金黄色葡萄球菌泪道系统感染的微生物学和处理:一项为期 10 年的回顾性研究。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314366
Niloufar Bineshfar, Kevin D Clauss, Wendy W Lee, Darlene Miller
{"title":"金黄色葡萄球菌泪道系统感染的微生物学和处理:一项为期 10 年的回顾性研究。","authors":"Niloufar Bineshfar, Kevin D Clauss, Wendy W Lee, Darlene Miller","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0314366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the in vitro efficacy of common antimicrobial agents used empirically for methicillin- resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA) infections of the lacrimal system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of culture-proven S. aureus isolates retrieved from lacrimal system samples collected between January 2013-December 2022 was performed. Microbiologic characteristics such as in vitro susceptibility as well as clinical characteristics including history of recent ocular surgery, presence of lacrimal biomaterial implant, anti-microbial regimen, and treatments outcome were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixteen S. aureus isolates (patients = 116) were identified. Thirty-one (27.4%) and 22 (19.5%) patients had recent ocular procedure and lacrimal intubation, respectively. Fifty (44.2%) patients received a combination of oral and topical antibiotics as first line of treatment. The most common empirically utilized antibiotics were β-lactams (38.9%) and polymyxin B/ trimethoprim (31.0%). The antibiotic regimen was changed at least once in 20.5% of patients due to ineffectiveness. Of the patients with positive cultures from the lacrimal excretory apparatus, 37.3% underwent surgery as part of the treatment approach. Of all isolates identified 44.8% were MRSA. Among the fluoroquinolones, the resistance rate was 38.8% for ciprofloxacin and 30.4% for moxifloxacin, with significantly higher resistance rates in MRSA (P-value <0.0001). The resistance rates for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SXT) and gentamicin were 8.6% and 3.4%, retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is low in vitro efficacy of commonly used antimicrobials such as β-lactams and fluoroquinolones in our study population; thus, we recommend opting for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and gentamicin for systemic and topical single-agent treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0314366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiology and management of Staphylococcus aureus lacrimal system infections: A 10-year retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Niloufar Bineshfar, Kevin D Clauss, Wendy W Lee, Darlene Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0314366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the in vitro efficacy of common antimicrobial agents used empirically for methicillin- resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA) infections of the lacrimal system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of culture-proven S. aureus isolates retrieved from lacrimal system samples collected between January 2013-December 2022 was performed. Microbiologic characteristics such as in vitro susceptibility as well as clinical characteristics including history of recent ocular surgery, presence of lacrimal biomaterial implant, anti-microbial regimen, and treatments outcome were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixteen S. aureus isolates (patients = 116) were identified. Thirty-one (27.4%) and 22 (19.5%) patients had recent ocular procedure and lacrimal intubation, respectively. Fifty (44.2%) patients received a combination of oral and topical antibiotics as first line of treatment. The most common empirically utilized antibiotics were β-lactams (38.9%) and polymyxin B/ trimethoprim (31.0%). The antibiotic regimen was changed at least once in 20.5% of patients due to ineffectiveness. Of the patients with positive cultures from the lacrimal excretory apparatus, 37.3% underwent surgery as part of the treatment approach. Of all isolates identified 44.8% were MRSA. Among the fluoroquinolones, the resistance rate was 38.8% for ciprofloxacin and 30.4% for moxifloxacin, with significantly higher resistance rates in MRSA (P-value <0.0001). The resistance rates for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SXT) and gentamicin were 8.6% and 3.4%, retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is low in vitro efficacy of commonly used antimicrobials such as β-lactams and fluoroquinolones in our study population; thus, we recommend opting for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and gentamicin for systemic and topical single-agent treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 11\",\"pages\":\"e0314366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314366\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估经验性用于治疗泪道系统耐甲氧西林和敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA 和 MSSA)感染的常用抗菌药物的体外疗效:对 2013 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间从泪道系统样本中提取的经培养证实的金黄色葡萄球菌分离物进行了回顾性研究。收集了微生物学特征(如体外药敏性)和临床特征(包括近期眼科手术史、是否植入泪道生物材料、抗微生物疗法和治疗结果):结果:共鉴定出 116 例金葡菌分离株(患者=116 例)。分别有 31 名(27.4%)和 22 名(19.5%)患者近期进行过眼部手术和泪道插管。50名(44.2%)患者接受了口服和局部抗生素联合治疗作为一线治疗方案。最常用的经验性抗生素是β-内酰胺类(38.9%)和多粘菌素B/三甲氧苄啶(31.0%)。20.5%的患者因疗效不佳至少更换过一次抗生素方案。在泪腺排泄器培养阳性的患者中,37.3%的患者在治疗过程中接受了手术。在所有鉴定出的分离物中,44.8%为 MRSA。在氟喹诺酮类药物中,环丙沙星的耐药率为 38.8%,莫西沙星的耐药率为 30.4%,MRSA 的耐药率明显更高(P 值 结论):在我们的研究人群中,β-内酰胺类和氟喹诺酮类等常用抗菌药的体外疗效较低;因此,我们建议选择三甲双胍/磺胺甲噁唑和庆大霉素进行全身和局部单药治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microbiology and management of Staphylococcus aureus lacrimal system infections: A 10-year retrospective study.

Purpose: To assess the in vitro efficacy of common antimicrobial agents used empirically for methicillin- resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA) infections of the lacrimal system.

Methods: A retrospective review of culture-proven S. aureus isolates retrieved from lacrimal system samples collected between January 2013-December 2022 was performed. Microbiologic characteristics such as in vitro susceptibility as well as clinical characteristics including history of recent ocular surgery, presence of lacrimal biomaterial implant, anti-microbial regimen, and treatments outcome were collected.

Results: One hundred and sixteen S. aureus isolates (patients = 116) were identified. Thirty-one (27.4%) and 22 (19.5%) patients had recent ocular procedure and lacrimal intubation, respectively. Fifty (44.2%) patients received a combination of oral and topical antibiotics as first line of treatment. The most common empirically utilized antibiotics were β-lactams (38.9%) and polymyxin B/ trimethoprim (31.0%). The antibiotic regimen was changed at least once in 20.5% of patients due to ineffectiveness. Of the patients with positive cultures from the lacrimal excretory apparatus, 37.3% underwent surgery as part of the treatment approach. Of all isolates identified 44.8% were MRSA. Among the fluoroquinolones, the resistance rate was 38.8% for ciprofloxacin and 30.4% for moxifloxacin, with significantly higher resistance rates in MRSA (P-value <0.0001). The resistance rates for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SXT) and gentamicin were 8.6% and 3.4%, retrospectively.

Conclusions: There is low in vitro efficacy of commonly used antimicrobials such as β-lactams and fluoroquinolones in our study population; thus, we recommend opting for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and gentamicin for systemic and topical single-agent treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Dielectric and physicochemical characterization of Creole chicken breast meat for quality classification in the radiofrequency range. Distinct endometrial protein profiles in spontaneous and stimulated cycles in women with poor ovarian response: A prospective case-crossover clinical trial. Distributions of Xenopus species and their helminth parasites in ecological zones of Nigeria. Introduction of artificial plants has no detrimental or beneficial effects on laboratory zebrafish husbandry but limits available swimming space. Genomic diversity of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates in Kenya revealed by MLST, NG-MAST, and NG-STAR typing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1