儿科初级保健中远程医疗和亲诊的医疗利用率。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4156
Scott D Casey, Jie Huang, Daniel D Parry, Tracy A Lieu, Mary E Reed
{"title":"儿科初级保健中远程医疗和亲诊的医疗利用率。","authors":"Scott D Casey, Jie Huang, Daniel D Parry, Tracy A Lieu, Mary E Reed","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Telemedicine is an increasingly used yet understudied vehicle to deliver pediatric primary care. Evidence detailing downstream health care utilization after telemedicine visits is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pediatric primary care conducted via telemedicine (video or telephone) with in-person office visits with regard to physician medication prescribing and imaging and laboratory ordering and downstream follow-up office visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study included all patients younger than 18 years who had scheduled primary care appointments with a pediatrician from January 1 to December 31, 2022, in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health system, a large integrated health care delivery system offering in-person office visits, video visits, or telephone visits for pediatric primary care.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Pediatric primary care in-person visit, telephone visit, or video visit.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Rates of physician medication prescribing and imaging and laboratory ordering during an index telemedicine or office visit and rates of in-person office visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 7 days after the visit, adjusted for patient and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 782 596 total appointments (51.1% male) among 438 638 patients, telemedicine was used for 332 153 visits (42.4%). After adjustment, there was more medication prescribing for in-person visits (39.8%) compared with video visits (29.5%; adjusted difference, -10.3%; 95% CI, -10.6% to -10.0%) or telephone visits (27.3%; adjusted difference, -12.5%; 95% CI, -12.5% to -12.7%). There was also more laboratory ordering for in-person visits (24.6%) compared with video visits (7.8%; adjusted difference, -16.8%; 95% CI, -17.0% to -16.6%) or telephone visits (8.5%; adjusted difference, -16.2%; 95% CI, -16.3% to -16.0%). There was more imaging ordering for in-person visits (8.5%) compared with video visits (4.0%; adjusted difference, -4.5%; 95% CI, -4.6% to -4.4%) and telephone visits (3.5%; adjusted difference, -5.0%; 95% CI, -5.1% to -4.9%). After adjustment, fewer in-person follow up visits occurred for index visits that were in-person (4.3%) compared with video (14.4%; adjusted difference, 10.1%; 95% CI, 9.9%-10.3%) or telephone (15.1%; adjusted difference, 10.8%; 95% CI, 10.7%-11.0%) visits. The rate of ED visits following an in-person visit was slightly lower (1.75%) compared with after video visits (2.04%; adjusted difference, 0.29%; 95% CI, 0.21%-0.38%) or telephone visits (2.00%; adjusted difference, 0.25%; 95% CI, 0.18%-0.33%). There was no statistically significant difference in the 7-day rate of hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, telephone and video visits for pediatric primary care were associated with less prescribing and ordering than in-person visits. Telemedicine visits were associated with modestly higher rates of subsequent in-person visits and slightly higher rates of ED visits, and there was no difference in hospitalizations. Telemedicine appears to be a useful vehicle for health care delivery in the pediatric population, although it is not a universal substitute for in-person visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 11","pages":"e244156"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Care Utilization With Telemedicine and In-Person Visits in Pediatric Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Scott D Casey, Jie Huang, Daniel D Parry, Tracy A Lieu, Mary E Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Telemedicine is an increasingly used yet understudied vehicle to deliver pediatric primary care. Evidence detailing downstream health care utilization after telemedicine visits is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pediatric primary care conducted via telemedicine (video or telephone) with in-person office visits with regard to physician medication prescribing and imaging and laboratory ordering and downstream follow-up office visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study included all patients younger than 18 years who had scheduled primary care appointments with a pediatrician from January 1 to December 31, 2022, in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health system, a large integrated health care delivery system offering in-person office visits, video visits, or telephone visits for pediatric primary care.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Pediatric primary care in-person visit, telephone visit, or video visit.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Rates of physician medication prescribing and imaging and laboratory ordering during an index telemedicine or office visit and rates of in-person office visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 7 days after the visit, adjusted for patient and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 782 596 total appointments (51.1% male) among 438 638 patients, telemedicine was used for 332 153 visits (42.4%). After adjustment, there was more medication prescribing for in-person visits (39.8%) compared with video visits (29.5%; adjusted difference, -10.3%; 95% CI, -10.6% to -10.0%) or telephone visits (27.3%; adjusted difference, -12.5%; 95% CI, -12.5% to -12.7%). There was also more laboratory ordering for in-person visits (24.6%) compared with video visits (7.8%; adjusted difference, -16.8%; 95% CI, -17.0% to -16.6%) or telephone visits (8.5%; adjusted difference, -16.2%; 95% CI, -16.3% to -16.0%). There was more imaging ordering for in-person visits (8.5%) compared with video visits (4.0%; adjusted difference, -4.5%; 95% CI, -4.6% to -4.4%) and telephone visits (3.5%; adjusted difference, -5.0%; 95% CI, -5.1% to -4.9%). After adjustment, fewer in-person follow up visits occurred for index visits that were in-person (4.3%) compared with video (14.4%; adjusted difference, 10.1%; 95% CI, 9.9%-10.3%) or telephone (15.1%; adjusted difference, 10.8%; 95% CI, 10.7%-11.0%) visits. The rate of ED visits following an in-person visit was slightly lower (1.75%) compared with after video visits (2.04%; adjusted difference, 0.29%; 95% CI, 0.21%-0.38%) or telephone visits (2.00%; adjusted difference, 0.25%; 95% CI, 0.18%-0.33%). There was no statistically significant difference in the 7-day rate of hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, telephone and video visits for pediatric primary care were associated with less prescribing and ordering than in-person visits. Telemedicine visits were associated with modestly higher rates of subsequent in-person visits and slightly higher rates of ED visits, and there was no difference in hospitalizations. Telemedicine appears to be a useful vehicle for health care delivery in the pediatric population, although it is not a universal substitute for in-person visits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"5 11\",\"pages\":\"e244156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584922/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:远程医疗在提供儿科初级保健服务方面的应用日益广泛,但研究不足。需要有证据详细说明远程医疗访问后下游医疗保健的利用情况:目的:比较通过远程医疗(视频或电话)进行的儿科初级保健与亲自到诊所就诊在医生开药、影像和实验室检查以及下游后续诊所就诊、急诊室就诊和住院方面的情况:这项队列研究包括 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间在北加州凯撒医疗系统(Kaiser Permanente Northern California health system)中与儿科医生预约初级保健的所有 18 岁以下患者,该医疗系统是一个大型综合医疗服务系统,提供儿科初级保健的面对面门诊、视频门诊或电话门诊:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果和测量指标:根据患者和临床特征进行调整后,远程医疗或诊室就诊期间医生开药、影像和实验室检查的比例,以及就诊后 7 天内的亲自诊室就诊率、急诊室就诊率和住院率:在 438 638 名患者的 782 596 次预约中(51.1% 为男性),332 153 次就诊使用了远程医疗(42.4%)。经调整后,与视频就诊(29.5%;调整后差异为-10.3%;95% CI,-10.6%至-10.0%)或电话就诊(27.3%;调整后差异为-12.5%;95% CI,-12.5%至-12.7%)相比,亲自就诊(39.8%)的处方用药量更大。与视频就诊(7.8%;调整后差异为-16.8%;95% CI,-17.0%至-16.6%)或电话就诊(8.5%;调整后差异为-16.2%;95% CI,-16.3%至-16.0%)相比,亲自就诊(24.6%)的化验订单也更多。与视频就诊(4.0%;调整后差异为-4.5%;95% CI,-4.6%至-4.4%)和电话就诊(3.5%;调整后差异为-5.0%;95% CI,-5.1%至-4.9%)相比,亲自就诊(8.5%)的影像学检查订单更多。经调整后,与视频(14.4%;调整后差异为 10.1%;95% CI,9.9%-10.3%)或电话(15.1%;调整后差异为 10.8%;95% CI,10.7%-11.0%)就诊相比,当面就诊的指数随访率(4.3%)更低。与视频就诊(2.04%;调整后差异为 0.29%;95% CI 为 0.21%-0.38%)或电话就诊(2.00%;调整后差异为 0.25%;95% CI 为 0.18%-0.33%)相比,面对面就诊后的急诊就诊率略低(1.75%)。在 7 天住院率方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异:在这项队列研究中,儿科初级保健的电话和视频就诊与亲自就诊相比,开处方和下订单的情况较少。远程医疗就诊与随后的亲自就诊率略高和急诊室就诊率略高有关,但住院率没有差异。远程医疗似乎是为儿科人群提供医疗服务的有用工具,尽管它并不能完全替代面对面就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Care Utilization With Telemedicine and In-Person Visits in Pediatric Primary Care.

Importance: Telemedicine is an increasingly used yet understudied vehicle to deliver pediatric primary care. Evidence detailing downstream health care utilization after telemedicine visits is needed.

Objective: To compare pediatric primary care conducted via telemedicine (video or telephone) with in-person office visits with regard to physician medication prescribing and imaging and laboratory ordering and downstream follow-up office visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included all patients younger than 18 years who had scheduled primary care appointments with a pediatrician from January 1 to December 31, 2022, in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health system, a large integrated health care delivery system offering in-person office visits, video visits, or telephone visits for pediatric primary care.

Exposure: Pediatric primary care in-person visit, telephone visit, or video visit.

Main outcome and measures: Rates of physician medication prescribing and imaging and laboratory ordering during an index telemedicine or office visit and rates of in-person office visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 7 days after the visit, adjusted for patient and clinical characteristics.

Results: Of 782 596 total appointments (51.1% male) among 438 638 patients, telemedicine was used for 332 153 visits (42.4%). After adjustment, there was more medication prescribing for in-person visits (39.8%) compared with video visits (29.5%; adjusted difference, -10.3%; 95% CI, -10.6% to -10.0%) or telephone visits (27.3%; adjusted difference, -12.5%; 95% CI, -12.5% to -12.7%). There was also more laboratory ordering for in-person visits (24.6%) compared with video visits (7.8%; adjusted difference, -16.8%; 95% CI, -17.0% to -16.6%) or telephone visits (8.5%; adjusted difference, -16.2%; 95% CI, -16.3% to -16.0%). There was more imaging ordering for in-person visits (8.5%) compared with video visits (4.0%; adjusted difference, -4.5%; 95% CI, -4.6% to -4.4%) and telephone visits (3.5%; adjusted difference, -5.0%; 95% CI, -5.1% to -4.9%). After adjustment, fewer in-person follow up visits occurred for index visits that were in-person (4.3%) compared with video (14.4%; adjusted difference, 10.1%; 95% CI, 9.9%-10.3%) or telephone (15.1%; adjusted difference, 10.8%; 95% CI, 10.7%-11.0%) visits. The rate of ED visits following an in-person visit was slightly lower (1.75%) compared with after video visits (2.04%; adjusted difference, 0.29%; 95% CI, 0.21%-0.38%) or telephone visits (2.00%; adjusted difference, 0.25%; 95% CI, 0.18%-0.33%). There was no statistically significant difference in the 7-day rate of hospitalizations.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, telephone and video visits for pediatric primary care were associated with less prescribing and ordering than in-person visits. Telemedicine visits were associated with modestly higher rates of subsequent in-person visits and slightly higher rates of ED visits, and there was no difference in hospitalizations. Telemedicine appears to be a useful vehicle for health care delivery in the pediatric population, although it is not a universal substitute for in-person visits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Cannabis Use During Early Pregnancy Following Recreational Cannabis Legalization. Change of Ownership and Quality of Home Health Agency Care. Errors in Conflict of Interest Disclosures. JAMA Health Forum. Surgeon Workforce in Underserved Communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1