利用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜剥脱术清醒试验阳性的因素

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.011
Juliana Pereira-Macedo , Ana Daniela Pias , Luís Duarte-Gamas , Piotr Myrcha , José P. Andrade , Nuno António , Ana Marreiros , João Rocha-Neves
{"title":"利用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜剥脱术清醒试验阳性的因素","authors":"Juliana Pereira-Macedo ,&nbsp;Ana Daniela Pias ,&nbsp;Luís Duarte-Gamas ,&nbsp;Piotr Myrcha ,&nbsp;José P. Andrade ,&nbsp;Nuno António ,&nbsp;Ana Marreiros ,&nbsp;João Rocha-Neves","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Positive neurologic awake testing during the carotid cross-clamping may be present in around 8% of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The present work aimed to assess the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered risk calculator in predicting intraoperative neurologic deficits (INDs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data was collected from carotid interventions performed between January 2012 and January 2023 under regional anesthesia. Patients with IND were selected along with consecutive controls without IND in a case-control study design. A predictive model for IND was developed using machine learning, specifically Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model, and its performance was assessed and compared to an existing predictive model. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed for the model interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 216 patients, 108 experienced IND during CEA. The AI-based predictive model achieved a robust area under the curve of 0.82, with an accuracy of 0.75, precision of 0.88, sensitivity of 0.59, and F1Score of 0.71. High body mass index (BMI) increased contralateral carotid stenosis, and a history of limb paresis or plegia were significant IND risk factors. Elevated preoperative platelet and hemoglobin levels were associated with reduced IND risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This AI model provides precise IND prediction in CEA, enabling tailored interventions for high-risk patients and ultimately improving surgical outcomes. BMI, contralateral stenosis, and selected blood parameters emerged as pivotal predictors, bringing significant advancements to decision-making in CEA procedures. Further validation in larger cohorts is essential for broader clinical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 110-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Factors Driving Positive Awake Test in Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Pereira-Macedo ,&nbsp;Ana Daniela Pias ,&nbsp;Luís Duarte-Gamas ,&nbsp;Piotr Myrcha ,&nbsp;José P. Andrade ,&nbsp;Nuno António ,&nbsp;Ana Marreiros ,&nbsp;João Rocha-Neves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Positive neurologic awake testing during the carotid cross-clamping may be present in around 8% of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The present work aimed to assess the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered risk calculator in predicting intraoperative neurologic deficits (INDs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data was collected from carotid interventions performed between January 2012 and January 2023 under regional anesthesia. Patients with IND were selected along with consecutive controls without IND in a case-control study design. A predictive model for IND was developed using machine learning, specifically Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model, and its performance was assessed and compared to an existing predictive model. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed for the model interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 216 patients, 108 experienced IND during CEA. The AI-based predictive model achieved a robust area under the curve of 0.82, with an accuracy of 0.75, precision of 0.88, sensitivity of 0.59, and F1Score of 0.71. High body mass index (BMI) increased contralateral carotid stenosis, and a history of limb paresis or plegia were significant IND risk factors. Elevated preoperative platelet and hemoglobin levels were associated with reduced IND risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This AI model provides precise IND prediction in CEA, enabling tailored interventions for high-risk patients and ultimately improving surgical outcomes. BMI, contralateral stenosis, and selected blood parameters emerged as pivotal predictors, bringing significant advancements to decision-making in CEA procedures. Further validation in larger cohorts is essential for broader clinical implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 110-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624006769\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624006769","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:接受颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)的患者中,约有8%可能在颈动脉交叉钳夹术中出现神经系统清醒试验阳性。本研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)驱动的风险计算器在预测术中神经功能缺损(IND)方面的准确性:方法:从2012年1月至2023年1月期间在区域麻醉下进行的颈动脉介入手术中收集数据。采用病例对照研究设计,选择 IND 患者和未发生 IND 的连续对照组。利用机器学习(ML),特别是极端梯度提升(XGBoost)模型,开发了IND预测模型,并对其性能进行了评估,并与现有的预测模型进行了比较。对模型的解释采用了 Shapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)分析法:在 216 例患者中,108 例在 CEA 期间出现 IND。基于人工智能的预测模型的稳健曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.82,准确度为 0.75,精确度为 0.88,灵敏度为 0.59,F1Score 为 0.71。高体重指数(BMI)增加了对侧颈动脉狭窄,肢体瘫痪或截瘫病史是IND的重要风险因素。术前血小板和血红蛋白水平升高与 IND 风险降低有关:该人工智能模型可对 CEA 的 IND 进行精确预测,从而为高风险患者提供量身定制的干预措施,最终改善手术效果。体重指数、对侧血管狭窄程度和选定的血液参数是关键的预测因素,为CEA手术的决策带来了重大进步。在更大范围的临床应用中,进一步的队列验证至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Factors Driving Positive Awake Test in Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning

Background

Positive neurologic awake testing during the carotid cross-clamping may be present in around 8% of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The present work aimed to assess the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered risk calculator in predicting intraoperative neurologic deficits (INDs).

Methods

Data was collected from carotid interventions performed between January 2012 and January 2023 under regional anesthesia. Patients with IND were selected along with consecutive controls without IND in a case-control study design. A predictive model for IND was developed using machine learning, specifically Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model, and its performance was assessed and compared to an existing predictive model. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed for the model interpretation.

Results

Among 216 patients, 108 experienced IND during CEA. The AI-based predictive model achieved a robust area under the curve of 0.82, with an accuracy of 0.75, precision of 0.88, sensitivity of 0.59, and F1Score of 0.71. High body mass index (BMI) increased contralateral carotid stenosis, and a history of limb paresis or plegia were significant IND risk factors. Elevated preoperative platelet and hemoglobin levels were associated with reduced IND risk.

Conclusions

This AI model provides precise IND prediction in CEA, enabling tailored interventions for high-risk patients and ultimately improving surgical outcomes. BMI, contralateral stenosis, and selected blood parameters emerged as pivotal predictors, bringing significant advancements to decision-making in CEA procedures. Further validation in larger cohorts is essential for broader clinical implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Learning Experience after Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula Placement Workshop Utilizing the Ellipsys® Vascular Access System. Table of Contents Cognitive Impairment is Common and Unrecognized in Vascular Surgery Patients Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Hostile Artery Access: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study Open Revascularization for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia is Associated with Increased Morbidity and Mortality when Compared to Endovascular Intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1