利用机载激光扫描数据时间序列确定场地指数

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100268
Maria Åsnes Moan, Ole Martin Bollandsås, Svetlana Saarela, Terje Gobakken, Erik Næsset, Hans Ole Ørka, Lennart Noordermeer
{"title":"利用机载激光扫描数据时间序列确定场地指数","authors":"Maria Åsnes Moan, Ole Martin Bollandsås, Svetlana Saarela, Terje Gobakken, Erik Næsset, Hans Ole Ørka, Lennart Noordermeer","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Site index (SI) is determined from the top height development and is a proxy for forest productivity, defined as the expected top height for a given species at a certain index age. In Norway, an index age of 40 years is used. By using bi-temporal airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, SI can be determined using models estimated from SI observed on field plots (the direct approach) or from predicted top heights at two points in time (the height differential approach). Time series of ALS data may enhance SI determination compared to conventional methods used in operational forest inventory by providing more detailed information about the top height development. We used longitudinal data comprising spatially consistent field and ALS data collected from training plots in 1999, 2010, and 2022 to determine SI using the direct and height differential approaches using all combinations of years and performed an external validation. We also evaluated the use of data assimilation. Values of root mean square error obtained from external validation were in the ranges of 16.3%–21.4% and 12.8%–20.6% of the mean field-registered SI for the direct approach and the height differential approach, respectively. There were no statistically significant effects of time series length or the number of points in time on the obtained accuracies. Data assimilation did not result in any substantial improvement in the obtained accuracies. Although a time series of ALS data did not yield greater accuracies compared to using only two points in time, a larger proportion of the study area could be used in ALS-based determination of SI when a time series was available. This was because areas that were unsuitable for SI determination between two points in time could be subject to SI determination based on data from another part of the time series.","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Site index determination using a time series of airborne laser scanning data\",\"authors\":\"Maria Åsnes Moan, Ole Martin Bollandsås, Svetlana Saarela, Terje Gobakken, Erik Næsset, Hans Ole Ørka, Lennart Noordermeer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Site index (SI) is determined from the top height development and is a proxy for forest productivity, defined as the expected top height for a given species at a certain index age. In Norway, an index age of 40 years is used. By using bi-temporal airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, SI can be determined using models estimated from SI observed on field plots (the direct approach) or from predicted top heights at two points in time (the height differential approach). Time series of ALS data may enhance SI determination compared to conventional methods used in operational forest inventory by providing more detailed information about the top height development. We used longitudinal data comprising spatially consistent field and ALS data collected from training plots in 1999, 2010, and 2022 to determine SI using the direct and height differential approaches using all combinations of years and performed an external validation. We also evaluated the use of data assimilation. Values of root mean square error obtained from external validation were in the ranges of 16.3%–21.4% and 12.8%–20.6% of the mean field-registered SI for the direct approach and the height differential approach, respectively. There were no statistically significant effects of time series length or the number of points in time on the obtained accuracies. Data assimilation did not result in any substantial improvement in the obtained accuracies. Although a time series of ALS data did not yield greater accuracies compared to using only two points in time, a larger proportion of the study area could be used in ALS-based determination of SI when a time series was available. This was because areas that were unsuitable for SI determination between two points in time could be subject to SI determination based on data from another part of the time series.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100268\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100268","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

林地指数(SI)是根据顶高发展确定的,是森林生产力的代用指标,定义为特定树种在一定指数龄期的预期顶高。挪威采用的指数年龄为 40 年。通过使用双时相机载激光扫描(ALS)数据,可以使用从实地小块观察到的 SI(直接方法)或从两个时间点的预测顶高(高度差方法)估算出的模型来确定 SI。与作业森林资源清查中使用的传统方法相比,ALS 数据的时间序列可提供有关顶高发展的更详细信息,从而提高 SI 测定的准确性。我们使用了由 1999 年、2010 年和 2022 年从训练地块收集的空间一致的实地数据和 ALS 数据组成的纵向数据,使用直接法和高度差法确定了所有年份组合的 SI,并进行了外部验证。我们还评估了数据同化的使用情况。外部验证得出的均方根误差值分别为直接法和高差法实地登记 SI 平均值的 16.3%-21.4% 和 12.8%-20.6% 之间。时间序列长度或时间点数量对获得的精度没有明显的统计学影响。数据同化并没有使获得的精确度有实质性提高。虽然与仅使用两个时间点相比,ALS 数据的时间序列并没有产生更高的精度,但如果有时间序列,则有更大比例的研究区域可用于基于 ALS 的 SI 测定。这是因为在两个时间点之间不适合测定 SI 的区域可以根据时间序列另一部分的数据来测定 SI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Site index determination using a time series of airborne laser scanning data
Site index (SI) is determined from the top height development and is a proxy for forest productivity, defined as the expected top height for a given species at a certain index age. In Norway, an index age of 40 years is used. By using bi-temporal airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, SI can be determined using models estimated from SI observed on field plots (the direct approach) or from predicted top heights at two points in time (the height differential approach). Time series of ALS data may enhance SI determination compared to conventional methods used in operational forest inventory by providing more detailed information about the top height development. We used longitudinal data comprising spatially consistent field and ALS data collected from training plots in 1999, 2010, and 2022 to determine SI using the direct and height differential approaches using all combinations of years and performed an external validation. We also evaluated the use of data assimilation. Values of root mean square error obtained from external validation were in the ranges of 16.3%–21.4% and 12.8%–20.6% of the mean field-registered SI for the direct approach and the height differential approach, respectively. There were no statistically significant effects of time series length or the number of points in time on the obtained accuracies. Data assimilation did not result in any substantial improvement in the obtained accuracies. Although a time series of ALS data did not yield greater accuracies compared to using only two points in time, a larger proportion of the study area could be used in ALS-based determination of SI when a time series was available. This was because areas that were unsuitable for SI determination between two points in time could be subject to SI determination based on data from another part of the time series.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Drivers and patterns of community completeness suggest that Tuscan Fagus sylvatica forests can naturally have a low plant diversity Site-specific patterns of fine root biomass formation across European coniferous forests Site index determination using a time series of airborne laser scanning data Late spring-early summer drought and soil properties jointly modulate two pine species' decline and climatic sensitivity in temperate Northern China Tree growth decline to warm-wet conditions in boreal forests is linked to stand density
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1