元种群中孢子策略的选择可导致共存。

IF 3.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Evolution Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpae161
Stephen R Proulx, Taom Sakal, Zach Reitz, Kelly Thomasson
{"title":"元种群中孢子策略的选择可导致共存。","authors":"Stephen R Proulx, Taom Sakal, Zach Reitz, Kelly Thomasson","doi":"10.1093/evolut/qpae161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In constant environments the coexistence of similar species or genotypes is generally limited. In a metapopulation context, however, types that utilize the same resource but are distributed along a competition-colonization trade-off, can coexist. Much thought in this area focuses on a generic trade-off between within-deme competitive ability and between-deme dispersal ability. We point out that the sporulation program in yeasts and other microbes can create a natural trade-off such that strains which initiate sporulation at higher rates suffer in terms of within-deme competition but benefit in terms of between deme dispersal. We develop metapopulation models where the within- deme behavior follows chemostat dynamics. We first show that the rate of sporulation determines the colonization ability of the strain, with colonization ability increasing with sporulation rate up to a point. Metapopulation stability of a single strain exists in a defined range of sporulation rates. We then use pairwise invasability plots to show that coexistence of strains with different sporulation rates generally occurs, but that the set of sporulation rates that can potentially coexist is smaller than the set that allows for stable metapopulations. We extend our pairwise results to show how a continuous set of strains can coexist and verify our conclusions with numerical calculations and stochastic simulations. Our results show that stable variation in sporulation rates is expected under a wide range of ecological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12082,"journal":{"name":"Evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection on sporulation strategies in a metapopulation can lead to coexistence.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen R Proulx, Taom Sakal, Zach Reitz, Kelly Thomasson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/evolut/qpae161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In constant environments the coexistence of similar species or genotypes is generally limited. In a metapopulation context, however, types that utilize the same resource but are distributed along a competition-colonization trade-off, can coexist. Much thought in this area focuses on a generic trade-off between within-deme competitive ability and between-deme dispersal ability. We point out that the sporulation program in yeasts and other microbes can create a natural trade-off such that strains which initiate sporulation at higher rates suffer in terms of within-deme competition but benefit in terms of between deme dispersal. We develop metapopulation models where the within- deme behavior follows chemostat dynamics. We first show that the rate of sporulation determines the colonization ability of the strain, with colonization ability increasing with sporulation rate up to a point. Metapopulation stability of a single strain exists in a defined range of sporulation rates. We then use pairwise invasability plots to show that coexistence of strains with different sporulation rates generally occurs, but that the set of sporulation rates that can potentially coexist is smaller than the set that allows for stable metapopulations. We extend our pairwise results to show how a continuous set of strains can coexist and verify our conclusions with numerical calculations and stochastic simulations. Our results show that stable variation in sporulation rates is expected under a wide range of ecological conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpae161\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpae161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在恒定的环境中,相似物种或基因型的共存通常是有限的。然而,在元种群环境中,利用相同资源但分布在竞争-殖民化权衡中的类型可以共存。这方面的许多想法都集中在种内竞争能力和种间扩散能力之间的一般权衡上。我们指出,酵母菌和其他微生物的孢子繁殖程序会产生一种自然的权衡,即孢子繁殖率较高的菌株会在菌丝内竞争中受损,但在菌丝间扩散中受益。我们建立了元种群模型,其中种群内的行为遵循恒温器动力学。我们首先证明,孢子繁殖率决定了菌株的定殖能力,定殖能力随着孢子繁殖率的增加而增加,直至达到一个点。单一菌株的种群稳定性存在于确定的孢子繁殖率范围内。然后,我们使用配对入侵图来表明,具有不同孢子繁殖率的菌株一般会共存,但可能共存的孢子繁殖率集合小于允许稳定元种群的集合。我们扩展了成对结果,以说明连续的菌株集如何共存,并通过数值计算和随机模拟验证了我们的结论。我们的结果表明,在广泛的生态条件下,孢子繁殖率的稳定变化是可以预期的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selection on sporulation strategies in a metapopulation can lead to coexistence.

In constant environments the coexistence of similar species or genotypes is generally limited. In a metapopulation context, however, types that utilize the same resource but are distributed along a competition-colonization trade-off, can coexist. Much thought in this area focuses on a generic trade-off between within-deme competitive ability and between-deme dispersal ability. We point out that the sporulation program in yeasts and other microbes can create a natural trade-off such that strains which initiate sporulation at higher rates suffer in terms of within-deme competition but benefit in terms of between deme dispersal. We develop metapopulation models where the within- deme behavior follows chemostat dynamics. We first show that the rate of sporulation determines the colonization ability of the strain, with colonization ability increasing with sporulation rate up to a point. Metapopulation stability of a single strain exists in a defined range of sporulation rates. We then use pairwise invasability plots to show that coexistence of strains with different sporulation rates generally occurs, but that the set of sporulation rates that can potentially coexist is smaller than the set that allows for stable metapopulations. We extend our pairwise results to show how a continuous set of strains can coexist and verify our conclusions with numerical calculations and stochastic simulations. Our results show that stable variation in sporulation rates is expected under a wide range of ecological conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution
Evolution 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution, published for the Society for the Study of Evolution, is the premier publication devoted to the study of organic evolution and the integration of the various fields of science concerned with evolution. The journal presents significant and original results that extend our understanding of evolutionary phenomena and processes.
期刊最新文献
Extended phenotype affects somatic phenotype in spiders: web builders have lower estimated biting forces than free hunters. Rapid evolution of recombination landscapes during the divergence of cichlid ecotypes in Lake Masoko. Correlated evolution of categorical characters under a simple model. Selection on sporulation strategies in a metapopulation can lead to coexistence. Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1