在角膜偏心值较高的儿童近视控制中,比较角膜塑形镜的试戴和软件验配。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Contact Lens & Anterior Eye Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2024.102334
Liuyun Chong, Ziwen Sun, Yanling Wang, Tianpu Gu, Weiping Lin, Bei Du, Ruihua Wei
{"title":"在角膜偏心值较高的儿童近视控制中,比较角膜塑形镜的试戴和软件验配。","authors":"Liuyun Chong, Ziwen Sun, Yanling Wang, Tianpu Gu, Weiping Lin, Bei Du, Ruihua Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of the trial lens-fitting and software-fitting in orthokeratology for myopia control in children with high corneal eccentric value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Myopic children with high corneal eccentric value (≥0.65) receiving treatment for orthokeratology from July 2020 to January 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Only the right eyes were included. The participants were allocated into two groups: the trial lens-fitting group (n = 41) and the software-fitting group (n = 48). The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corneal topography, and ocular health (Efron grading scales) were recorded at baseline, one week, two weeks, one, three, six, and 12 months afterthe initiation of lens wear. The axial length and endothelial cell density were assessed at baseline and after 12 months of lens wear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of the first fit in the software-fitting group and trial lens-fitting group reached 98 % and 95 %, respectively. The difference in UCVA and corneal staining were statistically insignificant between the two groups during all visits. The software-fitting group exhibited a smaller treatment zone size (radius 1.69 ± 0.21 mm vs 1.81 ± 0.16 mm, p = 0.004; area 9.13 ± 2.15 mm<sup>2</sup> vs 10.36 ± 1.82 mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.005) and less decentration (0.58 ± 0.31 mm vs 0.74 ± 0.39 mm, p = 0.036) compared with the trial lens-fitting group. There were no significant differences in axial elongation (0.15 ± 0.12 mm vs. 0.17 ± 0.14 mm, p = 0.534) or changes in endothelial cell density (-36.63 ± 99.37/mm<sup>2</sup> vs - 13.71 ± 87.72/mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.256) between the software-fitting group and the trial lens-fitting group at one-year follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both fitting methods were effective and safe. However, the software-fitting method resulted in a smaller treatment zone size and less decentration.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102334"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of trial lens-fitting and software-fitting in orthokeratology for myopia control in children with high corneal eccentric value.\",\"authors\":\"Liuyun Chong, Ziwen Sun, Yanling Wang, Tianpu Gu, Weiping Lin, Bei Du, Ruihua Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of the trial lens-fitting and software-fitting in orthokeratology for myopia control in children with high corneal eccentric value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Myopic children with high corneal eccentric value (≥0.65) receiving treatment for orthokeratology from July 2020 to January 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Only the right eyes were included. The participants were allocated into two groups: the trial lens-fitting group (n = 41) and the software-fitting group (n = 48). The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corneal topography, and ocular health (Efron grading scales) were recorded at baseline, one week, two weeks, one, three, six, and 12 months afterthe initiation of lens wear. The axial length and endothelial cell density were assessed at baseline and after 12 months of lens wear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of the first fit in the software-fitting group and trial lens-fitting group reached 98 % and 95 %, respectively. The difference in UCVA and corneal staining were statistically insignificant between the two groups during all visits. The software-fitting group exhibited a smaller treatment zone size (radius 1.69 ± 0.21 mm vs 1.81 ± 0.16 mm, p = 0.004; area 9.13 ± 2.15 mm<sup>2</sup> vs 10.36 ± 1.82 mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.005) and less decentration (0.58 ± 0.31 mm vs 0.74 ± 0.39 mm, p = 0.036) compared with the trial lens-fitting group. There were no significant differences in axial elongation (0.15 ± 0.12 mm vs. 0.17 ± 0.14 mm, p = 0.534) or changes in endothelial cell density (-36.63 ± 99.37/mm<sup>2</sup> vs - 13.71 ± 87.72/mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.256) between the software-fitting group and the trial lens-fitting group at one-year follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both fitting methods were effective and safe. However, the software-fitting method resulted in a smaller treatment zone size and less decentration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102334\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较角膜偏心值高的近视儿童在角膜矫形术中试戴镜片验配和软件验配控制近视的安全性和有效性:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 1 月期间接受角膜塑形镜治疗的高角膜偏心值(≥0.65)近视儿童。研究对象仅包括右眼。参与者被分为两组:试戴镜片组(41 人)和软件验配组(48 人)。分别记录了配戴镜片后基线、一周、两周、一周、三周、六个月和十二个月的未矫正视力(UCVA)、角膜地形图和眼部健康状况(Efron评分表)。在基线和配戴镜片 12 个月后对轴向长度和内皮细胞密度进行了评估:结果:软件验配组和试戴组的首次验配成功率分别达到 98% 和 95%。在所有检查中,两组 UCVA 和角膜染色的差异均无统计学意义。与试戴镜片组相比,软件验配组的治疗区域更小(半径 1.69 ± 0.21 mm vs 1.81 ± 0.16 mm,p = 0.004;面积 9.13 ± 2.15 mm2 vs 10.36 ± 1.82 mm2,p = 0.005),分散度更低(0.58 ± 0.31 mm vs 0.74 ± 0.39 mm,p = 0.036)。在一年的随访中,软件验配组与试验镜片验配组的轴向伸长率(0.15 ± 0.12 mm vs. 0.17 ± 0.14 mm,p = 0.534)和内皮细胞密度变化(-36.63 ± 99.37/mm2 vs - 13.71 ± 87.72/mm2,p = 0.256)无明显差异:结论:两种验配方法都有效且安全。结论:两种验配方法都有效且安全,但软件验配法的治疗区更小,分散程度更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of trial lens-fitting and software-fitting in orthokeratology for myopia control in children with high corneal eccentric value.

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of the trial lens-fitting and software-fitting in orthokeratology for myopia control in children with high corneal eccentric value.

Methods: Myopic children with high corneal eccentric value (≥0.65) receiving treatment for orthokeratology from July 2020 to January 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Only the right eyes were included. The participants were allocated into two groups: the trial lens-fitting group (n = 41) and the software-fitting group (n = 48). The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corneal topography, and ocular health (Efron grading scales) were recorded at baseline, one week, two weeks, one, three, six, and 12 months afterthe initiation of lens wear. The axial length and endothelial cell density were assessed at baseline and after 12 months of lens wear.

Results: The success rate of the first fit in the software-fitting group and trial lens-fitting group reached 98 % and 95 %, respectively. The difference in UCVA and corneal staining were statistically insignificant between the two groups during all visits. The software-fitting group exhibited a smaller treatment zone size (radius 1.69 ± 0.21 mm vs 1.81 ± 0.16 mm, p = 0.004; area 9.13 ± 2.15 mm2 vs 10.36 ± 1.82 mm2, p = 0.005) and less decentration (0.58 ± 0.31 mm vs 0.74 ± 0.39 mm, p = 0.036) compared with the trial lens-fitting group. There were no significant differences in axial elongation (0.15 ± 0.12 mm vs. 0.17 ± 0.14 mm, p = 0.534) or changes in endothelial cell density (-36.63 ± 99.37/mm2 vs - 13.71 ± 87.72/mm2, p = 0.256) between the software-fitting group and the trial lens-fitting group at one-year follow-up visit.

Conclusion: Both fitting methods were effective and safe. However, the software-fitting method resulted in a smaller treatment zone size and less decentration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
期刊最新文献
Validation and repeatability assessment of the Chinese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), 5-item dry eye (DEQ-5), and contact lens dry eye questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) questionnaires. Artificial intelligence-assisted fitting method using corneal topography outcomes enhances success rate in orthokeratology lens fitting. Randomised controlled trial on effects of topical insulin compared to artificial tears and normal saline on tear inflammatory mediator levels and clinical parameters in diabetics with dry eye disease. Development and evaluation of ocular antibiotic-loaded soluble film inserts. Digital eye strain and clinical correlates in older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1