女性在修复复杂主动脉瘤后的发病率和死亡率较高,原因是症状不明显和动脉瘤更广泛。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.016
Whitney L Teagle, Andrew S Warren, Marc Schermerhorn, Thomas F O'Donnell, Elina Quiroga, Kirsten D Dansey, Sara L Zettervall
{"title":"女性在修复复杂主动脉瘤后的发病率和死亡率较高,原因是症状不明显和动脉瘤更广泛。","authors":"Whitney L Teagle, Andrew S Warren, Marc Schermerhorn, Thomas F O'Donnell, Elina Quiroga, Kirsten D Dansey, Sara L Zettervall","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prior studies have found disparities in outcomes by sex following repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, little is known about the disparities in outcomes following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. This study aims to assess differences in presentation and outcomes by sex following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients treated via endovascular approach for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms treated in the Vascular Quality Initiative database from 2014-2022 were included. Demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were compared by sex. Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival were then assessed using univariable and adjusted analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4671 patients were treated for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, including 74% men and 26% women. Women had higher rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (46% vs. 38%, p<0.001), but lower rates of coronary artery disease (20% vs. 32%, p<0.001) and lower baseline creatinine (0.9 vs. 1.1, p<0.001). Women more commonly presented symptomatic (18% vs. 9%), ruptured (2.9% vs. 2.0%), and had more thoracoabdominal aneurysms (vs. juxtarenal) (38% vs. 26%) on presentation than men (all p<0.001). Women had higher thirty-day mortality (5.2% vs. 2.8%, p<0.001) and long-term mortality (p<0.001) compared to men. This trend persisted after adjustment for thirty-day mortality (OR 1.5, CI: 1.0-2.2) but not long-term survival (HR 1.2, CI: 0.96-1.4). Prior to adjustment, major morbidities were also more common among women, including cardiac complications (12% vs. 10%, p=0.024), respiratory complications (7.0% vs. 4.2%, p<0.001), intestinal ischemia (2.8% vs. 1.5%, p=0.005), stroke (2.6% vs. 1.2%, p=0.002), and spinal cord ischemia (5.3% vs. 3.3%, p=0.002). Prolonged length of stay exceeding 7 days was also more common among women (25% vs. 14%, p<0.001). Only prolonged length of stay (OR 1.7, CI: 1.4-2.1) was more common among women following adjustment. Rather, non-elective repair (OR 1.9, CI: 1.5-2.3) and thoracoabdominal extent (OR 1.3, CI: 1.1-1.6) was associated with late mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women experience higher morbidity and mortality following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, primarily due to urgent presentations and more extensive aneurysms at time of repair. These findings highlight the critical need for improved screening and earlier intervention in women, which may help mitigate this inequality and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women have Higher Morbidity and Mortality Following Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms Due to Symptomatic Presentation and More Extensive Aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Whitney L Teagle, Andrew S Warren, Marc Schermerhorn, Thomas F O'Donnell, Elina Quiroga, Kirsten D Dansey, Sara L Zettervall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prior studies have found disparities in outcomes by sex following repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, little is known about the disparities in outcomes following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. This study aims to assess differences in presentation and outcomes by sex following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients treated via endovascular approach for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms treated in the Vascular Quality Initiative database from 2014-2022 were included. Demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were compared by sex. Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival were then assessed using univariable and adjusted analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4671 patients were treated for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, including 74% men and 26% women. Women had higher rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (46% vs. 38%, p<0.001), but lower rates of coronary artery disease (20% vs. 32%, p<0.001) and lower baseline creatinine (0.9 vs. 1.1, p<0.001). Women more commonly presented symptomatic (18% vs. 9%), ruptured (2.9% vs. 2.0%), and had more thoracoabdominal aneurysms (vs. juxtarenal) (38% vs. 26%) on presentation than men (all p<0.001). Women had higher thirty-day mortality (5.2% vs. 2.8%, p<0.001) and long-term mortality (p<0.001) compared to men. This trend persisted after adjustment for thirty-day mortality (OR 1.5, CI: 1.0-2.2) but not long-term survival (HR 1.2, CI: 0.96-1.4). Prior to adjustment, major morbidities were also more common among women, including cardiac complications (12% vs. 10%, p=0.024), respiratory complications (7.0% vs. 4.2%, p<0.001), intestinal ischemia (2.8% vs. 1.5%, p=0.005), stroke (2.6% vs. 1.2%, p=0.002), and spinal cord ischemia (5.3% vs. 3.3%, p=0.002). Prolonged length of stay exceeding 7 days was also more common among women (25% vs. 14%, p<0.001). Only prolonged length of stay (OR 1.7, CI: 1.4-2.1) was more common among women following adjustment. Rather, non-elective repair (OR 1.9, CI: 1.5-2.3) and thoracoabdominal extent (OR 1.3, CI: 1.1-1.6) was associated with late mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women experience higher morbidity and mortality following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, primarily due to urgent presentations and more extensive aneurysms at time of repair. These findings highlight the critical need for improved screening and earlier intervention in women, which may help mitigate this inequality and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先前的研究发现,腹主动脉瘤修复术后的疗效因性别而存在差异。然而,人们对复杂腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后疗效的差异知之甚少。本研究旨在评估复杂腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后不同性别患者的表现和预后差异:方法:纳入2014-2022年血管质量倡议数据库中所有通过血管内方法治疗复杂腹主动脉瘤的患者。按性别比较了人口统计学、合并症和手术细节。然后使用单变量分析和调整分析评估围手术期结果和长期生存率:4671名复杂腹主动脉瘤患者接受了治疗,其中男性占74%,女性占26%。女性患慢性阻塞性肺病的比例更高(46% 对 38%,p 结论:女性的发病率和死亡率更高:复杂性腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后,女性的发病率和死亡率较高,这主要是由于女性急诊就医,且修复时动脉瘤的范围更广。这些发现凸显了对女性进行更好筛查和更早干预的迫切需要,这可能有助于缓解这种不平等并改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Women have Higher Morbidity and Mortality Following Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms Due to Symptomatic Presentation and More Extensive Aneurysms.

Objective: Prior studies have found disparities in outcomes by sex following repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, little is known about the disparities in outcomes following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. This study aims to assess differences in presentation and outcomes by sex following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Methods: All patients treated via endovascular approach for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms treated in the Vascular Quality Initiative database from 2014-2022 were included. Demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were compared by sex. Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival were then assessed using univariable and adjusted analysis.

Results: 4671 patients were treated for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, including 74% men and 26% women. Women had higher rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (46% vs. 38%, p<0.001), but lower rates of coronary artery disease (20% vs. 32%, p<0.001) and lower baseline creatinine (0.9 vs. 1.1, p<0.001). Women more commonly presented symptomatic (18% vs. 9%), ruptured (2.9% vs. 2.0%), and had more thoracoabdominal aneurysms (vs. juxtarenal) (38% vs. 26%) on presentation than men (all p<0.001). Women had higher thirty-day mortality (5.2% vs. 2.8%, p<0.001) and long-term mortality (p<0.001) compared to men. This trend persisted after adjustment for thirty-day mortality (OR 1.5, CI: 1.0-2.2) but not long-term survival (HR 1.2, CI: 0.96-1.4). Prior to adjustment, major morbidities were also more common among women, including cardiac complications (12% vs. 10%, p=0.024), respiratory complications (7.0% vs. 4.2%, p<0.001), intestinal ischemia (2.8% vs. 1.5%, p=0.005), stroke (2.6% vs. 1.2%, p=0.002), and spinal cord ischemia (5.3% vs. 3.3%, p=0.002). Prolonged length of stay exceeding 7 days was also more common among women (25% vs. 14%, p<0.001). Only prolonged length of stay (OR 1.7, CI: 1.4-2.1) was more common among women following adjustment. Rather, non-elective repair (OR 1.9, CI: 1.5-2.3) and thoracoabdominal extent (OR 1.3, CI: 1.1-1.6) was associated with late mortality.

Conclusions: Women experience higher morbidity and mortality following endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, primarily due to urgent presentations and more extensive aneurysms at time of repair. These findings highlight the critical need for improved screening and earlier intervention in women, which may help mitigate this inequality and improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
Detangling sex-based disparities in acute limb ischemia outcomes-Progress is being made, but we are behind the curve. Just because we can technically do something does not mean that we should. Off-the-shelf Gore thoracoabdominal multibranch endoprosthesis: How will it impact physician-modified endografts? Race and income do not affect ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment modality. Radiation-induced bilateral common carotid artery occlusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1