Yeray Sañudo , Canan Akoglu , Judith A.C. Rietjens , Dirk Snelders , Anne M. Stiggelbout , Jorge Sierra-Pérez
{"title":"在医疗服务中实施支持共同决策的设计方法：系统综述。","authors":"Yeray Sañudo , Canan Akoglu , Judith A.C. Rietjens , Dirk Snelders , Anne M. Stiggelbout , Jorge Sierra-Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review examines how design methodologies support Shared Decision Making (SDM), identifies the most suitable for future use, explores types of methodologies used, challenges faced, and the impact on patients, clinicians, and care pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies were searched on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature (Google Scholar, CORDIS) up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>were analysed to identify patient involvement, design strategies, SDM solutions, and their impact on care paths, professionals, and patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 2499 studies and 39 grey literature projects identified, 22 studies (reported in 35 publications) were selected, primarily from the USA and Europe (2015 onward). User-Centered Design predominated, involving health professionals more than patients. IPDAS standards were common. Evaluations showed improved patient experience and SDM role, with a potential increase in healthcare professionals' workload.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although design methodologies are used in SDM implementation, improvement is needed. Service Design can enhance implementation by analysing the entire SDM process, while co-creative approaches develop patient-focused solutions that integrate smoothly into health professionals' workflows.</div></div><div><h3>Practical implications</h3><div>Introducing SDM in healthcare is complex, but design methodologies can help by analysing stakeholder needs, providing a broader care path view, and facilitating SDM implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 108551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The implementation of design methodologies for supporting shared decision making in healthcare services: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Yeray Sañudo , Canan Akoglu , Judith A.C. Rietjens , Dirk Snelders , Anne M. Stiggelbout , Jorge Sierra-Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review examines how design methodologies support Shared Decision Making (SDM), identifies the most suitable for future use, explores types of methodologies used, challenges faced, and the impact on patients, clinicians, and care pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies were searched on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature (Google Scholar, CORDIS) up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>were analysed to identify patient involvement, design strategies, SDM solutions, and their impact on care paths, professionals, and patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 2499 studies and 39 grey literature projects identified, 22 studies (reported in 35 publications) were selected, primarily from the USA and Europe (2015 onward). User-Centered Design predominated, involving health professionals more than patients. IPDAS standards were common. Evaluations showed improved patient experience and SDM role, with a potential increase in healthcare professionals' workload.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although design methodologies are used in SDM implementation, improvement is needed. Service Design can enhance implementation by analysing the entire SDM process, while co-creative approaches develop patient-focused solutions that integrate smoothly into health professionals' workflows.</div></div><div><h3>Practical implications</h3><div>Introducing SDM in healthcare is complex, but design methodologies can help by analysing stakeholder needs, providing a broader care path view, and facilitating SDM implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073839912400418X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073839912400418X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The implementation of design methodologies for supporting shared decision making in healthcare services: A systematic review.
Objectives
This systematic review examines how design methodologies support Shared Decision Making (SDM), identifies the most suitable for future use, explores types of methodologies used, challenges faced, and the impact on patients, clinicians, and care pathways.
Methods
Studies were searched on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature (Google Scholar, CORDIS) up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines.
Results
were analysed to identify patient involvement, design strategies, SDM solutions, and their impact on care paths, professionals, and patients.
Results
Out of 2499 studies and 39 grey literature projects identified, 22 studies (reported in 35 publications) were selected, primarily from the USA and Europe (2015 onward). User-Centered Design predominated, involving health professionals more than patients. IPDAS standards were common. Evaluations showed improved patient experience and SDM role, with a potential increase in healthcare professionals' workload.
Conclusion
Although design methodologies are used in SDM implementation, improvement is needed. Service Design can enhance implementation by analysing the entire SDM process, while co-creative approaches develop patient-focused solutions that integrate smoothly into health professionals' workflows.
Practical implications
Introducing SDM in healthcare is complex, but design methodologies can help by analysing stakeholder needs, providing a broader care path view, and facilitating SDM implementation.
期刊介绍：
Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
