全科医生支持患者使用在线服务:重点人种学案例研究。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0137
Jennifer Newbould, Carol Bryce, Stephanie Stockwell, Bethan Mair Treadgold, John Campbell, Christine Marriott, Emma Pitchforth, Laura Sheard, Rachel Winder, Helen Atherton
{"title":"全科医生支持患者使用在线服务:重点人种学案例研究。","authors":"Jennifer Newbould, Carol Bryce, Stephanie Stockwell, Bethan Mair Treadgold, John Campbell, Christine Marriott, Emma Pitchforth, Laura Sheard, Rachel Winder, Helen Atherton","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background In England online services in general practice encompass a range of provision from ordering repeat medication to having a consultation. Some groups of individuals may find accessing and/or using such services difficult and may require 'digital facilitation', that is the range of processes, procedures, and personnel which seeks to support NHS patients in their uptake and use of online services. Aim To gain insight, from the perspective of general practice staff and patients/carers, into how and why digital facilitation might lead to benefits, and the key processes involved in supporting patients to use online services. Design and setting Eight general practices across England with varied geographical and socio-demographic characteristics. Methods Focused ethnographic case study of observations and interviews (n=69). Results Typically, digital facilitation was delivered in an ad hoc fashion to individual patients. Online services were delivered via multiple systems each working differently, and creating a need for support so that patients could access them. Younger practice staff were expected to deliver support on account of their age, despite there being no evidence of age-related training and experience. It was understood by practice staff that patients with challenging personal circumstances may require specific support to access online services. Conclusion At present patient use of online services is supported by digital facilitation which is primarily delivered by reception staff. Supporting patients to use online services requires review of how many services are provided and what for, and consideration for the time and effort needed to support patients to use them.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Newbould, Carol Bryce, Stephanie Stockwell, Bethan Mair Treadgold, John Campbell, Christine Marriott, Emma Pitchforth, Laura Sheard, Rachel Winder, Helen Atherton\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background In England online services in general practice encompass a range of provision from ordering repeat medication to having a consultation. Some groups of individuals may find accessing and/or using such services difficult and may require 'digital facilitation', that is the range of processes, procedures, and personnel which seeks to support NHS patients in their uptake and use of online services. Aim To gain insight, from the perspective of general practice staff and patients/carers, into how and why digital facilitation might lead to benefits, and the key processes involved in supporting patients to use online services. Design and setting Eight general practices across England with varied geographical and socio-demographic characteristics. Methods Focused ethnographic case study of observations and interviews (n=69). Results Typically, digital facilitation was delivered in an ad hoc fashion to individual patients. Online services were delivered via multiple systems each working differently, and creating a need for support so that patients could access them. Younger practice staff were expected to deliver support on account of their age, despite there being no evidence of age-related training and experience. It was understood by practice staff that patients with challenging personal circumstances may require specific support to access online services. Conclusion At present patient use of online services is supported by digital facilitation which is primarily delivered by reception staff. Supporting patients to use online services requires review of how many services are provided and what for, and consideration for the time and effort needed to support patients to use them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 在英格兰,全科在线服务包括从订购重复用药到咨询等一系列服务。有些群体可能会发现获取和/或使用此类服务有困难,因此可能需要 "数字便利",即一系列流程、程序和人员,以帮助国民医疗服务系统的患者获取和使用在线服务。目的 从全科医生和患者/护理人员的角度,深入了解数字便利化如何及为何能带来益处,以及支持患者使用在线服务所涉及的关键流程。设计和背景 英国各地的八家综合诊所,具有不同的地理和社会人口特征。方法 通过观察和访谈进行重点人种学案例研究(n=69)。结果 通常情况下,数字便利服务是以临时方式提供给个别患者的。在线服务通过多个系统提供,每个系统的工作方式各不相同,因此患者需要得到支持才能使用这些服务。尽管没有证据表明年轻的医务人员接受过与年龄相关的培训并拥有丰富的经验,但年轻的医务人员因其年龄而被期望提供支持。据诊所工作人员了解,个人情况具有挑战性的患者在使用在线服务时可能需要特殊支持。结论 目前,患者使用在线服务主要依靠接待人员提供的数字支持。要支持患者使用在线服务,就需要对提供服务的数量和内容进行审查,并考虑支持患者使用这些服务所需的时间和精力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study.

Background In England online services in general practice encompass a range of provision from ordering repeat medication to having a consultation. Some groups of individuals may find accessing and/or using such services difficult and may require 'digital facilitation', that is the range of processes, procedures, and personnel which seeks to support NHS patients in their uptake and use of online services. Aim To gain insight, from the perspective of general practice staff and patients/carers, into how and why digital facilitation might lead to benefits, and the key processes involved in supporting patients to use online services. Design and setting Eight general practices across England with varied geographical and socio-demographic characteristics. Methods Focused ethnographic case study of observations and interviews (n=69). Results Typically, digital facilitation was delivered in an ad hoc fashion to individual patients. Online services were delivered via multiple systems each working differently, and creating a need for support so that patients could access them. Younger practice staff were expected to deliver support on account of their age, despite there being no evidence of age-related training and experience. It was understood by practice staff that patients with challenging personal circumstances may require specific support to access online services. Conclusion At present patient use of online services is supported by digital facilitation which is primarily delivered by reception staff. Supporting patients to use online services requires review of how many services are provided and what for, and consideration for the time and effort needed to support patients to use them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme uptake, patient satisfaction, and QOF achievement: an ecological study from 2020-2023. Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020). Improving personal continuity in general practice: a focus group study. The association between cancer risk assessment tool use and GP consultation duration: an observational study. Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1