二价 mRNA 强化疫苗接种的效果与 Omicron 期间老年人的既往感染情况:真实世界的证据。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae251
Pedro-Pablo España, Idoia Castillo-Sintes, Maria J Legarreta, Amaia Bilbao-González, Nere Larrea, Maria Gascon, Ane Uranga, Amaia Artaraz, Julia Garcia-Asensio, Jose M Quintana
{"title":"二价 mRNA 强化疫苗接种的效果与 Omicron 期间老年人的既往感染情况:真实世界的证据。","authors":"Pedro-Pablo España, Idoia Castillo-Sintes, Maria J Legarreta, Amaia Bilbao-González, Nere Larrea, Maria Gascon, Ane Uranga, Amaia Artaraz, Julia Garcia-Asensio, Jose M Quintana","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of booster bivalent vaccines against the Omicron variant, particularly amongst older patients, remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to compare the relative effectiveness of a fourth dose of vaccine using bivalent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), by comparing patients who had and had not received this dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to assess the risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death of people aged >60 years with four doses as compared to those with only three doses. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We adjusted by age, sex, nursing-home, comorbidities, primary care setting and previous episodes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. We also investigated the impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection within each cohort, using the same methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The administration of a fourth bivalent mRNA vaccine dose conferred significant additional protection against COVID-19 infection (HR: 0.479; 95% CI: 0.454-0.506), hospitalization (HR: 0.393; 95% CI: 0.348-0.443) and 30-day mortality (HR: 0.234; 95% CI: 0.171-0.318), as compared to individuals who had received only a third monovalent vaccine dose. In both cohorts, a prior history of COVID-19 infection involves lower risk of COVID-infection, hospitalization and death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the period of Omicron predominance, receiving a bivalent booster vaccine as a fourth dose, as compared to receiving only three doses of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, provides significant extra protection against COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality. Antecedents of SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination involves a notable reduction in the above COVID-19 outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"53 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccination and previous infection in older adults during Omicron period: real-world evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro-Pablo España, Idoia Castillo-Sintes, Maria J Legarreta, Amaia Bilbao-González, Nere Larrea, Maria Gascon, Ane Uranga, Amaia Artaraz, Julia Garcia-Asensio, Jose M Quintana\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afae251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of booster bivalent vaccines against the Omicron variant, particularly amongst older patients, remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to compare the relative effectiveness of a fourth dose of vaccine using bivalent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), by comparing patients who had and had not received this dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to assess the risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death of people aged >60 years with four doses as compared to those with only three doses. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We adjusted by age, sex, nursing-home, comorbidities, primary care setting and previous episodes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. We also investigated the impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection within each cohort, using the same methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The administration of a fourth bivalent mRNA vaccine dose conferred significant additional protection against COVID-19 infection (HR: 0.479; 95% CI: 0.454-0.506), hospitalization (HR: 0.393; 95% CI: 0.348-0.443) and 30-day mortality (HR: 0.234; 95% CI: 0.171-0.318), as compared to individuals who had received only a third monovalent vaccine dose. In both cohorts, a prior history of COVID-19 infection involves lower risk of COVID-infection, hospitalization and death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the period of Omicron predominance, receiving a bivalent booster vaccine as a fourth dose, as compared to receiving only three doses of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, provides significant extra protection against COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality. Antecedents of SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination involves a notable reduction in the above COVID-19 outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"53 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae251\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对奥米克龙变异株的二价强化疫苗的效果仍不确定,尤其是在老年患者中:我们试图通过比较接种过和未接种过二价信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗的患者,来比较接种第四剂疫苗的相对效果:我们进行了一项匹配的回顾性队列研究,评估接种四剂与仅接种三剂的 60 岁以上人群感染 COVID-19 病毒、住院和死亡的风险。研究采用 Cox 比例危险回归模型估算调整后的危险比 (HRs),并得出 95% 的置信区间 (CIs)。我们根据年龄、性别、疗养院、合并症、初级医疗机构和既往严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染病例进行了调整。我们还采用相同的方法调查了每个队列中之前感染 SARS-CoV-2 的影响:结果:与只接种过第三剂单价疫苗的人相比,接种第四剂二价 mRNA 疫苗可显著降低 COVID-19 感染(HR:0.479;95% CI:0.454-0.506)、住院(HR:0.393;95% CI:0.348-0.443)和 30 天死亡率(HR:0.234;95% CI:0.171-0.318)。在这两组人群中,既往有COVID-19感染史的人感染COVID、住院和死亡的风险较低:结论:在 Omicron 流行期间,与只接种三剂单价 mRNA 疫苗相比,接种四剂二价强化疫苗可在 COVID-19 感染、住院和死亡方面提供显著的额外保护。接种疫苗前的 SARS-CoV-2 前兆会显著减少 COVID-19 的上述结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccination and previous infection in older adults during Omicron period: real-world evidence.

Background: The effectiveness of booster bivalent vaccines against the Omicron variant, particularly amongst older patients, remains uncertain.

Objective: We sought to compare the relative effectiveness of a fourth dose of vaccine using bivalent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), by comparing patients who had and had not received this dose.

Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to assess the risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death of people aged >60 years with four doses as compared to those with only three doses. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We adjusted by age, sex, nursing-home, comorbidities, primary care setting and previous episodes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. We also investigated the impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection within each cohort, using the same methodology.

Results: The administration of a fourth bivalent mRNA vaccine dose conferred significant additional protection against COVID-19 infection (HR: 0.479; 95% CI: 0.454-0.506), hospitalization (HR: 0.393; 95% CI: 0.348-0.443) and 30-day mortality (HR: 0.234; 95% CI: 0.171-0.318), as compared to individuals who had received only a third monovalent vaccine dose. In both cohorts, a prior history of COVID-19 infection involves lower risk of COVID-infection, hospitalization and death.

Conclusions: During the period of Omicron predominance, receiving a bivalent booster vaccine as a fourth dose, as compared to receiving only three doses of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, provides significant extra protection against COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality. Antecedents of SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination involves a notable reduction in the above COVID-19 outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of guideline recommendations for older and frail adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus A scoping review of the measurement and analysis of frailty in randomised controlled trials The effect of multidomain lifestyle intervention on health care service use and costs - secondary analyses from the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial Menopause age and type and dementia risk: a pooled analysis of 233 802 women Equality of opportunity for timely dementia diagnosis (EQUATED): a qualitative study of how people from minoritised ethnic groups experience the early symptoms of dementia and seek help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1