动静脉瘘血液透析患者上腔静脉和臂-脑静脉闭塞支架植入术的长期疗效。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102007
Florent Porez, Reuben Veerapen, Stéphanie Delelis, Sarah Kirat, Eric Braunberger, Gilles Lerussi, Bruno Delelis
{"title":"动静脉瘘血液透析患者上腔静脉和臂-脑静脉闭塞支架植入术的长期疗效。","authors":"Florent Porez, Reuben Veerapen, Stéphanie Delelis, Sarah Kirat, Eric Braunberger, Gilles Lerussi, Bruno Delelis","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central vein occlusion (CVO) is a significant complication in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, often leading to dialysis inefficacy, disabling symptoms, and, most critically, major risk of access failure. While stenting has been proposed as a technique to maintain vascular access patency following the recanalization of occluded central veins, the data supporting its long-term efficacy remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of stenting occluded superior vena cava (SVC) and/or brachiocephalic veins (BCV) to preserve vascular access patency, ensure continued dialysis efficacy and relieve SVC syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed all hemodialysis patients who underwent stent placement for central venous occlusion between January 2017 and August 2024 at two vascular centers in Reunion Island. The primary endpoints of the study were the primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of the vascular circuit during follow-up. Additionally, patient demographics, medical comorbidities, post-operative complications, definitive access abandonment and re-interventions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 21 patients with a mean age of 67 years. CVO stenting initially provided symptomatic relief for all patients, resolving symptoms such as superior vena cava or arm swelling in symptomatic patients. Over a median follow-up period of 41 months (range: 3-80 months), the primary patency rates were 67% at 12 months, 42% at 24 months and 38% at 36 months, while the secondary patency rates were 90%, 79%, and 60% at these same intervals. Twelve patients (62%) experienced clinically significant stent restenosis, necessitating one or several additional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) during follow-up, while five patients (24%) developed acute access thrombosis requiring thrombectomy and PTA, with central stent involved for 3 patients. Three patients (14%) required extra-anatomic bypasses due to definitive stent occlusion, five patients (14%) had definitive access failure and five patients (24%) died from unrelated causes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review suggests that hemodialysis patients with symptomatic central vein occlusion can often be successfully recanalized and treated with stenting, leading to symptom resolution and, importantly, achieving promising secondary patency rates. Our long-term results highlight the necessity for regular reintervention and close follow-up, as a significant number of patients will experience restenosis, and ultimately definitive access failure. Therefore, CVO stenting should be considered a temporary solution, although for some patients, this strategy may prove highly effective, maintaining long-term patency without any restenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","volume":" ","pages":"102007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Outcomes of Stenting Superior Cava and Brachio-cephalic Vein Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients with Arteriovenous Fistulas.\",\"authors\":\"Florent Porez, Reuben Veerapen, Stéphanie Delelis, Sarah Kirat, Eric Braunberger, Gilles Lerussi, Bruno Delelis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central vein occlusion (CVO) is a significant complication in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, often leading to dialysis inefficacy, disabling symptoms, and, most critically, major risk of access failure. While stenting has been proposed as a technique to maintain vascular access patency following the recanalization of occluded central veins, the data supporting its long-term efficacy remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of stenting occluded superior vena cava (SVC) and/or brachiocephalic veins (BCV) to preserve vascular access patency, ensure continued dialysis efficacy and relieve SVC syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed all hemodialysis patients who underwent stent placement for central venous occlusion between January 2017 and August 2024 at two vascular centers in Reunion Island. The primary endpoints of the study were the primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of the vascular circuit during follow-up. Additionally, patient demographics, medical comorbidities, post-operative complications, definitive access abandonment and re-interventions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 21 patients with a mean age of 67 years. CVO stenting initially provided symptomatic relief for all patients, resolving symptoms such as superior vena cava or arm swelling in symptomatic patients. Over a median follow-up period of 41 months (range: 3-80 months), the primary patency rates were 67% at 12 months, 42% at 24 months and 38% at 36 months, while the secondary patency rates were 90%, 79%, and 60% at these same intervals. Twelve patients (62%) experienced clinically significant stent restenosis, necessitating one or several additional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) during follow-up, while five patients (24%) developed acute access thrombosis requiring thrombectomy and PTA, with central stent involved for 3 patients. Three patients (14%) required extra-anatomic bypasses due to definitive stent occlusion, five patients (14%) had definitive access failure and five patients (24%) died from unrelated causes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review suggests that hemodialysis patients with symptomatic central vein occlusion can often be successfully recanalized and treated with stenting, leading to symptom resolution and, importantly, achieving promising secondary patency rates. Our long-term results highlight the necessity for regular reintervention and close follow-up, as a significant number of patients will experience restenosis, and ultimately definitive access failure. Therefore, CVO stenting should be considered a temporary solution, although for some patients, this strategy may prove highly effective, maintaining long-term patency without any restenosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中心静脉闭塞(CVO)是慢性血液透析患者的一个重要并发症,通常会导致透析效果不佳、致残症状,最关键的是,还存在通路失败的重大风险。虽然支架植入术被认为是在闭塞的中心静脉再通之后保持血管通路通畅的一种技术,但支持其长期疗效的数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估对闭塞的上腔静脉(SVC)和/或肱静脉(BCV)进行支架植入以保持血管通路通畅、确保持续透析疗效并缓解 SVC 综合征的长期有效性:本研究回顾性分析了2017年1月至2024年8月期间在留尼汪岛两家血管中心因中心静脉闭塞而接受支架置入术的所有血液透析患者。研究的主要终点是随访期间血管回路的主要、辅助主要和次要通畅率。此外,还分析了患者的人口统计学、医学合并症、术后并发症、最终通路放弃和再次干预:本研究共纳入 21 名患者,平均年龄为 67 岁。CVO支架植入术最初缓解了所有患者的症状,解决了无症状患者的上腔静脉或手臂肿胀等症状。中位随访时间为 41 个月(范围:3-80 个月),12 个月时的一次通畅率为 67%,24 个月时为 42%,36 个月时为 38%,而相同时间间隔内的二次通畅率分别为 90%、79% 和 60%。有 12 名患者(62%)出现了临床意义上的支架再狭窄,需要在随访期间进行一次或多次经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA),有 5 名患者(24%)出现了急性入路血栓,需要进行血栓切除术和 PTA,其中 3 名患者的中心支架受到了牵连。3名患者(14%)因确定性支架闭塞而需要解剖外搭桥,5名患者(14%)确定性通路失败,5名患者(24%)死于无关原因:本综述表明,有症状的中心静脉闭塞血液透析患者通常可以通过支架治疗成功实现再通畅,从而缓解症状,更重要的是,二次通畅率也很可观。我们的长期研究结果强调了定期再介入和密切随访的必要性,因为相当多的患者会出现再狭窄,最终导致通路失败。因此,CVO 支架植入术应被视为一种临时解决方案,尽管对某些患者来说,这种策略可能被证明非常有效,能保持长期通畅,且不会出现任何再狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term Outcomes of Stenting Superior Cava and Brachio-cephalic Vein Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients with Arteriovenous Fistulas.

Background: Central vein occlusion (CVO) is a significant complication in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, often leading to dialysis inefficacy, disabling symptoms, and, most critically, major risk of access failure. While stenting has been proposed as a technique to maintain vascular access patency following the recanalization of occluded central veins, the data supporting its long-term efficacy remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of stenting occluded superior vena cava (SVC) and/or brachiocephalic veins (BCV) to preserve vascular access patency, ensure continued dialysis efficacy and relieve SVC syndrome.

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed all hemodialysis patients who underwent stent placement for central venous occlusion between January 2017 and August 2024 at two vascular centers in Reunion Island. The primary endpoints of the study were the primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of the vascular circuit during follow-up. Additionally, patient demographics, medical comorbidities, post-operative complications, definitive access abandonment and re-interventions were analyzed.

Results: This study included 21 patients with a mean age of 67 years. CVO stenting initially provided symptomatic relief for all patients, resolving symptoms such as superior vena cava or arm swelling in symptomatic patients. Over a median follow-up period of 41 months (range: 3-80 months), the primary patency rates were 67% at 12 months, 42% at 24 months and 38% at 36 months, while the secondary patency rates were 90%, 79%, and 60% at these same intervals. Twelve patients (62%) experienced clinically significant stent restenosis, necessitating one or several additional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) during follow-up, while five patients (24%) developed acute access thrombosis requiring thrombectomy and PTA, with central stent involved for 3 patients. Three patients (14%) required extra-anatomic bypasses due to definitive stent occlusion, five patients (14%) had definitive access failure and five patients (24%) died from unrelated causes.

Conclusions: This review suggests that hemodialysis patients with symptomatic central vein occlusion can often be successfully recanalized and treated with stenting, leading to symptom resolution and, importantly, achieving promising secondary patency rates. Our long-term results highlight the necessity for regular reintervention and close follow-up, as a significant number of patients will experience restenosis, and ultimately definitive access failure. Therefore, CVO stenting should be considered a temporary solution, although for some patients, this strategy may prove highly effective, maintaining long-term patency without any restenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders SURGERYPERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE&n-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
328
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders is one of a series of specialist journals launched by the Journal of Vascular Surgery. It aims to be the premier international Journal of medical, endovascular and surgical management of venous and lymphatic disorders. It publishes high quality clinical, research, case reports, techniques, and practice manuscripts related to all aspects of venous and lymphatic disorders, including malformations and wound care, with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals who treat patients presenting with vascular and lymphatic disorders. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of these organizations and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
Long-term Outcomes of Stenting Superior Cava and Brachio-cephalic Vein Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients with Arteriovenous Fistulas. EFFICACY OF COMPLEX DECONGESTIVE THERAPY ON VENOUS FLOW, INTERNAL SAPHENOUS DIAMETER, EDEMA, FAT MASS OF THE LIMBS AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Residual popliteal vein thrombosis after endovascular treatment of mixed-type lower extremity deep vein thrombosis is relevant to post-thrombotic syndrome. Comparative Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Saphenous Vein Radiofrequency Ablation. In-human clinical experience with direct stick embolization of low-flow vascular malformations using a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1