{"title":"重拾旧蓝图:是时候重新考虑将代谢谷氨酸受体 2 用于治疗药物开发了吗?","authors":"Anton Bespalov, Robert Lütjens, Dario Doller","doi":"10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGlu<sub>2</sub>) is a heavily studied therapeutic target in neuropsychiatry for which we anticipate a renewed interest in the near future. We review the rationale and the outcome of clinical trials with mGlu<sub>2/3</sub> receptor agonists in schizophrenia, a field of intense research since a seminal publication by Patel and colleagues (2007). We summarize evidence about selective, potent and safe agents with quantifiable CNS penetration that can be used to test hypotheses of mGlu<sub>2</sub> receptors involvement in neuropsychiatric diseases. We summarize lessons learned from previous programs that should be considered to maximize the probability of success when targeting orthosteric and allosteric enhancement of mGlu<sub>2</sub> receptor function in schizophrenia and beyond. First, we propose expanding our focus beyond presynaptic mGlu<sub>2</sub> receptor stimulation in schizophrenia to novel hypotheses and that the choice of a therapeutic indication no longer be dictated by commercial opportunity but following science as a driver. Second, evidence on internal validity of preclinical studies supporting efficacy claims in the mGlu<sub>2</sub> field is very limited. This gap will need to be closed when reviewing the rationale to re-initiate efforts in this field. Third, the pomaglumetad program was halted due to insufficient clinical efficacy, partly because of the inability to identify a treatment responder population. In preclinical studies, effects of mGlu<sub>2/3</sub> receptor stimulation also seemed to vary significantly between laboratories. Definition of the responsive subject population and development of response-predicting biomarkers is therefore one of the main avenues of further research in the mGlu<sub>2</sub> field.</p>","PeriodicalId":19893,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"173908"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dusting off old blueprints: Is it time to reconsider metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 for therapeutic drug development?\",\"authors\":\"Anton Bespalov, Robert Lütjens, Dario Doller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGlu<sub>2</sub>) is a heavily studied therapeutic target in neuropsychiatry for which we anticipate a renewed interest in the near future. We review the rationale and the outcome of clinical trials with mGlu<sub>2/3</sub> receptor agonists in schizophrenia, a field of intense research since a seminal publication by Patel and colleagues (2007). We summarize evidence about selective, potent and safe agents with quantifiable CNS penetration that can be used to test hypotheses of mGlu<sub>2</sub> receptors involvement in neuropsychiatric diseases. We summarize lessons learned from previous programs that should be considered to maximize the probability of success when targeting orthosteric and allosteric enhancement of mGlu<sub>2</sub> receptor function in schizophrenia and beyond. First, we propose expanding our focus beyond presynaptic mGlu<sub>2</sub> receptor stimulation in schizophrenia to novel hypotheses and that the choice of a therapeutic indication no longer be dictated by commercial opportunity but following science as a driver. Second, evidence on internal validity of preclinical studies supporting efficacy claims in the mGlu<sub>2</sub> field is very limited. This gap will need to be closed when reviewing the rationale to re-initiate efforts in this field. Third, the pomaglumetad program was halted due to insufficient clinical efficacy, partly because of the inability to identify a treatment responder population. In preclinical studies, effects of mGlu<sub>2/3</sub> receptor stimulation also seemed to vary significantly between laboratories. Definition of the responsive subject population and development of response-predicting biomarkers is therefore one of the main avenues of further research in the mGlu<sub>2</sub> field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"173908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173908\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dusting off old blueprints: Is it time to reconsider metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 for therapeutic drug development?
The metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGlu2) is a heavily studied therapeutic target in neuropsychiatry for which we anticipate a renewed interest in the near future. We review the rationale and the outcome of clinical trials with mGlu2/3 receptor agonists in schizophrenia, a field of intense research since a seminal publication by Patel and colleagues (2007). We summarize evidence about selective, potent and safe agents with quantifiable CNS penetration that can be used to test hypotheses of mGlu2 receptors involvement in neuropsychiatric diseases. We summarize lessons learned from previous programs that should be considered to maximize the probability of success when targeting orthosteric and allosteric enhancement of mGlu2 receptor function in schizophrenia and beyond. First, we propose expanding our focus beyond presynaptic mGlu2 receptor stimulation in schizophrenia to novel hypotheses and that the choice of a therapeutic indication no longer be dictated by commercial opportunity but following science as a driver. Second, evidence on internal validity of preclinical studies supporting efficacy claims in the mGlu2 field is very limited. This gap will need to be closed when reviewing the rationale to re-initiate efforts in this field. Third, the pomaglumetad program was halted due to insufficient clinical efficacy, partly because of the inability to identify a treatment responder population. In preclinical studies, effects of mGlu2/3 receptor stimulation also seemed to vary significantly between laboratories. Definition of the responsive subject population and development of response-predicting biomarkers is therefore one of the main avenues of further research in the mGlu2 field.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior publishes original reports in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry in which the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. Contributions may involve clinical, preclinical, or basic research. Purely biochemical or toxicology studies will not be published. Papers describing the behavioral effects of novel drugs in models of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive disorders, and central pain must include a positive control unless the paper is on a disease where such a drug is not available yet. Papers focusing on physiological processes (e.g., peripheral pain mechanisms, body temperature regulation, seizure activity) are not accepted as we would like to retain the focus of Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior on behavior and its interaction with the biochemistry and neurochemistry of the central nervous system. Papers describing the effects of plant materials are generally not considered, unless the active ingredients are studied, the extraction method is well described, the doses tested are known, and clear and definite experimental evidence on the mechanism of action of the active ingredients is provided.