围产期焦虑的识别和管理的可接受性:对产后妇女的定性访谈研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466150
Rose Meades, Patricia M Moran, Una Hutton, Rafiyah Khan, Margaret Maxwell, Helen Cheyne, Amy Delicate, Judy Shakespeare, Kathryn Hollins, Kalpa Pisavadia, Kodchawan Pim Doungsong, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Andrea Sinesi, Susan Ayers
{"title":"围产期焦虑的识别和管理的可接受性:对产后妇女的定性访谈研究。","authors":"Rose Meades, Patricia M Moran, Una Hutton, Rafiyah Khan, Margaret Maxwell, Helen Cheyne, Amy Delicate, Judy Shakespeare, Kathryn Hollins, Kalpa Pisavadia, Kodchawan Pim Doungsong, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Andrea Sinesi, Susan Ayers","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety in pregnancy and postpartum is highly prevalent but under-recognized and few women receive adequate support or treatment. Identification and management of perinatal anxiety must be acceptable to women in the perinatal period to ensure that women receive appropriate care when needed. We aimed to understand the acceptability to women of how anxiety was identified and managed by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 60 women across England and Scotland approximately 10 months after birth. Women were sampled from an existing systematically recruited cohort of 2,243 women who recorded mental health throughout pregnancy and after birth. All women met criteria for further assessment of their mental health by a healthcare professional. We analyzed the data using a theoretical framework of acceptability of healthcare interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview data fitted the seven constructs within the theoretical framework of acceptability. Women valued support before professional treatment but were poorly informed about available services. Services which treated women as individuals, which were accessible and in which there was continuity of healthcare professional were endorsed. Experience of poor maternity services increased anxiety and seeing multiple midwives dissuaded women from engaging in conversations about mental health. Having a trusted relationship with a healthcare professional facilitated conversation about and disclosure of mental health problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women's experiences would be improved if given the opportunity to form a trusting relationship with a healthcare provider. Interventions offering support before professional treatment may be valued and suitable for some women. Clear information about support services and treatment options available for perinatal mental health problems should be given. Physiological aspects of maternity care impacts women's mental health and trust in services needs to be restored. Findings can be used to inform clinical guidelines and research on acceptable perinatal care pathways in pregnancy and after birth and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1466150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of identification and management of perinatal anxiety: a qualitative interview study with postnatal women.\",\"authors\":\"Rose Meades, Patricia M Moran, Una Hutton, Rafiyah Khan, Margaret Maxwell, Helen Cheyne, Amy Delicate, Judy Shakespeare, Kathryn Hollins, Kalpa Pisavadia, Kodchawan Pim Doungsong, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Andrea Sinesi, Susan Ayers\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety in pregnancy and postpartum is highly prevalent but under-recognized and few women receive adequate support or treatment. Identification and management of perinatal anxiety must be acceptable to women in the perinatal period to ensure that women receive appropriate care when needed. We aimed to understand the acceptability to women of how anxiety was identified and managed by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 60 women across England and Scotland approximately 10 months after birth. Women were sampled from an existing systematically recruited cohort of 2,243 women who recorded mental health throughout pregnancy and after birth. All women met criteria for further assessment of their mental health by a healthcare professional. We analyzed the data using a theoretical framework of acceptability of healthcare interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview data fitted the seven constructs within the theoretical framework of acceptability. Women valued support before professional treatment but were poorly informed about available services. Services which treated women as individuals, which were accessible and in which there was continuity of healthcare professional were endorsed. Experience of poor maternity services increased anxiety and seeing multiple midwives dissuaded women from engaging in conversations about mental health. Having a trusted relationship with a healthcare professional facilitated conversation about and disclosure of mental health problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women's experiences would be improved if given the opportunity to form a trusting relationship with a healthcare provider. Interventions offering support before professional treatment may be valued and suitable for some women. Clear information about support services and treatment options available for perinatal mental health problems should be given. Physiological aspects of maternity care impacts women's mental health and trust in services needs to be restored. Findings can be used to inform clinical guidelines and research on acceptable perinatal care pathways in pregnancy and after birth and future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1466150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:孕期和产后焦虑症的发病率很高,但却未得到充分认识,很少有妇女能得到足够的支持或治疗。围产期焦虑症的识别和管理必须为围产期妇女所接受,以确保妇女在需要时得到适当的护理。我们旨在了解妇女对医护人员如何识别和管理焦虑症的接受程度:我们在英格兰和苏格兰对 60 名产后约 10 个月的妇女进行了深入的定性访谈。这些妇女是从现有的 2,243 名记录了整个孕期和产后心理健康情况的系统性招募人群中抽取的。所有妇女都符合由医疗保健专业人员对其心理健康进行进一步评估的标准。我们采用医疗干预可接受性的理论框架对数据进行了分析:结果:访谈数据符合可接受性理论框架中的七个结构。妇女重视专业治疗前的支持,但对可获得的服务知之甚少。将妇女作为个体对待的服务、可获得的服务以及医疗保健专业人员的连续性得到了认可。糟糕的产科服务增加了妇女的焦虑感,而与多名助产士的接触又使妇女不愿就心理健康问 题进行交谈。与医疗保健专业人员之间的信任关系有助于谈论和披露心理健康问题:结论:如果有机会与医疗服务提供者建立信任关系,妇女的经历将会得到改善。在专业治疗前提供支持的干预措施可能会受到重视,并适合某些女性。应提供有关围产期心理健康问题的支持服务和治疗方案的明确信息。产科护理的生理方面会影响妇女的心理健康,因此需要恢复她们对服务的信任。研究结果可用于临床指南、孕期和产后可接受的围产期护理路径研究以及未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acceptability of identification and management of perinatal anxiety: a qualitative interview study with postnatal women.

Background: Anxiety in pregnancy and postpartum is highly prevalent but under-recognized and few women receive adequate support or treatment. Identification and management of perinatal anxiety must be acceptable to women in the perinatal period to ensure that women receive appropriate care when needed. We aimed to understand the acceptability to women of how anxiety was identified and managed by healthcare professionals.

Method: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 60 women across England and Scotland approximately 10 months after birth. Women were sampled from an existing systematically recruited cohort of 2,243 women who recorded mental health throughout pregnancy and after birth. All women met criteria for further assessment of their mental health by a healthcare professional. We analyzed the data using a theoretical framework of acceptability of healthcare interventions.

Results: Interview data fitted the seven constructs within the theoretical framework of acceptability. Women valued support before professional treatment but were poorly informed about available services. Services which treated women as individuals, which were accessible and in which there was continuity of healthcare professional were endorsed. Experience of poor maternity services increased anxiety and seeing multiple midwives dissuaded women from engaging in conversations about mental health. Having a trusted relationship with a healthcare professional facilitated conversation about and disclosure of mental health problems.

Conclusion: Women's experiences would be improved if given the opportunity to form a trusting relationship with a healthcare provider. Interventions offering support before professional treatment may be valued and suitable for some women. Clear information about support services and treatment options available for perinatal mental health problems should be given. Physiological aspects of maternity care impacts women's mental health and trust in services needs to be restored. Findings can be used to inform clinical guidelines and research on acceptable perinatal care pathways in pregnancy and after birth and future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Chinese college students' attitude to physical exercise and psychological capital: the mediating effects of self-control and gender. Psychosocial, emotional and behavioral problems, quality of life, and mental health care seeking behaviors among children and adolescents in Jordan: a national school-based survey. Neocolonialism and science diplomacy: lessons learned from the field and the way forward. Are we doing enough to control infection risk in Australian small animal veterinary practice? Findings from a mixed methods study. Can China's national comprehensive medical reform increase medical resources and reduce healthcare burden: evidence from Chinese provinces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1