非正规护理人员在重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者共同决策方面的角色和需求。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108554
Judith J.A.M. van Beek-Peeters , Miriam C. Faes , Mirela Habibovic , Jop B.L. van der Meer , Ruth E. Pel-Littel , Martijn W.A. van Geldorp , Ben J.L. Van den Branden , Nardo J.M. van der Meer , Mirella M.N. Minkman
{"title":"非正规护理人员在重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者共同决策方面的角色和需求。","authors":"Judith J.A.M. van Beek-Peeters ,&nbsp;Miriam C. Faes ,&nbsp;Mirela Habibovic ,&nbsp;Jop B.L. van der Meer ,&nbsp;Ruth E. Pel-Littel ,&nbsp;Martijn W.A. van Geldorp ,&nbsp;Ben J.L. Van den Branden ,&nbsp;Nardo J.M. van der Meer ,&nbsp;Mirella M.N. Minkman","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide insight into experiences, preferences and needs of informal caregivers (ICs) regarding shared decision-making (SDM) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) of patients ≥ 70 years, and the effect of the level of perceived SDM on ICs’ quality of life (QOL) and distress.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multiple methods study consisting of a questionnaire at baseline and 3-month follow-up and focus groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-nine ICs (67.6 ± 11.7 years) completed the baseline questionnaire, eighty-two ICs the follow-up questionnaire<strong>,</strong> ten ICs (70.6 ± 12.6 years) participated in two focus groups. ICs perceived that identifying them as discussion partners and addressing patients’ daily lives were least discussed with professionals (26.3 %; 59.6 %). Most ICs (63.9 %) preferred a collaborative decision-making (DM) role. The level of perceived SDM was positively associated with baseline QOL social relations (p = .038), and follow-up QOL psychological health (p = .048) and environment (p = .024). ICs experienced three roles in SDM: supporters in DM, stimulators in clarifying patient’s personal context, and DM partners.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ICs play valuable roles in SDM for severe AS, but feel professionals do not consistently identify them as discussion partners.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>Professionals should involve ICs in SDM for discussing older patient’s QOL and personal context, which can inform personalized decisions regarding severe AS treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 108554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informal caregivers’ roles and needs regarding shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis\",\"authors\":\"Judith J.A.M. van Beek-Peeters ,&nbsp;Miriam C. Faes ,&nbsp;Mirela Habibovic ,&nbsp;Jop B.L. van der Meer ,&nbsp;Ruth E. Pel-Littel ,&nbsp;Martijn W.A. van Geldorp ,&nbsp;Ben J.L. Van den Branden ,&nbsp;Nardo J.M. van der Meer ,&nbsp;Mirella M.N. Minkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide insight into experiences, preferences and needs of informal caregivers (ICs) regarding shared decision-making (SDM) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) of patients ≥ 70 years, and the effect of the level of perceived SDM on ICs’ quality of life (QOL) and distress.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multiple methods study consisting of a questionnaire at baseline and 3-month follow-up and focus groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-nine ICs (67.6 ± 11.7 years) completed the baseline questionnaire, eighty-two ICs the follow-up questionnaire<strong>,</strong> ten ICs (70.6 ± 12.6 years) participated in two focus groups. ICs perceived that identifying them as discussion partners and addressing patients’ daily lives were least discussed with professionals (26.3 %; 59.6 %). Most ICs (63.9 %) preferred a collaborative decision-making (DM) role. The level of perceived SDM was positively associated with baseline QOL social relations (p = .038), and follow-up QOL psychological health (p = .048) and environment (p = .024). ICs experienced three roles in SDM: supporters in DM, stimulators in clarifying patient’s personal context, and DM partners.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ICs play valuable roles in SDM for severe AS, but feel professionals do not consistently identify them as discussion partners.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>Professionals should involve ICs in SDM for discussing older patient’s QOL and personal context, which can inform personalized decisions regarding severe AS treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073839912400421X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073839912400421X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的深入了解非正规照顾者(ICs)对 70 岁以上重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者共同决策(SDM)的经验、偏好和需求,以及感知到的 SDM 水平对 ICs 生活质量(QOL)和痛苦的影响:方法:多方法研究,包括基线问卷调查、3 个月随访和焦点小组:99 名集成电路设计师(67.6 ± 11.7 岁)完成了基线问卷,82 名集成电路设计师完成了后续问卷,10 名集成电路设计师(70.6 ± 12.6 岁)参加了两个焦点小组。综合症患者认为,与专业人员讨论最少的是确定他们为讨论伙伴和解决患者的日常生活问题(26.3%;59.6%)。大多数集成电路(63.9%)倾向于合作决策(DM)角色。感知到的 SDM 水平与基线 QOL 社会关系(p = .038)、后续 QOL 心理健康(p = .048)和环境(p = .024)呈正相关。综合治疗师在 SDM 中扮演了三种角色:DM 的支持者、澄清患者个人背景的激励者和 DM 的合作伙伴:集成治疗师在重度 AS 的 SDM 中发挥着重要作用,但专业人员并未始终将他们视为讨论伙伴:专业人员应让 IC 参与 SDM,讨论老年患者的 QOL 和个人背景,这可以为有关严重 AS 治疗的个性化决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Informal caregivers’ roles and needs regarding shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis

Objective

To provide insight into experiences, preferences and needs of informal caregivers (ICs) regarding shared decision-making (SDM) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) of patients ≥ 70 years, and the effect of the level of perceived SDM on ICs’ quality of life (QOL) and distress.

Methods

Multiple methods study consisting of a questionnaire at baseline and 3-month follow-up and focus groups.

Results

Ninety-nine ICs (67.6 ± 11.7 years) completed the baseline questionnaire, eighty-two ICs the follow-up questionnaire, ten ICs (70.6 ± 12.6 years) participated in two focus groups. ICs perceived that identifying them as discussion partners and addressing patients’ daily lives were least discussed with professionals (26.3 %; 59.6 %). Most ICs (63.9 %) preferred a collaborative decision-making (DM) role. The level of perceived SDM was positively associated with baseline QOL social relations (p = .038), and follow-up QOL psychological health (p = .048) and environment (p = .024). ICs experienced three roles in SDM: supporters in DM, stimulators in clarifying patient’s personal context, and DM partners.

Conclusion

ICs play valuable roles in SDM for severe AS, but feel professionals do not consistently identify them as discussion partners.

Practice implications

Professionals should involve ICs in SDM for discussing older patient’s QOL and personal context, which can inform personalized decisions regarding severe AS treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
Embedding an illustrator in the process of co-producing resources to enhance communication and shared decision-making for patients prescribed high-risk medication. Effect of fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on couple's preterm birth preparedness. Nonverbal behavior in telehealth visits: A narrative review. Effective remediation for advanced practice providers with lowest patient experience: The power of relational resources. Relative importance of "why" and "how" messages on medication behavior: Insights from construal level theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1