Bauyrzhan Biakhmetov, Yue Li, Qunshan Zhao, Abay Dostiyarov, David Flynn, Siming You
{"title":"以运输和流程建模为辅助,对从未回收的城市塑料废物中回收资源进行技术经济评估","authors":"Bauyrzhan Biakhmetov, Yue Li, Qunshan Zhao, Abay Dostiyarov, David Flynn, Siming You","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Less than one-tenth of municipal plastic waste generated is mechanically recycled, resulting in the remainder ending up in incineration plants or landfills worldwide. There is limited consideration on the effects of system scales and transportation processes on the economic feasibility of municipal plastic waste treatment. In this study, a techno-economic assessment framework was developed for pyrolysis-based resource recovery from non-recycled municipal plastic waste. The framework incorporates detailed transportation and process modelling with cost-benefit analysis, which enables greater assessment flexibility and accuracy and the accounting of the effects of system scale. The techno-economic feasibility of centralized large-scale and decentralized small-scale systems that recover value-added fuels (diesel and hydrogen), with and without carbon capture and storage units, were compared. The large-scale diesel system without carbon capture and storage reflected a real-world demonstrator, while other systems considered in this study were proposed alternatives to non-recycled municipal plastic waste management. Specifically, the municipal plastic waste transportation, and pyrolysis-based diesel and hydrogen production from non-recycled municipal plastic waste were modelled and simulated using ArcGIS Pro and Aspen Plus software, respectively. The data of transportation and process modelling were feed into a cost-benefit analysis to calculate the net present values of relevant developments. It was shown that only centralized large-scale diesel production, with and without carbon capture and storage, exhibited total positive net present values (£22,240,135 and £24,449,631, respectively), indicating their economic feasibility. The decentralized small-scale hydrogen production system with carbon capture and storage yielded the lowest net present value result (−£2,391) per tonne of treated non-recycled municipal plastic waste. Particularly, the production of diesel and hydrogen from non-recycled municipal plastic systems, with carbon dioxide emissions to the environment, demonstrated better economic performance than the same systems capturing and storing carbon dioxide, attributable to its higher capital and operational expenditures. Finally, sensitivity analysis revealed that the fuel sales price and OPEX had the most significant impact on the net present values.","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transportation and process modelling-assisted techno-economic assessment of resource recovery from non-recycled municipal plastic waste\",\"authors\":\"Bauyrzhan Biakhmetov, Yue Li, Qunshan Zhao, Abay Dostiyarov, David Flynn, Siming You\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Less than one-tenth of municipal plastic waste generated is mechanically recycled, resulting in the remainder ending up in incineration plants or landfills worldwide. There is limited consideration on the effects of system scales and transportation processes on the economic feasibility of municipal plastic waste treatment. In this study, a techno-economic assessment framework was developed for pyrolysis-based resource recovery from non-recycled municipal plastic waste. The framework incorporates detailed transportation and process modelling with cost-benefit analysis, which enables greater assessment flexibility and accuracy and the accounting of the effects of system scale. The techno-economic feasibility of centralized large-scale and decentralized small-scale systems that recover value-added fuels (diesel and hydrogen), with and without carbon capture and storage units, were compared. The large-scale diesel system without carbon capture and storage reflected a real-world demonstrator, while other systems considered in this study were proposed alternatives to non-recycled municipal plastic waste management. Specifically, the municipal plastic waste transportation, and pyrolysis-based diesel and hydrogen production from non-recycled municipal plastic waste were modelled and simulated using ArcGIS Pro and Aspen Plus software, respectively. The data of transportation and process modelling were feed into a cost-benefit analysis to calculate the net present values of relevant developments. It was shown that only centralized large-scale diesel production, with and without carbon capture and storage, exhibited total positive net present values (£22,240,135 and £24,449,631, respectively), indicating their economic feasibility. The decentralized small-scale hydrogen production system with carbon capture and storage yielded the lowest net present value result (−£2,391) per tonne of treated non-recycled municipal plastic waste. Particularly, the production of diesel and hydrogen from non-recycled municipal plastic systems, with carbon dioxide emissions to the environment, demonstrated better economic performance than the same systems capturing and storing carbon dioxide, attributable to its higher capital and operational expenditures. Finally, sensitivity analysis revealed that the fuel sales price and OPEX had the most significant impact on the net present values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119273\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119273","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
全世界产生的城市塑料垃圾中,只有不到十分之一得到机械回收利用,其余的最终被送往焚烧厂或垃圾填埋场。关于系统规模和运输过程对城市塑料垃圾处理经济可行性的影响,目前考虑的还很有限。在这项研究中,针对基于热解的非回收城市塑料废物资源回收,开发了一个技术经济评估框架。该框架将详细的运输和工艺建模与成本效益分析相结合,从而提高了评估的灵活性和准确性,并考虑了系统规模的影响。比较了集中式大规模系统和分散式小规模系统的技术经济可行性,这两种系统都能回收增值燃料(柴油和氢气),并配有和不配有碳捕集与封存装置。不带碳捕集与封存装置的大型柴油系统反映了现实世界中的一个示范项目,而本研究中考虑的其他系统则是针对不可回收的城市塑料废物管理提出的替代方案。具体而言,城市塑料垃圾运输、基于热解的非回收城市塑料垃圾柴油和氢气生产分别使用 ArcGIS Pro 和 Aspen Plus 软件进行建模和模拟。运输和工艺建模数据被纳入成本效益分析,以计算相关开发的净现值。结果表明,只有集中式大规模柴油生产,包括碳捕集与封存和不包括碳捕集与封存,才显示出总的正净现值(分别为 22,240,135 英镑和 24,449,631 英镑),表明其经济可行性。有碳捕集与封存功能的分散式小型氢气生产系统的净现值最低(-2,391 英镑),每吨处理后的非回收城市塑料废物的净现值为-2,391 英镑。特别是,与捕获和储存二氧化碳的系统相比,利用非回收城市塑料系统生产柴油和氢气并向环境排放二氧化碳的系统具有更好的经济效益,这归因于其较高的资本和运营支出。最后,敏感性分析表明,燃料销售价格和运营支出对净现值的影响最大。
Transportation and process modelling-assisted techno-economic assessment of resource recovery from non-recycled municipal plastic waste
Less than one-tenth of municipal plastic waste generated is mechanically recycled, resulting in the remainder ending up in incineration plants or landfills worldwide. There is limited consideration on the effects of system scales and transportation processes on the economic feasibility of municipal plastic waste treatment. In this study, a techno-economic assessment framework was developed for pyrolysis-based resource recovery from non-recycled municipal plastic waste. The framework incorporates detailed transportation and process modelling with cost-benefit analysis, which enables greater assessment flexibility and accuracy and the accounting of the effects of system scale. The techno-economic feasibility of centralized large-scale and decentralized small-scale systems that recover value-added fuels (diesel and hydrogen), with and without carbon capture and storage units, were compared. The large-scale diesel system without carbon capture and storage reflected a real-world demonstrator, while other systems considered in this study were proposed alternatives to non-recycled municipal plastic waste management. Specifically, the municipal plastic waste transportation, and pyrolysis-based diesel and hydrogen production from non-recycled municipal plastic waste were modelled and simulated using ArcGIS Pro and Aspen Plus software, respectively. The data of transportation and process modelling were feed into a cost-benefit analysis to calculate the net present values of relevant developments. It was shown that only centralized large-scale diesel production, with and without carbon capture and storage, exhibited total positive net present values (£22,240,135 and £24,449,631, respectively), indicating their economic feasibility. The decentralized small-scale hydrogen production system with carbon capture and storage yielded the lowest net present value result (−£2,391) per tonne of treated non-recycled municipal plastic waste. Particularly, the production of diesel and hydrogen from non-recycled municipal plastic systems, with carbon dioxide emissions to the environment, demonstrated better economic performance than the same systems capturing and storing carbon dioxide, attributable to its higher capital and operational expenditures. Finally, sensitivity analysis revealed that the fuel sales price and OPEX had the most significant impact on the net present values.
期刊介绍:
The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics.
The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.