以行为改变为导向的痴呆症预防所面临的社会生态障碍:对医护人员观点的定性研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging & Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1080/13607863.2024.2430525
Ryan A Mace, Joshua E Cohen, Christopher Lyons, Christine Ritchie, Stephen Bartels, Olivia I Okereke, Bettina B Hoeppner, Judson Brewer, Jin Hui Joo, Ana-Maria Vranceanu
{"title":"以行为改变为导向的痴呆症预防所面临的社会生态障碍:对医护人员观点的定性研究。","authors":"Ryan A Mace, Joshua E Cohen, Christopher Lyons, Christine Ritchie, Stephen Bartels, Olivia I Okereke, Bettina B Hoeppner, Judson Brewer, Jin Hui Joo, Ana-Maria Vranceanu","doi":"10.1080/13607863.2024.2430525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This qualitative study aimed to: (1) identify socio-ecological barriers to behavior change-oriented dementia (AD/ADRD) prevention from the perspectives of healthcare professionals, and (2) propose strategies to address these barriers during a clinical trial for an AD/ADRD prevention program (<i>My Healthy Brain</i>).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Multidisciplinary healthcare professionals involved in geriatric care (<i>N</i> = 26, <i>M</i> experience > 17 years) from diverse clinics within a medical center participated in focus groups. Using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), 5 focus groups were conducted to identify individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and societal barriers. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework informed evidence-based strategies to overcome these barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare professionals identified barriers, including limited resources, language and technological barriers, provider dismissiveness, competing institutional priorities, underrepresentation of minority groups, and biases towards biomedical treatments. Strategies to address these barriers involved enhancing accessibility, increasing provider training and support, integrating interventions within clinic operations, fostering community partnerships, and addressing societal misconceptions and biases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating SEM and ERIC frameworks yielded strategies that will be used in <i>My Healthy Brain</i> trial to enhance equity and responsiveness to diverse older adults. Our results can inform efforts to address multi-level barriers to AD/ADRD prevention and the larger contexts influencing risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":55546,"journal":{"name":"Aging & Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-ecological barriers to behavior change-oriented dementia prevention: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan A Mace, Joshua E Cohen, Christopher Lyons, Christine Ritchie, Stephen Bartels, Olivia I Okereke, Bettina B Hoeppner, Judson Brewer, Jin Hui Joo, Ana-Maria Vranceanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13607863.2024.2430525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This qualitative study aimed to: (1) identify socio-ecological barriers to behavior change-oriented dementia (AD/ADRD) prevention from the perspectives of healthcare professionals, and (2) propose strategies to address these barriers during a clinical trial for an AD/ADRD prevention program (<i>My Healthy Brain</i>).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Multidisciplinary healthcare professionals involved in geriatric care (<i>N</i> = 26, <i>M</i> experience > 17 years) from diverse clinics within a medical center participated in focus groups. Using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), 5 focus groups were conducted to identify individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and societal barriers. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework informed evidence-based strategies to overcome these barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare professionals identified barriers, including limited resources, language and technological barriers, provider dismissiveness, competing institutional priorities, underrepresentation of minority groups, and biases towards biomedical treatments. Strategies to address these barriers involved enhancing accessibility, increasing provider training and support, integrating interventions within clinic operations, fostering community partnerships, and addressing societal misconceptions and biases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating SEM and ERIC frameworks yielded strategies that will be used in <i>My Healthy Brain</i> trial to enhance equity and responsiveness to diverse older adults. Our results can inform efforts to address multi-level barriers to AD/ADRD prevention and the larger contexts influencing risk factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging & Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging & Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2430525\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging & Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2430525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目标本定性研究旨在(1)从医疗保健专业人员的角度出发,确定以行为改变为导向的痴呆症(AD/ADRD)预防所面临的社会生态障碍,以及(2)在AD/ADRD预防计划(我的健康大脑)的临床试验期间,提出解决这些障碍的策略:方法:来自一家医疗中心不同诊所的从事老年病护理的多学科医护专业人员(人数=26,男性经验>17年)参加了焦点小组。利用社会生态模型(SEM),共进行了 5 次焦点小组讨论,以确定个人、人际、机构、社区和社会方面的障碍。专家建议实施变革(ERIC)框架为克服这些障碍提供了循证策略:结果:医疗保健专业人员发现了各种障碍,包括资源有限、语言和技术障碍、提供者的轻视、机构优先事项的竞争、少数群体代表性不足以及对生物医学治疗的偏见。解决这些障碍的策略包括提高可及性、增加提供者的培训和支持、在诊所运营中整合干预措施、促进社区合作以及消除社会误解和偏见:综合 SEM 和 ERIC 框架得出的策略将用于 "我的健康大脑 "试验,以提高公平性和对不同老年人的响应能力。我们的研究结果可为解决预防注意力缺失症/注意力缺失性痴呆症的多层次障碍以及影响风险因素的更大背景提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socio-ecological barriers to behavior change-oriented dementia prevention: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.

Objectives: This qualitative study aimed to: (1) identify socio-ecological barriers to behavior change-oriented dementia (AD/ADRD) prevention from the perspectives of healthcare professionals, and (2) propose strategies to address these barriers during a clinical trial for an AD/ADRD prevention program (My Healthy Brain).

Method: Multidisciplinary healthcare professionals involved in geriatric care (N = 26, M experience > 17 years) from diverse clinics within a medical center participated in focus groups. Using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), 5 focus groups were conducted to identify individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and societal barriers. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework informed evidence-based strategies to overcome these barriers.

Results: Healthcare professionals identified barriers, including limited resources, language and technological barriers, provider dismissiveness, competing institutional priorities, underrepresentation of minority groups, and biases towards biomedical treatments. Strategies to address these barriers involved enhancing accessibility, increasing provider training and support, integrating interventions within clinic operations, fostering community partnerships, and addressing societal misconceptions and biases.

Conclusion: Integrating SEM and ERIC frameworks yielded strategies that will be used in My Healthy Brain trial to enhance equity and responsiveness to diverse older adults. Our results can inform efforts to address multi-level barriers to AD/ADRD prevention and the larger contexts influencing risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging & Mental Health
Aging & Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Mental Health provides a leading international forum for the rapidly expanding field which investigates the relationship between the aging process and mental health. The journal addresses the mental changes associated with normal and abnormal or pathological aging, as well as the psychological and psychiatric problems of the aging population. The journal also has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that explore new topics and methods. Aging & Mental Health covers the biological, psychological and social aspects of aging as they relate to mental health. In particular it encourages an integrated approach for examining various biopsychosocial processes and etiological factors associated with psychological changes in the elderly. It also emphasizes the various strategies, therapies and services which may be directed at improving the mental health of the elderly and their families. In this way the journal promotes a strong alliance among the theoretical, experimental and applied sciences across a range of issues affecting mental health and aging. The emphasis of the journal is on rigorous quantitative, and qualitative, research and, high quality innovative studies on emerging topics.
期刊最新文献
Examining mental health and autonomic function as putative mediators of the relationship between sleep and trajectories of cognitive function: findings from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA). Exploring the associations between structural and functional aspects of social relationships and cognition in very old age. Sensory impairments and depressive symptoms in Europe: a cross-national cohort study. Co-occurrence of depressive and anxious symptoms and their influence on self-rated health: a national representative survey among Chinese older adults. Reaching people and managing membership in community-based dementia support groups: the Get Real with Meeting Centres realist evaluation part 1.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1