{"title":"不同水处理条件下华北玉米田土壤呼吸量的日变化和季节变化","authors":"Mengfei Zhang, Wenting Han, Chaoqun Li, Liyuan Zhang, Manman Peng, Tonghua Wang, Xiangwei Chen","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.4985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To further evaluate the effect of water stress on soil respiration (R<sub>S</sub>), reveal the influencing factors of daily and seasonal R<sub>S</sub>, and systematically evaluate and compare the sensibility of different machine learning algorithms (multiple nonlinear regression [MNR], support vector machine regression [SVR], backpropagation artificial neural network [BPNN]) to estimate R<sub>S</sub> from a maize field under water stress condition, the field experiments were conducted within a maize field in Inner Mongolia, China, during the entire 2019 growing season. Various levels of deficit irrigation were conducted in the vegetative, reproductive, and mature stages. Our research indicated that soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes from 100% evapotranspiration treatment (Tr1) were significantly greater than various deficit irrigation treatments (Tr2, Tr3, Tr4) during each growth stage of summer maize. The cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes of Tr2, Tr3, and Tr4 decreased 24.8%, 30.3%, and 43.7% compared with Tr1, respectively. We determined that the drivers affecting the daily R<sub>S</sub> were soil temperature at 5 cm depth (<i>T</i><sub>S,5</sub>) and soil surface temperature (<i>T</i><sub>SF</sub>), followed by water-filled porosity (WFPS) at 5 cm depth, but no significant correlations were observed at 25 cm depths. <i>T</i><sub>S,5</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>SF</sub> also performed similar correlation with seasonal R<sub>S</sub> with <i>R</i> greater than 0.753 among all water treatments, followed by chlorophyll content with <i>R</i> greater than 0.726. During the whole growing season, the BPNN model exhibited the best predicting result, and could explain the 60%–80% and 87.8% of the variations of R<sub>S</sub> at the daily and seasonal scales, with root mean square error of 48.7–100.9 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup> and 91.5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The SVR and MNR models could estimate the 47.9%–57% and 39.9%–52.1% of the daily R<sub>S</sub> and 81.4% and 78.6% of the seasonal R<sub>S</sub>, respectively. Overall, our study indicated the machine learning algorithms could be successfully applied to estimate R<sub>S</sub> at daily and seasonal scales from a maize field under water stress condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4985","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daily and seasonal variations of soil respiration from maize field under different water treatments in North China\",\"authors\":\"Mengfei Zhang, Wenting Han, Chaoqun Li, Liyuan Zhang, Manman Peng, Tonghua Wang, Xiangwei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.4985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To further evaluate the effect of water stress on soil respiration (R<sub>S</sub>), reveal the influencing factors of daily and seasonal R<sub>S</sub>, and systematically evaluate and compare the sensibility of different machine learning algorithms (multiple nonlinear regression [MNR], support vector machine regression [SVR], backpropagation artificial neural network [BPNN]) to estimate R<sub>S</sub> from a maize field under water stress condition, the field experiments were conducted within a maize field in Inner Mongolia, China, during the entire 2019 growing season. Various levels of deficit irrigation were conducted in the vegetative, reproductive, and mature stages. Our research indicated that soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes from 100% evapotranspiration treatment (Tr1) were significantly greater than various deficit irrigation treatments (Tr2, Tr3, Tr4) during each growth stage of summer maize. The cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes of Tr2, Tr3, and Tr4 decreased 24.8%, 30.3%, and 43.7% compared with Tr1, respectively. We determined that the drivers affecting the daily R<sub>S</sub> were soil temperature at 5 cm depth (<i>T</i><sub>S,5</sub>) and soil surface temperature (<i>T</i><sub>SF</sub>), followed by water-filled porosity (WFPS) at 5 cm depth, but no significant correlations were observed at 25 cm depths. <i>T</i><sub>S,5</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>SF</sub> also performed similar correlation with seasonal R<sub>S</sub> with <i>R</i> greater than 0.753 among all water treatments, followed by chlorophyll content with <i>R</i> greater than 0.726. During the whole growing season, the BPNN model exhibited the best predicting result, and could explain the 60%–80% and 87.8% of the variations of R<sub>S</sub> at the daily and seasonal scales, with root mean square error of 48.7–100.9 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup> and 91.5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The SVR and MNR models could estimate the 47.9%–57% and 39.9%–52.1% of the daily R<sub>S</sub> and 81.4% and 78.6% of the seasonal R<sub>S</sub>, respectively. Overall, our study indicated the machine learning algorithms could be successfully applied to estimate R<sub>S</sub> at daily and seasonal scales from a maize field under water stress condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4985\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Daily and seasonal variations of soil respiration from maize field under different water treatments in North China
To further evaluate the effect of water stress on soil respiration (RS), reveal the influencing factors of daily and seasonal RS, and systematically evaluate and compare the sensibility of different machine learning algorithms (multiple nonlinear regression [MNR], support vector machine regression [SVR], backpropagation artificial neural network [BPNN]) to estimate RS from a maize field under water stress condition, the field experiments were conducted within a maize field in Inner Mongolia, China, during the entire 2019 growing season. Various levels of deficit irrigation were conducted in the vegetative, reproductive, and mature stages. Our research indicated that soil CO2 fluxes from 100% evapotranspiration treatment (Tr1) were significantly greater than various deficit irrigation treatments (Tr2, Tr3, Tr4) during each growth stage of summer maize. The cumulative soil CO2 fluxes of Tr2, Tr3, and Tr4 decreased 24.8%, 30.3%, and 43.7% compared with Tr1, respectively. We determined that the drivers affecting the daily RS were soil temperature at 5 cm depth (TS,5) and soil surface temperature (TSF), followed by water-filled porosity (WFPS) at 5 cm depth, but no significant correlations were observed at 25 cm depths. TS,5 and TSF also performed similar correlation with seasonal RS with R greater than 0.753 among all water treatments, followed by chlorophyll content with R greater than 0.726. During the whole growing season, the BPNN model exhibited the best predicting result, and could explain the 60%–80% and 87.8% of the variations of RS at the daily and seasonal scales, with root mean square error of 48.7–100.9 mg m−2 h−1 and 91.5 mg m−2 h−1, respectively. The SVR and MNR models could estimate the 47.9%–57% and 39.9%–52.1% of the daily RS and 81.4% and 78.6% of the seasonal RS, respectively. Overall, our study indicated the machine learning algorithms could be successfully applied to estimate RS at daily and seasonal scales from a maize field under water stress condition.
期刊介绍:
The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.