Akihiro Matsukawa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Marcin Miszczyk, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Tamás Fazekas, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Jakob Klemm, Robert Schulz, Anna Cadenar, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Paweł Rajwa, Keiichiro Mori, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura, Shahrokh F Shariat
{"title":"肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的三联疗法与根治性膀胱切除术：配对队列研究的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Akihiro Matsukawa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Marcin Miszczyk, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Tamás Fazekas, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Jakob Klemm, Robert Schulz, Anna Cadenar, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Paweł Rajwa, Keiichiro Mori, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). It is highly invasive and associated with perioperative risks, while bladder-preserving trimodality therapy (TMT) offers a less invasive alternative with preferable quality of life for selected patients. We aimed to compare oncological outcomes of TMT and RC in MIBC patients, and evaluate TMT-specific outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In December 2023, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies on MIBC patients treated with TMT. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between MIBC patients treated with TMT and RC, utilizing hazard ratios (HRs). We included only matched cohort studies to minimize selection bias. TMT-specific outcomes, such as response, recurrence, and toxicity rates, were pooled separately.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Eighty-seven studies (n = 28 218) were identified. No significant differences in OS (HR: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.40) and CSS (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.58) were found for TMT compared with RC. In patients treated with TMT, the complete response was achieved in 74.4% (95% CI: 69.1-79.1), the estimated rate of intravesical recurrence was 23.1% (95% CI: 19.0-27.7), and the rate of grade ≥3 acute toxicity was 11.4% (95% CI: 4.0-28.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The oncological outcomes of TMT were comparable with those of RC, with an acceptable toxicity profile. TMT appears as a safe and effective treatment for appropriately selected MIBC patients who want to preserve their bladder. However, evidence from high-volume controlled trials is needed.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Well-selected patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be treated with \"trimodality therapy\" to preserve the bladder. So far, the reported outcomes are comparable with those of radical surgery, and we found no signs of excess toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trimodality Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Matched Cohort Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Akihiro Matsukawa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Marcin Miszczyk, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Tamás Fazekas, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Jakob Klemm, Robert Schulz, Anna Cadenar, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Paweł Rajwa, Keiichiro Mori, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura, Shahrokh F Shariat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). It is highly invasive and associated with perioperative risks, while bladder-preserving trimodality therapy (TMT) offers a less invasive alternative with preferable quality of life for selected patients. We aimed to compare oncological outcomes of TMT and RC in MIBC patients, and evaluate TMT-specific outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In December 2023, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies on MIBC patients treated with TMT. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between MIBC patients treated with TMT and RC, utilizing hazard ratios (HRs). We included only matched cohort studies to minimize selection bias. TMT-specific outcomes, such as response, recurrence, and toxicity rates, were pooled separately.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Eighty-seven studies (n = 28 218) were identified. No significant differences in OS (HR: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.40) and CSS (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.58) were found for TMT compared with RC. In patients treated with TMT, the complete response was achieved in 74.4% (95% CI: 69.1-79.1), the estimated rate of intravesical recurrence was 23.1% (95% CI: 19.0-27.7), and the rate of grade ≥3 acute toxicity was 11.4% (95% CI: 4.0-28.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The oncological outcomes of TMT were comparable with those of RC, with an acceptable toxicity profile. TMT appears as a safe and effective treatment for appropriately selected MIBC patients who want to preserve their bladder. However, evidence from high-volume controlled trials is needed.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Well-selected patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be treated with \\\"trimodality therapy\\\" to preserve the bladder. So far, the reported outcomes are comparable with those of radical surgery, and we found no signs of excess toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trimodality Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Matched Cohort Studies.
Background and objective: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). It is highly invasive and associated with perioperative risks, while bladder-preserving trimodality therapy (TMT) offers a less invasive alternative with preferable quality of life for selected patients. We aimed to compare oncological outcomes of TMT and RC in MIBC patients, and evaluate TMT-specific outcomes.
Methods: In December 2023, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies on MIBC patients treated with TMT. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between MIBC patients treated with TMT and RC, utilizing hazard ratios (HRs). We included only matched cohort studies to minimize selection bias. TMT-specific outcomes, such as response, recurrence, and toxicity rates, were pooled separately.
Key findings and limitations: Eighty-seven studies (n = 28 218) were identified. No significant differences in OS (HR: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.40) and CSS (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.58) were found for TMT compared with RC. In patients treated with TMT, the complete response was achieved in 74.4% (95% CI: 69.1-79.1), the estimated rate of intravesical recurrence was 23.1% (95% CI: 19.0-27.7), and the rate of grade ≥3 acute toxicity was 11.4% (95% CI: 4.0-28.4).
Conclusions and clinical implications: The oncological outcomes of TMT were comparable with those of RC, with an acceptable toxicity profile. TMT appears as a safe and effective treatment for appropriately selected MIBC patients who want to preserve their bladder. However, evidence from high-volume controlled trials is needed.
Patient summary: Well-selected patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be treated with "trimodality therapy" to preserve the bladder. So far, the reported outcomes are comparable with those of radical surgery, and we found no signs of excess toxicity.
期刊介绍：
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
