前循环和后循环卒中的机械取栓失败:一个大容量综合中心的当前结果。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07881-2
Alexander Neumann, P Schildhauer, S M Weiler, P Schramm, H Schacht, G Royl, U Jensen-Kondering
{"title":"前循环和后循环卒中的机械取栓失败:一个大容量综合中心的当前结果。","authors":"Alexander Neumann, P Schildhauer, S M Weiler, P Schramm, H Schacht, G Royl, U Jensen-Kondering","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07881-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an established therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but recanalization is not always achieved. Common reasons are inadequate removal at the thrombus site and difficulties with the access route. In order to identify risk factors for MT failure we conducted a retrospective study on a high-volume comprehensive stroke center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evaluation of 552 thrombectomies (2019-23; anterior and posterior circulation, direct aspiration +/- stent retriever [SR]). MT failures (= modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 0 or 1) were analyzed for age, sex, pre- and post-MT modified Rankin Scale, bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), occlusion site (anterior / posterior circulation, proximal / distal), the Kaesmacher classification and time trend results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MT failure occurred in 56 patients (10.1%; median age 76; 53.6% female). Nineteen (33.9%) patients received IVT (p = 0.326). Logistic regression analysis did not show a significant association of age, sex or occlusion site with MT failure (p = 0.165, p = 0.738, p = 0.838). Distal MT generally demonstrated lower success rates (p < 0.01). According to the Kaesmacher classification SR failure was the most frequent cause of MT failure (category 2B: 48%, p < 0.001). Time trend analysis suggests improving recanalization rates in the further course (4 times in year-on-year comparison; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MT failure occurs in AIS treatment, even in high-volume centers and occurs more frequently in distal occlusions. Improvements in device technology, particularly SR, and ongoing refinements in access route selection offer the prospect of better outcomes in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical thrombectomy failure in anterior and posterior circulation stroke: current results from a high-volume comprehensive center.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Neumann, P Schildhauer, S M Weiler, P Schramm, H Schacht, G Royl, U Jensen-Kondering\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-024-07881-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an established therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but recanalization is not always achieved. Common reasons are inadequate removal at the thrombus site and difficulties with the access route. In order to identify risk factors for MT failure we conducted a retrospective study on a high-volume comprehensive stroke center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evaluation of 552 thrombectomies (2019-23; anterior and posterior circulation, direct aspiration +/- stent retriever [SR]). MT failures (= modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 0 or 1) were analyzed for age, sex, pre- and post-MT modified Rankin Scale, bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), occlusion site (anterior / posterior circulation, proximal / distal), the Kaesmacher classification and time trend results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MT failure occurred in 56 patients (10.1%; median age 76; 53.6% female). Nineteen (33.9%) patients received IVT (p = 0.326). Logistic regression analysis did not show a significant association of age, sex or occlusion site with MT failure (p = 0.165, p = 0.738, p = 0.838). Distal MT generally demonstrated lower success rates (p < 0.01). According to the Kaesmacher classification SR failure was the most frequent cause of MT failure (category 2B: 48%, p < 0.001). Time trend analysis suggests improving recanalization rates in the further course (4 times in year-on-year comparison; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MT failure occurs in AIS treatment, even in high-volume centers and occurs more frequently in distal occlusions. Improvements in device technology, particularly SR, and ongoing refinements in access route selection offer the prospect of better outcomes in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07881-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07881-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机械血栓切除术(MT)是治疗急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)的一种成熟疗法,但并非总能实现再通畅。常见的原因是血栓部位清除不彻底和通路困难。为了确定MT失败的风险因素,我们在一个大容量综合卒中中心进行了一项回顾性研究:评估了 552 例血栓切除术(2019-23;前后循环,直接抽吸 +/- 支架回取器 [SR])。对MT失败(=改良脑梗死溶栓评分0或1分)的年龄、性别、MT前后改良Rankin量表、桥接静脉溶栓(IVT)、闭塞部位(前/后循环、近端/远端)、Kaesmacher分级和时间趋势结果进行了分析:56名患者(10.1%;中位年龄76岁;53.6%为女性)出现MT失败。19名患者(33.9%)接受了 IVT(P = 0.326)。逻辑回归分析表明,年龄、性别或闭塞部位与 MT 失败无明显关联(p = 0.165、p = 0.738、p = 0.838)。远端 MT 的成功率普遍较低(P即使在高流量中心,AIS 治疗中也会出现 MT 失败,而且远端闭塞发生率更高。设备技术(尤其是 SR)的改进和入路选择的不断完善有望在未来取得更好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mechanical thrombectomy failure in anterior and posterior circulation stroke: current results from a high-volume comprehensive center.

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an established therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but recanalization is not always achieved. Common reasons are inadequate removal at the thrombus site and difficulties with the access route. In order to identify risk factors for MT failure we conducted a retrospective study on a high-volume comprehensive stroke center.

Methods: Evaluation of 552 thrombectomies (2019-23; anterior and posterior circulation, direct aspiration +/- stent retriever [SR]). MT failures (= modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 0 or 1) were analyzed for age, sex, pre- and post-MT modified Rankin Scale, bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), occlusion site (anterior / posterior circulation, proximal / distal), the Kaesmacher classification and time trend results.

Results: MT failure occurred in 56 patients (10.1%; median age 76; 53.6% female). Nineteen (33.9%) patients received IVT (p = 0.326). Logistic regression analysis did not show a significant association of age, sex or occlusion site with MT failure (p = 0.165, p = 0.738, p = 0.838). Distal MT generally demonstrated lower success rates (p < 0.01). According to the Kaesmacher classification SR failure was the most frequent cause of MT failure (category 2B: 48%, p < 0.001). Time trend analysis suggests improving recanalization rates in the further course (4 times in year-on-year comparison; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: MT failure occurs in AIS treatment, even in high-volume centers and occurs more frequently in distal occlusions. Improvements in device technology, particularly SR, and ongoing refinements in access route selection offer the prospect of better outcomes in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short‑ and long‑term outcomes: a meta‑analysis of 6 randomised control trials. Correction to: Clinical, electrophysiological, and genetic analysis of a family with two rare neuromuscular disorders: congenital myasthenic syndrome and hereditary polyneuropathy. Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short- and long-term outcomes: a meta-analysis of 6 randomised control trials. Effect of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with large core: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Efficacy of pain management strategies in adults with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1