{"title":"与灾难相关的伤口护理:范围审查。","authors":"Qin Shu, Xiang Zhang, Yitong Yuan, Zhifang Li, Wei Ren, Beijing Chen, Fei Xie, Guangyun Hu","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To better understand the research status and demand of society on disaster-related wound care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search and screening was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, WHO Guidelines, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, MEDLINE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) Database, and 31 articles were selected from 244 articles for critique and synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Existing disaster-related wound care research lacks a systematic review. In numerous nations, the technology and administration of disaster-related wound care for Emergency Medical Teams (EMT) are still nascent, the responsibilities are ambiguous, and there is a shortage of wound professionals. Current critical issues include the following: (1) inadequate strategies for enhanced orderly management of disaster-related wounds, particularly in an emergency setting and (2) lack of associations and organisations responsible for promoting research and development of catastrophe-related wound care proliferation strategies in disaster wound care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is still a lack of understanding regarding effective organisation and scientific implementation of disaster-related wound care. More research should be carried out, focusing on the formulation of guidelines and continuous training, so as to promote the standardisation of disaster-related wound care in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 11","pages":"e70066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disaster-Related Wound Care: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Shu, Xiang Zhang, Yitong Yuan, Zhifang Li, Wei Ren, Beijing Chen, Fei Xie, Guangyun Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To better understand the research status and demand of society on disaster-related wound care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search and screening was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, WHO Guidelines, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, MEDLINE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) Database, and 31 articles were selected from 244 articles for critique and synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Existing disaster-related wound care research lacks a systematic review. In numerous nations, the technology and administration of disaster-related wound care for Emergency Medical Teams (EMT) are still nascent, the responsibilities are ambiguous, and there is a shortage of wound professionals. Current critical issues include the following: (1) inadequate strategies for enhanced orderly management of disaster-related wounds, particularly in an emergency setting and (2) lack of associations and organisations responsible for promoting research and development of catastrophe-related wound care proliferation strategies in disaster wound care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is still a lack of understanding regarding effective organisation and scientific implementation of disaster-related wound care. More research should be carried out, focusing on the formulation of guidelines and continuous training, so as to promote the standardisation of disaster-related wound care in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":\"11 11\",\"pages\":\"e70066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580811/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:更好地了解灾害相关伤口护理的研究现状和社会需求:范围综述:在PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、WHO指南、Cochrane图书馆、ISI Web of Science、MEDLINE和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)数据库中进行系统检索和筛选,从244篇文章中筛选出31篇进行点评和综合:结果:现有的灾难相关伤口护理研究缺乏系统性综述。在许多国家,紧急医疗队(EMT)的灾难相关伤口护理技术和管理仍处于起步阶段,职责不明确,伤口专业人员短缺。当前的关键问题包括以下几点:(1)加强灾难相关伤口有序管理的策略不足,尤其是在紧急情况下;(2)缺乏负责促进灾难相关伤口护理扩散策略研究和发展的协会和组织:结论:人们对灾害相关伤口护理的有效组织和科学实施仍缺乏了解。结论:对灾害相关伤口护理的有效组织和科学实施仍缺乏了解,应开展更多研究,重点关注指南的制定和持续培训,以促进未来灾害相关伤口护理的标准化。
Aim: To better understand the research status and demand of society on disaster-related wound care.
Design: Scoping review.
Methods: A systematic search and screening was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, WHO Guidelines, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, MEDLINE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) Database, and 31 articles were selected from 244 articles for critique and synthesis.
Results: Existing disaster-related wound care research lacks a systematic review. In numerous nations, the technology and administration of disaster-related wound care for Emergency Medical Teams (EMT) are still nascent, the responsibilities are ambiguous, and there is a shortage of wound professionals. Current critical issues include the following: (1) inadequate strategies for enhanced orderly management of disaster-related wounds, particularly in an emergency setting and (2) lack of associations and organisations responsible for promoting research and development of catastrophe-related wound care proliferation strategies in disaster wound care.
Conclusion: There is still a lack of understanding regarding effective organisation and scientific implementation of disaster-related wound care. More research should be carried out, focusing on the formulation of guidelines and continuous training, so as to promote the standardisation of disaster-related wound care in the future.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally