. Both male and female PFP groups displayed increased hip work (<em>p</em> = 0.005) and contribution (<em>p</em> = 0.009) and reduced knee work contribution (<em>p</em> = 0.034) during the propulsion phase of the SLHJ compared to the control group. Moreover, female participants of PFP and control groups performed shorter jump distances (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001) and had less knee work (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) during the propulsion phase of vertical and horizontal jumps than males.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Single-leg horizontal jump is more suitable for assessing lower limb function in PFP patients, characterized by reduced knee work contribution impacting jump performance, and this applies to both male and female PFP patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 94-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006787\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:单腿立定跳远(SLVJ)和单腿水平跳远(SLHJ)是评估下肢损伤患者的常用方法。尽管之前有研究对不同个体进行了这些任务的比较,但它们在评估髌骨股骨痛(PFP)患者下肢功能方面的比较效果以及这些功能测试的潜在性别差异仍不确定:本研究的目的是通过比较 PFP 患者和健康人在 SLVJ 和 SLHJ 中的跳跃表现和生物力学变量差异,确定哪种跳跃任务更适合用于 PFP 患者的功能评估。此外,该研究还旨在确定男性和女性 PFP 患者更适合的功能评估是否一致:方法:共招募了 24 名 PFP 患者(15 名男性,9 名女性)和 17 名健康人(9 名男性,8 名女性)。方法:共招募了 24 名 PFP 患者(15 名男性,9 名女性)和 17 名健康人(9 名男性,8 名女性),收集了 SLVJ 和 SLHJ 的推进和着陆阶段的三维运动学和动力学数据。采用双向方差分析对各组(PFP 与健康对照组)和性别(男性与女性)之间的因变量进行比较:在 SLHJ 中,男性和女性 PFP 组的跳跃距离均小于对照组(p = 0.002),但在 SLVJ 中未发现显著差异。与对照组相比,PFP 组男性和女性在 SLHJ 的推进阶段都显示出髋关节做功增加(p = 0.005)和贡献增加(p = 0.009),而膝关节做功贡献减少(p = 0.034)。此外,与男性相比,PFP 组和对照组的女性参与者的跳跃距离更短(p ≤ 0.001),在纵跳和横跳的推进阶段膝关节做功更少(p < 0.001):结论:单腿水平跳更适合用于评估PFP患者的下肢功能,其特点是膝关节做功减少影响了跳跃表现,这适用于男性和女性PFP患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-leg horizontal jump is more suitable for assessing lower limb function compared to single-leg vertical jump in patellofemoral pain patients

Background

The single-leg vertical jump (SLVJ) and single-leg horizontal jump (SLHJ) are commonly used assessments for individuals with lower limb injuries. Despite previous studies comparing these tasks across various individuals, their comparative effectiveness in evaluating lower limb function in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and any potential sex differences in these functional tests remain uncertain.

Research question

The purpose of this study was to determine which jump task is more suitable for functional assessment in PFP patients by comparing the differences in jump performance and biomechanical variables between PFP patients and healthy individuals during the SLVJ and SLHJ. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine whether the more suitable functional assessment for male and female PFP patients is consistent.

Methods

A total of 24 PFP patients (15 males, 9 females) and 17 healthy individuals (9 males, 8 females) were recruited. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected during the propulsion and landing phases of the SLVJ and SLHJ. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare each dependent variable between groups (PFP vs. healthy controls) and sex (male vs. female).

Results

Both male and female PFP groups presented a reduced jump distance than the control group in the SLHJ (p = 0.002), but no significant difference was detected in the SLVJ. Both male and female PFP groups displayed increased hip work (p = 0.005) and contribution (p = 0.009) and reduced knee work contribution (p = 0.034) during the propulsion phase of the SLHJ compared to the control group. Moreover, female participants of PFP and control groups performed shorter jump distances (p ≤ 0.001) and had less knee work (p < 0.001) during the propulsion phase of vertical and horizontal jumps than males.

Conclusion

Single-leg horizontal jump is more suitable for assessing lower limb function in PFP patients, characterized by reduced knee work contribution impacting jump performance, and this applies to both male and female PFP patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Ankle-hip joint trade-off in normal gait: Exploring the kinematic influence of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot In Vivo Assessment of Shoulder Stability in Dynamic Rehabilitation Exercises: A Scoping Review Quality, kinematics, and self-reported comfort of gait during body weight support in young adults with gait impairments – A cross-sectional study The role of waddling gait in balance control during pregnancy Valgus deformity of the distal tibia in children and adolescents with idiopathic flatfoot: Can it be predicted using 3D movement analysis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1